• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

INTJ or INFJ

Asterism

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
33
MBTI Type
IxxJ
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
I originally posted this on PerC, and these were the two suggested types. It's possible I could be neither, but either way, I'm open to feedback.


Is there anything that may affect the way you answer the questions? For example, a stressful time, mental illness, medications, special life circumstances? Other useful information includes sex, age, and current state of mind.

I’m in my late-twenties. My current state of mind is calm and I’m not being medicated for anything, unless spring allergies count.

Click on this link: Flickr: Explore! Look at the random photo for about 30 seconds. Copy and paste it here, and write about your impression of it.

flickr [dot] com / photos/ eva_patikian / 8652092505/

In this photo, the first word that came to mind was “forlorn;” the hue of the colors has been dimmed, and the woman in the center hides her face. However, this photo bothers me because there are a lot of little things that are at odds with each other, and I can’t discern whether that sense of confusion was intended or not. The woman hides her face, but her body is subtly turned towards the camera. Is she truly the focal point? Is this how she feels about spring? (the fact that cherry blossoms are often used as both a symbol of new beginnings and of death makes me wonder). Is there any significance to what she’s wearing? What does the composition ultimately mean, in the sense that it’s trying to communicate to the viewer?

You are with a group of people in a car, heading to a different town to see your favourite band/artist/musician. Suddenly, the car breaks down for an unknown reason in the middle of nowhere. What are your initial thoughts? What are your outward reactions?

I know very little about cars, but even so, I’d probably try and see if it’s an obvious problem than can easily be solved (e.g. out of gas). Otherwise, it’s time to call AAA and make alternative arrangements. This would be immensely irritating, especially if the concert was something I’ve been looking forward to for a while, but I’d try not to look upset since I prefer people thinking I’m more on the calm and reasonable side than I am. I think that, if my group didn’t seem too upset about it and was willing to call it an excursion (if we couldn’t make it to the concert at all) and do something else fun at a later date, I’d handle things much better.

You somehow make it to the concert. The driver wants to go to the afterparty that was announced (and assure you they won't drink so they can drive back later). How do you feel about this party? What do you do?

If I’ve just been to a concert, I’m probably far, far too over-stimulated to handle a party. I’ll probably be a little put-out and definitely wouldn’t believe the driver would be okay to drink after the fact, unless it was someone I knew personally and their word meant something. If the party is on the small side and has only a few friends of my concert-group, I’d probably just suck it up and deal, and try not to let my annoyance show. I’m almost always considerably more amenable to extended socializing after I’ve had a few drinks, so this might not be so bad.


On the drive back, your friends are talking. A friend makes a claim that clashes with your current beliefs. What is your inward reaction? What do you outwardly say?

Well, how severe is this clash of beliefs? If it’s something like chunky peanut butter being superior to smooth, then I’ll roll my eyes and offer my condolences for their tastes (jokingly, of course). If they’re against gay marriage or something equally bigoted, then they’d cease being a friend in that moment, and I’d wonder whether I could convince everyone to throw them out of the car. While I enjoy a good debate every now and again, I’m not wasting my time and energy on willful ignorance and prejudice, and I'd rather get the car ride over with as quickly and painlessly as possible. If it was something that I found particularly objectionable, then I would confront them in private, but it's very likely I'd simply stop associating with them if my feelings were hurt.

What would you do if you actually saw/experienced something that clashes with your previous beliefs, experiences, and habits?

If there’s compelling evidence to the contrary of something I believe, I’m very likely to change my mind. For example, I don’t believe that elephants come in orange because I have neither seen nor heard of an orange elephant. There is no research supporting evidence of an orange elephant, and no one I know has heard of such. However, if I were to leave my house one day and an orange elephant was grazing on the tree on my front lawn, clearly, I would have to reassess my way of thinking when it comes to elephants and their color schemes. It doesn’t matter if it’s an aberration, really; if an orange elephant is possible and exists, who’s to say there aren’t more? There could also be red and yellow elephants that give birth to orange elephants. In this instance, it’s obvious that the rules are no longer what I thought they were, so there’s no reason to hold onto them.

What are some of your most important values? How did you come about determining them? How can they change?

I have a general, all-purpose “treat others with common courtesy” rule which encompasses everything from standard modes of politeness to being aware of social/emotional boundaries and knowing when to overstep for the other person’s benefit and when to mind my own business by keeping a respectful distance. This has been determined through trial and error, and so far, seems to work the best for me and those around me. I say “common courtesy,” but something I’ve also learned is that courtesy isn’t common; it is, therefore, more appropriate to say that I strive to see everyone as an individual with unique needs and desires, and to treat them as kindly as the situation warrants. This means that I tend to be more socially progressive, overall, and that I place a high value on honesty, integrity, and so on.

