User Tag List

Page 8 of 21 FirstFirst ... 67891018 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 202

Thread: A Quick Guide To Double-Checking Your Type

  1. #71
    Senior Member Array King sns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    enfp
    Enneagram
    6w7 sp/sx
    Socionics
    IEE
    Posts
    6,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackCat View Post
    Disprove it. And I don't mean put some random crap by some random typologist that doesn't follow the theory we're discussing.

    You process things through your dominant totally unconsciously, and you use the secondary as a tool generally, and you "tap into it" usually. It's use won't be the same as the dominant.
    Are you saying that Amargith and I are both just big freaks?

  2. #72
    Proud Otherkin Snowflake Array Amargith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    NF
    Enneagram
    4dw sx/so
    Socionics
    IEx None
    Posts
    14,024

    Default

    LOL^


    @ BC: I see why this is an open and shut case for you. Yes, according to your post, I would be an E. The reason I jumped to people is because I focus on people...most of the time. My other side is constant gathering of information, learning new things, hoarding knowledge...I guess you consider that interaction with the world as well or? Coz that's what I do all day when home alone. And then after, mulling it over as to how I can apply it elsewhere as well, or how it can help me improve myself as a person.

    But the fact that my friends, not to mention my family (and don't even get me started about big parties with a ton of people I don't know) drain me like mad, make me seriously doubt my E. I've always been that way too. It's pretty much dependent on what the ambiance is that the people together create and how openminded they are. If I can sync up with them, I can ride that wave for hours, and recharge that way. If not, I soo need to get home to recharge as it drains the lifeforce right out of me.


    Also, I agree with Jag. My first reaction to your statement about leading with either one or the other was: prove it!
    Seriously, I just switch depending on my mood and my current project. If I'm scavenging for new info, I'll lead with Ne..see if anything fun comes along that I can play with. If I'm focussed on improving something within me, or understanding another person, I'll use Ne to feed Fi to complete the puzzle.
    ★ڿڰۣ✿ℒoѵℯ✿ڿڰۣ★

  3. #73

    Default

    According to my coin toss Shortnsweet is E and Amargith is I. I was hoping SnS would be ISFP. I really did.

  4. #74
    Magical Array BlackCat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    ESFP
    Enneagram
    9w8 sx/sp
    Socionics
    SEE Fi
    Posts
    6,903

    Default

    Whatever. I don't give a shit anymore, since I'm not going to change You (amar), shortnsweet, or Jag's position with anything that I say. Your types are obvious anyways.

    I'm going to eat some turkey, have a good day.
    () 9w8-3w2-7w6 tritype.

    RCueI (primary Inquisition)

  5. #75
    Senior Member Array King sns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    enfp
    Enneagram
    6w7 sp/sx
    Socionics
    IEE
    Posts
    6,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amargith View Post
    LOL^


    @ BC: I see why this is an open and shut case for you. Yes, according to your post, I would be an E. The reason I jumped to people is because I focus on people...most of the time. My other side is constant gathering of information, learning new things, hoarding knowledge...I guess you consider that interaction with the world as well or? Coz that's what I do all day when home alone. And then after, mulling it over as to how I can apply it elsewhere as well, or how it can help me improve myself as a person.

    But the fact that my friends, not to mention my family (and don't even get me started about big parties with a ton of people I don't know) drain me like mad, make me seriously doubt my E. I've always been that way too. It's pretty much dependent on what the ambiance is that the people together create and how openminded they are. If I can sync up with them, I can ride that wave for hours, and recharge that way. If not, I soo need to get home to recharge as it drains the lifeforce right out of me.


    Also, I agree with Jag. My first reaction to your statement about leading with either one or the other was: prove it!
    Seriously, I just switch depending on my mood and my current project. If I'm scavenging for new info, I'll lead with Ne..see if anything fun comes along that I can play with. If I'm focussed on improving something within me, or understanding another person, I'll use Ne to feed Fi to complete the puzzle.

    For me it presents a lot differently.
    But the part where, "you just switch."
    That I can relate to.

    Sometimes I can just sit for hours, focusing on one or few things.
    Sit at the computer, knit with a pup in my lap, draw, try on different hair styles, read recipes, whatever floats my boat at the moment. And gain energy. Yea, i'm focused on the external world. But this is part of having Se, (dom or aux) its part of being SFP. You can't be SFP and NOT focus on the external world all the time. Especially with as strong of an S as I have. I think that being able to do a low key thing for so long (and gain energy this way) makes me an I at times. But sometimes I will just "switch." And be able to talk to people, do things, run around like a mad woman, and never seem to run low. One day, I get sick of it, and go back to the quiet, passive phase again. There's no other way to describe it.

