An uber ornery example of sp/sx, but I still think you're too homogenized in expression not to be e65 and misinterpreting infpness for 4ness so you'll live up to your inner ideal.
The focus on propriety down to the minutiae, not so much painfully thorough and alienating as muddied like a pen bleeding out across a flat, glossy surface. I've e6 molecular biologist relatives who can rattle on anything they'd like- probably have an impressive body of work within their highly respected field I can't begin to question but it all collapses under its own weight outside their little bubble: they're weird and awkward when pinned down due their inability to put ideas into motion which, under direct sunlight, transforms nearby sx/sp e56 intjs into presidential candidate material. Moral of the story is you demand to be seen as a respected figure who knows how to use the works of other, more highly respected figures in order to make points about realities that exist on self sustainance on this forum, or attack much heralded shrines like Mary Jo to stir controversy or Christopher Hitchens' sixty year farewell tour, there's zero correlation to reality, zero relevance, though maybe you secretly realize that and despise yourself for it, but the show must go on. I don't think I'd be any more likely to read this post if I hadn't already written it.