Addendum: this is the only value I have that never changes, actually. What I deem important tends to vary as my needs and priorities shift, and I honestly can't say I spend very much time reflecting on this subject.

a) What about your personality most distinguishes you from everyone else? b) If you could change one thing about your personality, what would it be? Why?

a) There’s a tendency I have to actively resist participating in any sort of trend unless it’s something that interests me or if I think that my participation will have a positive impact in some way. I’ve never been able to do things merely because other people are; I derive no enjoyment from that, and that’s been a consistent point of contention between me and others. I’ve been called very self-centered because of this, but I believe it is self-centered to force the participation of others in something they aren’t interested in, for the sake of group cohesion. By contrast, I believe I understand why some people feel as if they and all their associates must have the exact same interests, and similar feelings about said interests-- or, at least, must behave as they do. There’s a certain sense of security and unity in that sameness, in the sense that potential conflicts are minimized and everyone seems to understand each other. Realistically speaking, though, this is never the case.

b) I think I would like to be far, far less empathetic, or less analytical, in the interests of bringing more balance to my psyche. Sometimes, I get tired of the perpetual tug of war between my instinct to detach and observe critically, and my drive to get involved and help. It also means that I never know what kind of impression I’m leaving; some of those who have met me in mode A think I’m very cold and horrible, and those who have met me in mode B think I’m the squishiest person ever. It’s very strange.

How do you treat hunches or gut feelings? In what situations are they most often triggered?

This is difficult to answer because a certain amount of this is a constant, for me. It’s easy for me to look at the complex interplay between groups of people or work processes and “see ahead” to a probable outcome. I follow my hunches if they’re particularly strong or compelling, and it’s a fairly often occurrence for me to, for example, feel that I should take a different route to work, only to arrive and hear about an accident somewhere along my usual way. My instincts about people are usually good, and while I don’t feel very strongly that anyone is good or bad, I can often tell on first meeting if so-and-so has a cordial veneer but is really kind of a prick and should be mostly avoided.

a) What activities energize you most? b) What activities drain you most? Why?

a) I’m energized by brief, spontaneous conversations that result in a really deep and passionate emotional connection, but soon after, the crash hits, and I need to retreat to process the events and how I feel about them. In addition, activities that most people (so it seems to me) would do to relax are actually what energize me; solo walks, anything crafty, reading, writing, and listening to certain types of music. My mood and energy levels are actually very tied to music; I need my daily dose of D&B to get me up and active in the morning.

b) Repetitive, detail-oriented tasks and I don’t get along. I’m a very patient, focused person, but I find myself quickly becoming frustrated and scatterbrained with anything that requires too many small processes performed over and over again. I also greatly dislike prolonged socializing with large groups of people and interpersonal conflict.

What do you repress about your outward behavior or internal thought process when around others? Why?

When I was a child, people found me very strange. I suppose it was thought of as cute, at first, but as I grew older, that changed and it seemed like I was unsettling them. I was quiet, but insightful and very perceptive, and over time, I learned to hide that perceptiveness except around a select group of people. In some ways, this feels like a betrayal of who I am, as well as dishonest, but it’s much better than dealing with the awkwardness of people spreading rumors that you’re psychic, when it’s more that you’re observant. And, even then, that would probably seem creepy to some. Even so, it’s not so much repression as a very careful and selective method of self-disclosure that I’ve found causes the least amount of problems.

Some supplemental questions:

You are on the clock to fix something, a friend of yours sits beside you and gives a lot of interesting ideas, none of them actually help or are related to your situation, but they are still something you find interesting. What is your reaction? What do you say? What do you do? What's your train of thought?

In all honesty, if I knew my friend was prone to doing precisely that, I would pre-empt the situation and tell them I’m working with time constraints and would have to get back to them later. If it were one of my own projects, I might get irritated initially but would quickly allow myself to be pleasantly distracted, but if I’m on the clock, then this task needs to be taken care of ASAP.

On the drive back from the event at question 3, the people in the car are talking. Someone makes a claim that you see as immoral/rude/cruel. What is your inward reaction? What do you think? What do you say?

There are a couple ways I can answer this, because my response will be different whether I’m feeling insulted/offended or not.

It depends on the context. I come from a family of people who say ridiculously rude things for the sake of humor, and that sort of thing is fine as long as everyone present is familiar with and accepting of the dynamic.