    (And i'm not disagreeing with you, Blackcat, I just don't know for sure whether or not I agree. Now i'm just proving to be an indecisive P.)

  6. #76
    Senior Member Array King sns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    enfp
    Enneagram
    6w7 sp/sx
    Socionics
    IEE
    Posts
    6,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wolfy View Post
    According to my coin toss Shortnsweet is E and Amargith is I. I was hoping SnS would be ISFP. I really did.
    According to my coin, i'm an E too. And that's a capital E.
    There's no spectrum on my coin. My coin also made Amar an I.

  7. #77
    Proud Otherkin Snowflake Array Amargith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    NF
    Enneagram
    4dw sx/so
    Socionics
    IEx None
    Posts
    14,024

    Default

    I hear ya, same for me
    What I do depends on what my mood dictates, and it definitely cycles between hermit-social butterfly.
    ★ڿڰۣ✿ℒoѵℯ✿ڿڰۣ★

  8. #78

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shortnsweet View Post
    For me it presents a lot differently.
    But the part where, "you just switch."
    That I can relate to.

    Sometimes I can just sit for hours, focusing on one or few things.
    Sit at the computer, knit with a pup in my lap, draw, try on different hair styles, read recipes, whatever floats my boat at the moment. And gain energy. Yea, i'm focused on the external world. But this is part of having Se, (dom or aux) its part of being SFP. You can't be SFP and NOT focus on the external world all the time. I think that being able to do a low key thing for so long makes me an I at times. But sometimes I will just "switch." And be able to talk to people, do things, run around like a mad woman, and never seem to run low. One day, I get sick of it, and go back to the quiet, passive phase again. There's no other way to describe it.
    I'm like that too.

  9. #79
    Senior Member Array Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    10,668

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackCat View Post
    Disprove it. And I don't mean put some random crap by some random typologist that doesn't follow the theory we're discussing.

    You process things through your dominant totally unconsciously, and you use the secondary as a tool generally, and you "tap into it" usually. It's use won't be the same as the dominant.

    Great, more unfounded claims with no proof of anything.
    That dog won't hunt.

    I'm waiting for you to claim all blacks are criminals.
    Then when I ask you to prove it, you'll give that same lame response of "disprove it."

    Ridiculous.


    Quote Originally Posted by BlackCat View Post
    Whatever. I don't give a shit anymore, since I'm not going to change You (amar), shortnsweet, or Jag's position with anything that I say. Your types are obvious anyways.

    I'm going to eat some turkey, have a good day.
    Nothing is "obvious."
    Even MBTI states on their website that only the individual knows their own type.
    MBTI attempts to measure preferences.
    A gullible person would think they can observe the truth about a person's preferences, in an online forum.
    For all you know, I'm an 80-year old woman with a preference for ESFJ,
    but I have an online persona that has everyone fooled.
    You can't actually know the truth about people in an online forum, unless you delude yourself. It's not real life.

    I think I'm going to start telling people in this forum I can SEE their preference for Vanilla ice cream.

  10. #80
    Magical Array BlackCat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    ESFP
    Enneagram
    9w8 sx/sp
    Socionics
    SEE Fi
    Posts
    6,903

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaguar View Post
    Great, more unfounded claims with no proof of anything.
    That dog won't hunt.

    I'm waiting for you to claim all blacks are criminals.
    Then when I ask you to prove it, you'll give that same lame response of "disprove it."

    Ridiculous.
    The proof (as in, where it's written down) is in the literature that people read to get to this point, the basics of this theory that we're following.

    And why would I claim all blacks are criminals? Neither that, nor where you're coming from with that statement, is really relevant.

    I don't want to argue with a wall. Since you're never going to change your position, and I'm not going to change mine. So I don't care.

    How do you go about proving any theory then? Any bit of theory? All you have to say to someone is "prove it" and they can't really. That's why it's called theory, and not an absolute.

    Besides, that's sort of a difficult question to answer. Since the proof (as in, where it's observable) is in the people, and that's what this is all about. But that wouldn't be a valid answer to your question, since more ad hominems would come in an infinite supply from you, with any response that I, or anyone else will give to anything you say.

    Go eat some turkey you crazy cat.
    () 9w8-3w2-7w6 tritype.

    RCueI (primary Inquisition)

Similar Threads

  1. [MBTItm] Am I INFJ or INTJ? A Quick Guide
    By CuriousFeeling in forum The NF Idyllic (ENFP, INFP, ENFJ, INFJ)
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-11-2015, 01:20 AM
  2. Extraverted Intuition: A Quick Reference Guide
    By Jaguar in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 11-12-2010, 02:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO