Analyze Victor/split from Forum's Scariest Members

[Phantonym]

i'll just say this once more: The cringe is strong with victor's posts

Heh. It seems to me that Victor is the most misunderstood member, if we're giving out titles here.

 

[Requeim]

Heh. It seems to me that Victor is the most misunderstood member, if we're giving out titles here.

no, that's what he want you to think

he's already admitted to having histrionic traits, so he has to stand out somehow, right?

 

[The Outsider]

Let the guy post as he will. If it truly bothers anyone, it's their shortcoming.

 

[Phantonym]

Let the guy post as he will. If it truly bothers anyone, it's their shortcoming.

Absolutely!

 

[Requeim]

whatever

 

[Phantonym]

whatever

You're scary.

 

[Litvyak]

no, that's what he wants you to think

he's already admitted to having histrionic traits, so he has to stand out somehow, right?

I second this.

 

[Fluffywolf]

no, that's what he want you to think

he's already admitted to having histrionic traits, so he has to stand out somehow, right?

Wether that's true or not, it's still not important. I don't see him harming anyone. And this forum is supposed to let people be themselves and be appreciated for that regardless of their opinions and actions. He has his own identity, and no one should expect him to act any different than how he believes he should act himself.


As long as people do not intentionally attempt to harm or abuse others, I see no problem however they are. Victor, whatever his intentions, falls into that category. He's himself and he's harmless.

So try to live up to that big F in your MBTI type. You're doing something wrong if T's teach your a thing or two about social interactions!

 

[Requeim]

He's himself

really??

You're scary.

i've never been told that before :O

 

[Fluffywolf]

really??

Shame I can't say you fit in the same category. You might be yourself, but I can't say you're not intentionally harming anyone on this forum.

For that alone, I like Victor more.

 

[Phantonym]

i've never been told that before :O

There's always the first time. Nah, you're not scary, just teasing.

 

[Kasper]

whatever

I think she'd be proud.

 

[Requeim]

Shame I can't say you fit in the same category. You might be yourself, but I can't say you're not intentionally harming anyone on this forum.

For that alone, I like Victor more.

aww, that's cute

I think she'd be proud.

who?

 

[Litvyak]

Wether that's true or not, it's still not important.

It's not important to be yourself?
Wow. You stick to a very narrow definition of 'manipulating people'.

 

[Fluffywolf]

It's not important to be yourself?
Wow.

How do you define being yourself? If you write a skill on your application form that does not fit you in order to get a better chance at a job. Doesn't that action itself define who you are, for it was clearly important to you to do that?

That said, I'm personally not convinced with that arguement, that he has a certain intentional agenda. Definatly not in the intention of the person concerning the arguement. But whatever his reasons may be, he is still himself. So that arguement whatever his reasons are, are not important in the point I made.

 

[Kasper]

who?

whatever.


*plays 'who's on first' over in head*

 

[Requeim]

whatever.


*plays 'who's on first' over in head*

still confused

 

[Kasper]

still confused

I know

Costello: Well then who's on first?

Abbott: Yes.


...

 

[Lux]

Sorry this is totally worthless but...

 

[Litvyak]

How do you define being yourself?

Not consciously playing a role different from your real life behavior in order to manipulate people, whether for attention seeking or other purposes.

Doesn't that action itself define who you are

It grants a picture of the way you do things, but no. It does not "itself define who you are", it does define how you want to be percieved as. This of course breeds from your own personality, your own traits, and your own faults, nobody argues that point.

That said, I'm personally not convinced with that arguement, that he has a certain intentional agenda.

You are entitled to your opinion. I disagree.

But whatever his reasons may be, he is still himself.

You are unnecessarily taking a very unambiguous observation on a philosophical level. The mask you wear does give hints about your personality as a whole, but it's still a malicious delusion.