If I can tell someone is getting agitated or uncomfortable, I have a tendency to abruptly cut in with a subject change. With the car example, that would probably be the best course of action, since fully engaging (i.e. turning it into a debate or an argument) will drag in people who would otherwise not want to be involved and they wouldn’t readily have the option of removing themselves from the situation. I say this, but I know if what was said made me angry enough, I’d make it into an issue right then and there without regard for the social consequences.

Unfortunately, I shut down when personally offended or insulted, especially so if it’s from a friend, because I don’t want to lose them as a friend... but it’s hard to brush off the rude/cruel comment anyway and I’ll end up feeling hurt for quite a while afterward.

What makes you feel inferior?

I wouldn’t say “inferior,” but I do have three main areas in which I become self-conscious.

I’m constantly striving to be more creative with my writing and art and develop a style that’s very uniquely mine, however, I feel that I always fall short, and it makes me frustrated and envious of those who seem to have found their groove, so to speak. I know that I’m capable (intellectually, anyway...), but it’s difficult to translate what I see in my head to paper, and I have a tendency to lapse into a state of inertia whenever things aren’t progressing exactly as I want them to, which only increases the feelings of inferiority, since... well, the fact that this is a problem is a problem. The circular nature of it is ridiculous and humiliating because I consciously recognize that it’s self-perpetuating and self-destructive.

The above makes me question whether I’m as intelligent as I’ve been led to believe, but it’s not the only thing. I’m very bookish, but I have a horrible memory when it comes to precise detail like dates, times, and locations; my particular type of intelligence isn’t a traditional intellectualism - I’ve spent years trying to make myself distinct in this way - but I still feel residual social pressures to appear well-educated in the sort of nebulous way one tends to define that.

I’m not very athletic, prone to bizarre allergic reactions and illness, and just generally don’t have as much stamina as most people seem to. My utter uselessness in the physical realm is something I often try to compensate for, but my inability to pay proper attention to my surroundings means I wind up injured. My performance decreases sharply if I know I’m being observed, as well.

What's your opinion of getting frequent feedback on what you do? (Someone pointing out what is good, what is bad, what and how to improve) Is there a limit to how often you want feedback? If so, what is the limit?

I have a tendency to directly ask for feedback when I think I’ve hit a wall, or I think there’s room for improvement, and am generally rather comfortable with criticism if it’s constructive. However, I don’t like people who complain but offer no alternatives or possible solutions, and I’m not apt to consider their opinions valid since they’re bereft of substance. If someone was coming up to me and picking at everything I do, regardless of how small, I think I would get annoyed very quickly. I also don’t particularly enjoy being criticized on a work-in-progress, largely because I have the end result in mind already, and nitpicking the process wouldn’t mean much in the long run.
 

En Gallop

New member
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Messages
192
[MENTION=17588]Asterism[/MENTION]

Hi, I'd say you were INFJ. Certainly not INTJ. There's quite a lot of Fe (being polite, not liking interpersonal conflict, etc.) in your post which, as an INTP, I can identify with a bit, so it was an interesting read. :) There is actually a very small possibility of you being INTP, but the whole thing about trusting your intuitions, being psychic, etc. points towards Ni being more likely than Ne. Therefore, INFJ. :)
 

Asterism

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
33
MBTI Type
IxxJ
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
[MENTION=17588]Asterism[/MENTION]

Hi, I'd say you were INFJ. Certainly not INTJ. There's quite a lot of Fe (being polite, not liking interpersonal conflict, etc.) in your post which, as an INTP, I can identify with a bit, so it was an interesting read. :) There is actually a very small possibility of you being INTP, but the whole thing about trusting your intuitions, being psychic, etc. points towards Ni being more likely than Ne. Therefore, INFJ. :)

Thanks for the input. :D

The thing is, I'm not sure I'm using Fe over Fi. While I do have a working awareness of social mores, I feel no particular inclination to adhere to them, nor do I derive anything from doing so. I have a tendency to look at ideas and customs in terms of their objective purpose and subjective meaning/worth, which is why I think I might be Te/Fi over Fe/Ti. What do you think?
 

En Gallop

New member
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Messages
192
Thanks for the input. :D

The thing is, I'm not sure I'm using Fe over Fi. While I do have a working awareness of social mores, I feel no particular inclination to adhere to them, nor do I derive anything from doing so. I have a tendency to look at ideas and customs in terms of their objective purpose and subjective meaning/worth, which is why I think I might be Te/Fi over Fe/Ti. What do you think?

