ENTPs are more commonly pot stirrers because we rarely any ethical problem with making people feel uncomfortable.
Except for a few posts back where you wanted to stop the thread to make the world a happier place.
Famous ENTPs: Richard Feynman writes intelligently amusing letters to other academics...
Famous ENFPs: Andy Kaufman becomes Inter-Gender Wrestling Champion of the World.
Freude, schöner Götterfunken Tochter aus Elysium, Wir betreten feuertrunken, Himmlische, dein Heiligtum! Deine Zauber binden wieder Was die Mode streng geteilt; Alle Menschen werden Brüder, Wo dein sanfter Flügel weilt.
Of course I don't have any evidence, I'm acting intuitive. It's just an impression I get just like your impression that I don't appreciate non-physical attributes of women despite the fact that I have indicated my appreciation for them explicitly in many posts on this forum.
Stick to Sensing, babe.
I guess I meant examples, rather than evidence. PM me with them, if you feel like it. I really am interested.
And I really do like you.
Originally Posted by Ivy
Gosh, the world looks so small from up here on my high horse of menstruation.
Example: NT daughter (me) cannot understand SFJ mother's need to care so much about random thing. It has no pragmatic use at present or in the future. Yet it holds value to her for reasons that might be shared with other SFJs. NT daughter reads about SJs and tradition/maintenance of past and understands SFJ mom's irrational behaviour.
Does this mean I attribute every part of her behaviour to her SFJness? No. It means MBT gave me the tools to walk a mile in her shoes and understand the "why" behind her actions. Nothing more, nothing less.
Of course MBTI is used to analyze someone's behaviour.
Caring about something is not behaviour per se, so much as cognition.
Cognition can directly influence behavior, but there are other factors. I just like to emphasize that because I see too many half-arsed correlations. Besides, what do you mean by my argument not making any sense?