Matthew Z, I don't really know much about you, but from my experience of your behavior on the forum I'm going to guess that you are INTP. My reasons include the following:
I can relate to your posts more than half of the time.
You phrase things very precisely, which in theory is very INTP-like.
You are more articulate than many on this forum.
This is sort of like my first point, but there are a few posts of yours that I feel like I could have written myself. And to put that into context, there are only a few posters on this forum who write things that I can relate to on a similar level.
You seem very calm and collected. Very rational.
There are also a few posts of yours that I really cannot relate to. So far, however, these are the minority.
The pertinence of half of my above list is based on the assumption that I am an INTP, which may not actually be the case (I have considered INFP and INTJ seriously in the past).
You seem to have an empirical bent that reminds me of many NTJs and STJs.
Buyer beware? Why not Caveat lector (reader beware)?
Forgive the nit-picky mood, I'm just trying to read between your language.
Because you needed to beware before "buying" what I said, meaning that I am not liable for this information in the case that it turns out to be "defective." I was using it metaphorically (if inappropriately....and, well, crappily). But yeah, if I wanted to use the "correct" one I should have said caveat lector. I'll change it. Pedant .
I always assume you to be ISTJ, and forget you are INTP. Why? Don't know!! Did you have ISTJ up as your type at one point? I'm stuck on that.
When I came to this forum, I had ISTJ listed as my type. About 2 weeks after joining, the listing changed to INTP and has been that way ever since. (save for a few "jokes" I played by changing type listed there to see who noticed)
If a deaf INFP falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?