Sounds more like Ti thinking about Fe. :) But I'm not sure, as I don't really understand what you're saying. Can you give some actual examples of "look[ing] at ideas and customs in terms of their objective purpose and subjective meaning/worth"?
 

skylights

i love
Joined
Jul 6, 2010
Messages
7,756
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
6w7
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
I agree that you sound INFJ as well. :yes: Very NiFe.

The thing is, I'm not sure I'm using Fe over Fi. While I do have a working awareness of social mores, I feel no particular inclination to adhere to them, nor do I derive anything from doing so. I have a tendency to look at ideas and customs in terms of their objective purpose and subjective meaning/worth, which is why I think I might be Te/Fi over Fe/Ti. What do you think?

I think there is a lot of misunderstanding about Fe circulating on the internet. Many sources will claim that Fe users take in social values and utilize them as their own, but I think that is a huge oversimplification. Fe users are particularly aware of the meanings and effects of, literally, feeling extraverted - feeling expressed outside of the self, including expressed emotions, desires, and values. Fe users utilize external parameters in the Feeling world, just like Te users utilize external parameters in the Thinking world - Fe users are fairly practical in this sense, in terms of taking the situation that currently exists and altering it for improvement using available tools (such as a helping hand, soothing voice, intentional usage of interpersonal distance for comfort/appropriateness, engaging or disengaging, inclusion, and so on). So by extension, Fe dom/aux do tend to have a better grasp on what social mores are and how to utilize them in the way others will be receptive to them - they seem to have an inherent grasp on rules of courtesy, for example. And like you expressed personally, Fe users tend to have an interpersonal strategy that has been developed through learning what relational tactics work best for yourself and others. Fe users are are very aware of the expressed feelings, desires, and values of others, and tend to behave in ways that encourage outward harmony for everyone's sake. People who use Fe tend to identify as very empathetic and feel a strong drive to actively help.

Many of the phrases you wrote made me think aux Fe. :)
 

Asterism

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
33
MBTI Type
IxxJ
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
I agree that you sound INFJ as well. :yes: Very NiFe.



I think there is a lot of misunderstanding about Fe circulating on the internet. Many sources will claim that Fe users take in social values and utilize them as their own, but I think that is a huge oversimplification. Fe users are particularly aware of the meanings and effects of, literally, feeling extraverted - feeling expressed outside of the self, including expressed emotions, desires, and values. Fe users utilize external parameters in the Feeling world, just like Te users utilize external parameters in the Thinking world - Fe users are fairly practical in this sense, in terms of taking the situation that currently exists and altering it for improvement using available tools (such as a helping hand, soothing voice, intentional usage of interpersonal distance for comfort/appropriateness, engaging or disengaging, inclusion, and so on). So by extension, Fe dom/aux do tend to have a better grasp on what social mores are and how to utilize them in the way others will be receptive to them - they seem to have an inherent grasp on rules of courtesy, for example. And like you expressed personally, Fe users tend to have an interpersonal strategy that has been developed through learning what relational tactics work best for yourself and others. Fe users are are very aware of the expressed feelings, desires, and values of others, and tend to behave in ways that encourage outward harmony for everyone's sake. People who use Fe tend to identify as very empathetic and feel a strong drive to actively help.

Many of the phrases you wrote made me think aux Fe. :)

Thank you for the reply, although, I think giving me way too much credit. :alttongue: That's actually sort of a compliment, in a way: most of these strategies are very trial and error, and beyond a general vague sense of "something isn't right here/this person wants something/there's an extra expectation here but I have no idea what," I'm not particularly good with people in a casual sense. But, because a lot of what I do is very human system-oriented since that's where my interests lie, and because of the negative social consequences of not knowing how to cater to others on a subtle level, I've endeavored to learn ways of compensating for what I see as a deficiency-- the deficiency being that I don't have an inherent knowledge of what others expect of me or what usually takes place in a social transaction.

I'll do a bit more research on Fe, however, and get back to you soon.
 

Asterism

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
33
MBTI Type
IxxJ
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Sounds more like Ti thinking about Fe. :) But I'm not sure, as I don't really understand what you're saying. Can you give some actual examples of "look[ing] at ideas and customs in terms of their objective purpose and subjective meaning/worth"?

