|
|
|
|
06-25-2009, 04:55 AM
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
It's always something...
Join Date: Apr 2007
Type: INFJ
Location: in a hollowy place
Posts: 1,937
 |
Welcome to the forum, glad to meetcha!
__________________
"In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay one invincible summer." ~~~~ A Christian's life may be the only Bible some people ever read. ~~~~ "If you love something, set it free. If it returns, it's yours forever; if not, it was never meant to be." |
|
|
|
06-25-2009, 06:19 AM
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Type: ESTJ
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 180
|
Quote:
 Welcome, look.to.the.sky! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-25-2009, 03:18 PM
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Type: ENFP
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11
|
Thank you for all the welcomes! I didn't notice that I got so many replies!
 There are indeed a lot of differences between MBTI and Socionics, to the point where they are completely different and you can be two different types side-by-side. I haven't been able to find too many Socionics threads here, as I'm sure that the majority of the forum leans majorly towards MBTI. I think the one misunderstood fact about Socionics is the assumption it relies on Visual Identification (VI). This is because most peoples' first encounter with Socionics is Socionics.com, and while it's type descriptions are okay, the test is bad and the VI hypothesis is horrible. VI is better described as watching body language and over all watching the person without interacting with them to guess their type. In essence, I'm sure people who practice MBTI do this as well, but it's easier for MBTI since Socionics types based off of the functions rather than the dichotomies.
__________________
pursuing my true self |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