In order for something to serve a purpose for me, it must make sense. "Sense" is broadly defined and includes objective purpose (If I do x, then y occurs in a reliable pattern) and subjective worth (y leads to z, z being what I want/how I feel). It's something I touched upon in a very broad way with the bit about trends, but what it comes down to is that I simply can't see the point in doing something unless there's, well, a point to it. If there's a reason for a custom or a particular practice that can be easily observed by everyone present, and I happen to deem it worthwhile, then I'm fine with it. I'll then weigh those reasons against my personal beliefs and standards, and if nothing feels discordant or out of line with anything else, then I'm good to go. If not, I have a tendency to get sort of, for lack of a better way of putting it, "stuck," at which point I'll be very contrary and obstinate about whatever the original subject was, or whatever someone wanted me to do. It's rather childish, but I haven't entirely been able to curb this tendency.
 

Asterism

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
33
MBTI Type
IxxJ
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
a very bizarre INTJ or a very normal INFJ.

I would certainly accept either, except for the fact that I've always had trouble relating to either description, as well as most people who have typed themselves as such. It's why I'm open to the possibility that I could be neither of these.
 
S

Society

Guest
I would certainly accept either, except for the fact that I've always had trouble relating to either description, as well as most people who have typed themselves as such. It's why I'm open to the possibility that I could be neither of these.

a helpful question to help figure this out:

tell me about mistakes you've made in the past, what have you done about them and how do you feel about them.
 

highlander

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
26,578
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
6w5
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
I haven't even read what you said up there but if you have to ask then I'd say you are an INFJ
 

Asterism

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
33
MBTI Type
IxxJ
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
a helpful question to help figure this out:

tell me about mistakes you've made in the past, what have you done about them and how do you feel about them.

This is difficult, becaue I kind of have a self-propaganda thing going on and tend to spin my mistakes into "learning experiences," otherwise I would probably be swept away on the tides of my self-loathing. Melodramatic, yes, but I tend to be rather fixated on competency and being able to manage my life well, and when I fail to do so, it's a problem.

However, one thing that can be counted among mistakes is, rather than taking my professor up on an offer on a comfortable, two-year job (with benefits) that I would have been able to start after graduation, I balked at the idea of moving 1000 miles to do do more mindless data-entry than I had previously; this resulted in choosing to move back home in an attempt to find more meaningful work. This proved impossible, given the state of the economy and the area of the US I live in having been hit fairly hard. I spent two years in a slump and decided I was done with that and went elsewhere. More than anything, I regret that wasted, unproductive time because even now, I can't fully justify it or why I made such a faulty choice in the first place. Even though that job would have certainly bored me to tears, it would have definitely opened up opportunities for future endeavors, and turning that down was odd of me because I'm usually very future/results-motivated.

I suppose that there's no sense in truly pining over it, because it isn't as if I can get back that time. However, I did a lot of thinking (if not much else) and eventually came to the conclusion that what I was pursuing academically and career-wise wasn't entirely what I wanted to do, anyway, since I was essentially on autopilot and felt nothing for what I'd been doing before at all. So, what I've done about it was to basically shift the goalposts, in a way; it's no longer a "mistake" because it's irrelevant to what I'm doing now, so dwelling on what I could have done/should have done/etc. is completely ridiculous. Does that make sense?
 
S

Society

Guest
This is difficult, becaue I kind of have a self-propaganda thing going on and tend to spin my mistakes into "learning experiences," otherwise I would probably be swept away on the tides of my self-loathing. Melodramatic, yes, but I tend to be rather fixated on competency and being able to manage my life well, and when I fail to do so, it's a problem.

However, one thing that can be counted among mistakes is, rather than taking my professor up on an offer on a comfortable, two-year job (with benefits) that I would have been able to start after graduation, I balked at the idea of moving 1000 miles to do do more mindless data-entry than I had previously; this resulted in choosing to move back home in an attempt to find more meaningful work. This proved impossible, given the state of the economy and the area of the US I live in having been hit fairly hard. I spent two years in a slump and decided I was done with that and went elsewhere. More than anything, I regret that wasted, unproductive time because even now, I can't fully justify it or why I made such a faulty choice in the first place. Even though that job would have certainly bored me to tears, it would have definitely opened up opportunities for future endeavors, and turning that down was odd of me because I'm usually very future/results-motivated.

I suppose that there's no sense in truly pining over it, because it isn't as if I can get back that time. However, I did a lot of thinking (if not much else) and eventually came to the conclusion that what I was pursuing academically and career-wise wasn't entirely what I wanted to do, anyway, since I was essentially on autopilot and felt nothing for what I'd been doing before at all. So, what I've done about it was to basically shift the goalposts, in a way; it's no longer a "mistake" because it's irrelevant to what I'm doing now, so dwelling on what I could have done/should have done/etc. is completely ridiculous. Does that make sense?

well you're definitely working frame by frame - NJ style. but more specifically - this reads very much like INFJs, and contrary to INTJs: i've seen INTJs with plans and it's like there's a rubber band between them and where they want to go - if their is a fluke pulling them off they bounce right back to the plan. INFJs on the other hand tend to justify it, or "self propaganda" as you called it - that's because Te derived ego is directed towards successfully doing what was planned, while the Fe derived ego is directed towards how one appears to one's self.

the only potential point directing otherwise is measuring yourself by competency rather than intents, which potentially hints of a TJ ego (i know, i'm not helping).
 

Asterism

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
33
MBTI Type
IxxJ
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
well you're definitely working frame by frame - NJ style. but more specifically - this reads very much like INFJs, and contrary to INTJs: i've seen INTJs with plans and it's like there's a rubber band between them and where they want to go - if their is a fluke pulling them off they bounce right back to the plan. INFJs on the other hand tend to justify it, or "self propaganda" as you called it - that's because Te derived ego is directed towards successfully doing what was planned, while the Fe derived ego is directed towards how one appears to one's self.

the only potential point directing otherwise is measuring yourself by competency rather than intents, which potentially hints of a TJ ego (i know, i'm not helping).

Well, I'm still doing what was planned. I haven't actually changed my course of study entirely; the end point is now slightly left of center (or rather there's a new center), so the plan had to change accordingly. The ultimate result (getting my PhD) is still the same.

I get what you're saying, though, and that's a behavior I've definitely observed with dom/aux Te. I tend to mentally meander a lot more than that would (theoretically) suggest, so I've always felt a little disconnected from the function descriptions. Something about it seems too rigid to me.

And you're actually helping a lot. Do you think it's possible I'm not Ni-dominant at all?
 
Last edited:
S

Society

Guest
And you're actually helping a lot. Do you think it's possible I'm not Ni-dominant at all?

let's have a look:




The above makes me question whether I’m as intelligent as I’ve been led to believe, but it’s not the only thing. I’m very bookish, but I have a horrible memory when it comes to precise detail like dates, times, and locations; my particular type of intelligence isn’t a traditional intellectualism - I’ve spent years trying to make myself distinct in this way - but I still feel residual social pressures to appear well-educated in the sort of nebulous way one tends to define that.
b) Repetitive, detail-oriented tasks and I don’t get along. I’m a very patient, focused person, but I find myself quickly becoming frustrated and scatterbrained with anything that requires too many small processes performed over and over again. I also greatly dislike prolonged socializing with large groups of people and interpersonal conflict.


you seem to lack Si completely (suggesting that if you're a J - you are an NJ).


and I have a tendency to lapse into a state of inertia whenever things aren’t progressing exactly as I want them to, which only increases the feelings of inferiority, since... well, the fact that this is a problem is a problem. The circular nature of it is ridiculous and humiliating because I consciously recognize that it’s self-perpetuating and self-destructive.
a very common problem for Js, very rare for Ps.


How do you treat hunches or gut feelings? In what situations are they most often triggered?

This is difficult to answer because a certain amount of this is a constant, for me. It’s easy for me to look at the complex interplay between groups of people or work processes and “see ahead” to a probable outcome. I follow my hunches if they’re particularly strong or compelling, and it’s a fairly often occurrence for me to, for example, feel that I should take a different route to work, only to arrive and hear about an accident somewhere along my usual way. My instincts about people are usually good, and while I don’t feel very strongly that anyone is good or bad, I can often tell on first meeting if so-and-so has a cordial veneer but is really kind of a prick and should be mostly avoided.
again - a big supporting point for NJ.


I’m constantly striving to be more creative with my writing and art and develop a style that’s very uniquely mine, however, I feel that I always fall short, and it makes me frustrated and envious of those who seem to have found their groove, so to speak. I know that I’m capable (intellectually, anyway...), but it’s difficult to translate what I see in my head to paper
you're defining your skill in terms of unrealized potential you identify in yourself, not results. even if we took it that your social skills were entirely a non natural construct to get along in society, this would still be another big point towards NFJ.




b) I think I would like to be far, far less empathetic, or less analytical, in the interests of bringing more balance to my psyche. Sometimes, I get tired of the perpetual tug of war between my instinct to detach and observe critically, and my drive to get involved and help. It also means that I never know what kind of impression I’m leaving; some of those who have met me in mode A think I’m very cold and horrible, and those who have met me in mode B think I’m the squishiest person ever. It’s very strange.
Fe conflicting with analysis paralysis - i have never known an INFJ who didn't complain about this being a consistent part of their life. in a theoretical framework this is mostly supportive of you being a J - who thrive on maximum coherence (rather than maximum stimulation).

to contrast, Ps function quite well with unknowns and unresolved issues, because frankly we don't have the alternative - we become over confident in our ability adapt to any situation even if we don't understand it (while Js grow overconfident in their understanding of any situation).

most note worthy is that you aren't looking for precedence, you are looking for observation - you are seeking to make connections within the current flow of data (NiSe as apposed to SiNe).
What are some of your most important values? How did you come about determining them? How can they change?

I have a general, all-purpose “treat others with common courtesy” rule which encompasses everything from standard modes of politeness to being aware of social/emotional boundaries and knowing when to overstep for the other person’s benefit and when to mind my own business by keeping a respectful distance. This has been determined through trial and error, and so far, seems to work the best for me and those around me. I say “common courtesy,” but something I’ve also learned is that courtesy isn’t common; it is, therefore, more appropriate to say that I strive to see everyone as an individual with unique needs and desires, and to treat them as kindly as the situation warrants. This means that I tend to be more socially progressive, overall, and that I place a high value on honesty, integrity, and so on.
and we hit the NFJ motherload... warning: approaching stereotype level. the previous notion that your idea of courtesy is a construct made to adapt to society falls down right here - you are demonstrating comparing the world to an idealized version of it.



you had your chance of being an NT, but.. it doesn't seem likely. i am sorry for your loss :dalek:
 

Siúil a Rúin

when the colors fade
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
14,038
MBTI Type
ISFP
Enneagram
496
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
well you're definitely working frame by frame - NJ style. but more specifically - this reads very much like INFJs, and contrary to INTJs: i've seen INTJs with plans and it's like there's a rubber band between them and where they want to go - if their is a fluke pulling them off they bounce right back to the plan. INFJs on the other hand tend to justify it, or "self propaganda" as you called it - that's because Te derived ego is directed towards successfully doing what was planned, while the Fe derived ego is directed towards how one appears to one's self.

the only potential point directing otherwise is measuring yourself by competency rather than intents, which potentially hints of a TJ ego (i know, i'm not helping).
Wouldn't the parallel to Te ego being based on fulfilling a plan be a Fe ego being based on fulfilling a more outward focused value based goal, rather than inward towards self-perception? Based on MBTI wouldn't Fi be more concerned with a consistent internal perception and Fe be more concerned with outward consistency like harmony between self and the outside world? I would suggest that while individuals can be complex and not adhere to theory, that the theory would propose a Fe based ego judgment to focus on success in goals focused on external, relational connections like pleasing an employer, a partner, etc. regardless of how this makes one feel about self (when taken to its extreme)?

I propose that Fi is the function that requires consistency in self-perception, which is why the Fe driven judgments require more external validation. It could be that Fe judgment would not admit outwardly to internal fault, but the motivation would be to maintain the outward harmony and consistency rather than to maintain an internal, positive self-perception.

Edit: When I hung out on the INFJ forum, I remember a number of members expressing a level of brutal personal honesty and self-criticism that I have never seen any place else online.
 

Asterism

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
33
MBTI Type
IxxJ
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
snip

you had your chance of being an NT, but.. it doesn't seem likely. i am sorry for your loss :dalek:

I'll survive, somehow. :cry:

It's an interesting analysis, though, and I thank you for taking the time to do it. There does seem to be a bit of a disconnect between how I've always understood Fi and Fe and how you're defining it. Basically,

Based on MBTI wouldn't Fi be more concerned with a consistent internal perception and Fe be more concerned with outward consistency like harmony between self and the outside world?

Is the main idea (as far as how I view the difference), consistent internal perception being the key. In essence, I can't entirely accept INFJ because I happen to be close to a couple of them, and there are rather consistent value-based clashes between them and myself. They're much more externally-directed and outwardly consistent as far as how they present themselves to others, based on what they can tell people would be more comfortable with, and this comes naturally to them and makes sense. The chameleon effect seems to drain me much faster, meanwhile, and I have to be very selective and strategic about how/when I use it (co-workers, academic superiors, and that's pretty much it). I only developed this attitude because my default "come as you are" approach is very off-putting to most of the people I've encountered, so it's really just a means to an end.
 
S

Society

Guest
Wouldn't the parallel to Te ego being based on fulfilling a plan be a Fe ego being based on fulfilling a more outward focused value based goal, rather than inward towards self-perception? Based on MBTI wouldn't Fi be more concerned with a consistent internal perception and Fe be more concerned with outward consistency like harmony between self and the outside world? I would suggest that while individuals can be complex and not adhere to theory, that the theory would propose a Fe based ego judgment to focus on success in goals focused on external, relational connections like pleasing an employer, a partner, etc. regardless of how this makes one feel about self (when taken to its extreme)?

I propose that Fi is the function that requires consistency in self-perception, which is why the Fe driven judgments require more external validation. It could be that Fe judgment would not admit outwardly to internal fault, but the motivation would be to maintain the outward harmony and consistency rather than to maintain an internal, positive self-perception.

hmm.. while that does work with the inwards/outwards metaphors, i think its safe to say that unless everything else we know about psychology is wrong, everyone has an ego they cater too in their own ways and everyone (with the exception of extreme mental illnesses) has tools to relate to people in the outside world. i actually think the inwards/outwards metaphors aren't the best descriptions of the traits later associated with Fi/Fe to begin with - and a lot of the resulting multiplicity of inconsistent theories stems from people having different uses for that metaphor (deep vs. shallow, self serving vs. utilitarian, and about a thousand other things that don't really describe any member of the related types), which is why i think it's a lot more useful to think of the functions in the pairs they come in - FiTe and FeTi (aggressive tendencies and weight issues aside :p ), working from the commonalities each pair has, and then seen them being used to different purposes.

FiTe projects: Fi asks "how things would feel" and projects the internal answer on external objects, Te asks "what do i want" and formulates information into a map of how to get from A to Z. they are both generated by a person projecting their internal content outside.

FeTi reflects: Fe reflects upon the emotional signals and consensus from others and manifests a mirror of it within, Ti reflects upon information, exploring it's form and shape. it's somewhat like an empty vase constantly absorbing and reflecting upon the external.

on a sidenote:


so to apply it there - both FiTe and FeTi people are going to formulate identities and ego and both are going to relate to the emotions of others, but they use a different toolset: FiTe isn't going to have the middle stone of "how i appear to be" - they don't really imagine themselves through other's eyes in the first place, they can but for them its a very long and forced route which involves putting themselves in the other's feet (which they do naturally - but without accounting that the person is not the themselves), adjusting to what circumstances can lead to the different mindset (requiring them to know the person well enough), play around with it until they have a version they can identify with (assuming they have Fi/Ne), and doing so over and over again to a lot of people in order to get a grasp of what the consensus of appearance might be like (may need medication afterwards)... and even after they do all of that, it's not going to hold much grounds, because they have a shortcut dismissing the resulting answer which they experience as a lot more genuine to them - whether what they did or didn't do is acceptable to themselves. as a result, they don't shape their interpretations of events to look better - it's validated by simply being acknowledged that this is what they felt needs to be done, often with disregard to how things look.

disclaimer:
 

Asterism

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
33
MBTI Type
IxxJ
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
[MENTION=15291]Mane[/MENTION]

From that explanation, it looks like we're on the same page, for the most part. I think what I need to do now is hang around more than I have been and observe, bounce some ideas off others IRL, and come back to this at a later date to see if everything lines up. Thanks again.
 

Asterism

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
33
MBTI Type
IxxJ
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Okay, research and recon have revealed that I'm operating under a particularly heavy self-perception bias, and that I've unknowingly conflated some features of Fi with Ti. After reading these articles, and going back to Jung's Psychosocial Types, it's pretty clear I'm more Te-Fi, which would make a little of the Fi/Ti confusion make sense; because while I see my logic as subjective, it isn't in any sense of the term unless something dovetails with my internal values system, which I still can't really articulate. External values as far as how I'll behave are easy to put into words, meanwhile, because they're based on extensive study of my surroundings and are determined based on what works for me and what doesn't, which seems like an interaction between Te and Se. Having a couple of INFJs to bounce ideas off has helped immensely; both have known me for quite some time and were able to cite specific instances in which we've had a complete breakdown in communication, what led to that, and how we worked through it (or, let's be honest, it was more like how we got sick of talking about it and let it lie after stewing ineffectually).

This has also revealed that my head fix is most assuredly 6; the typing question prompted me to approach this via a different system, and I ended up digging into the nature of 6ish anxiety/doubt and skepticism. One could say that may have led me here in the first place, since I really felt I needed to be certain about this, but that's almost another subject. Anyway, I think it's settled - as far as I'm concerned - but I'm open to debating the point now that I believe I'm sufficiently informed.

Oh, and [MENTION=15291]Mane[/MENTION], thanks again for engaging me on this.
 
Top