lol, where does he hide the joint in that great hand of his
User Tag List
Thread: Introduce Your Nemesis

10022008, 12:07 AM #11[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEBvftJUwDw&t=0s[/URL]

10022008, 12:17 AM #12"Hey Capa  We're only stardust." ~ "Sunshine"
“Pleasure to me is wonder—the unexplored, the unexpected, the thing that is hidden and the changeless thing that lurks behind superficial mutability. To trace the remote in the immediate; the eternal in the ephemeral; the past in the present; the infinite in the finite; these are to me the springs of delight and beauty.” ~ H.P. Lovecraft

10022008, 12:45 AM #13
Right now, I have 7deadly nemeses:
 Birch and SwinnertonDyer Conjecture
Mathematicians have always been fascinated by the problem of describing all solutions in whole numbers x,y,z to algebraic equations like
x2 + y2 = z2
Euclid gave the complete solution for that equation, but for more complicated equations this becomes extremely difficult. Indeed, in 1970 Yu. V. Matiyasevich showed that Hilbert's tenth problem is unsolvable, i.e., there is no general method for determining when such equations have a solution in whole numbers. But in special cases one can hope to say something. When the solutions are the points of an abelian variety, the Birch and SwinnertonDyer conjecture asserts that the size of the group of rational points is related to the behavior of an associated zeta function ?(s) near the point s=1. In particular this amazing conjecture asserts that if ?(1) is equal to 0, then there are an infinite number of rational points (solutions), and conversely, if ?(1) is not equal to 0, then there is only a finite number of such points.  Hodge Conjecture
In the twentieth century mathematicians discovered powerful ways to investigate the shapes of complicated objects. The basic idea is to ask to what extent we can approximate the shape of a given object by gluing together simple geometric building blocks of increasing dimension. This technique turned out to be so useful that it got generalized in many different ways, eventually leading to powerful tools that enabled mathematicians to make great progress in cataloging the variety of objects they encountered in their investigations. Unfortunately, the geometric origins of the procedure became obscured in this generalization. In some sense it was necessary to add pieces that did not have any geometric interpretation. The Hodge conjecture asserts that for particularly nice types of spaces called projective algebraic varieties, the pieces called Hodge cycles are actually (rational linear) combinations of geometric pieces called algebraic cycles.  NavierStokes Equations
Waves follow our boat as we meander across the lake, and turbulent air currents follow our flight in a modern jet. Mathematicians and physicists believe that an explanation for and the prediction of both the breeze and the turbulence can be found through an understanding of solutions to the NavierStokes equations. Although these equations were written down in the 19th Century, our understanding of them remains minimal. The challenge is to make substantial progress toward a mathematical theory which will unlock the secrets hidden in the NavierStokes equations.  P vs NP
Suppose that you are organizing housing accommodations for a group of four hundred university students. Space is limited and only one hundred of the students will receive places in the dormitory. To complicate matters, the Dean has provided you with a list of pairs of incompatible students, and requested that no pair from this list appear in your final choice. This is an example of what computer scientists call an NPproblem, since it is easy to check if a given choice of one hundred students proposed by a coworker is satisfactory (i.e., no pair taken from your coworker's list also appears on the list from the Dean's office), however the task of generating such a list from scratch seems to be so hard as to be completely impractical. Indeed, the total number of ways of choosing one hundred students from the four hundred applicants is greater than the number of atoms in the known universe! Thus no future civilization could ever hope to build a supercomputer capable of solving the problem by brute force; that is, by checking every possible combination of 100 students. However, this apparent difficulty may only reflect the lack of ingenuity of your programmer. In fact, one of the outstanding problems in computer science is determining whether questions exist whose answer can be quickly checked, but which require an impossibly long time to solve by any direct procedure. Problems like the one listed above certainly seem to be of this kind, but so far no one has managed to prove that any of them really are so hard as they appear, i.e., that there really is no feasible way to generate an answer with the help of a computer. Stephen Cook and Leonid Levin formulated the P (i.e., easy to find) versus NP (i.e., easy to check) problem independently in 1971.  Poincar Conjecture
If we stretch a rubber band around the surface of an apple, then we can shrink it down to a point by moving it slowly, without tearing it and without allowing it to leave the surface. On the other hand, if we imagine that the same rubber band has somehow been stretched in the appropriate direction around a doughnut, then there is no way of shrinking it to a point without breaking either the rubber band or the doughnut. We say the surface of the apple is "simply connected," but that the surface of the doughnut is not. Poincar, almost a hundred years ago, knew that a two dimensional sphere is essentially characterized by this property of simple connectivity, and asked the corresponding question for the three dimensional sphere (the set of points in four dimensional space at unit distance from the origin). This question turned out to be extraordinarily difficult, and mathematicians have been struggling with it ever since.  Riemann Hypothesis
Some numbers have the special property that they cannot be expressed as the product of two smaller numbers, e.g., 2, 3, 5, 7, etc. Such numbers are called prime numbers, and they play an important role, both in pure mathematics and its applications. The distribution of such prime numbers among all natural numbers does not follow any regular pattern, however the German mathematician G.F.B. Riemann (1826  1866) observed that the frequency of prime numbers is very closely related to the behavior of an elaborate function
?(s) = 1 + 1/2s + 1/3s + 1/4s + ...
called the Riemann Zeta function. The Riemann hypothesis asserts that all interesting solutions of the equation
?(s) = 0
lie on a certain vertical straight line. This has been checked for the first 1,500,000,000 solutions. A proof that it is true for every interesting solution would shed light on many of the mysteries surrounding the distribution of prime numbers.  YangMills Theory
The laws of quantum physics stand to the world of elementary particles in the way that Newton's laws of classical mechanics stand to the macroscopic world. Almost half a century ago, Yang and Mills introduced a remarkable new framework to describe elementary particles using structures that also occur in geometry. Quantum YangMills theory is now the foundation of most of elementary particle theory, and its predictions have been tested at many experimental laboratories, but its mathematical foundation is still unclear. The successful use of YangMills theory to describe the strong interactions of elementary particles depends on a subtle quantum mechanical property called the "mass gap:" the quantum particles have positive masses, even though the classical waves travel at the speed of light. This property has been discovered by physicists from experiment and confirmed by computer simulations, but it still has not been understood from a theoretical point of view. Progress in establishing the existence of the YangMills theory and a mass gap and will require the introduction of fundamental new ideas both in physics and in mathematics.
There is $1 Million for those who can take down one of these nemeses.
Millennium Prize Problems
Accept the past. Live for the present. Look forward to the future.
Robot Fusion
"As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance." John Wheeler
"[A] scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." Richard Feynman
"[P]etabytes of [] data is not the same thing as understanding emergent mechanisms and structures." Jim Crutchfield
 Birch and SwinnertonDyer Conjecture

10022008, 11:24 AM #14

10022008, 11:31 AM #15

10022008, 11:35 AM #16
Disregard just about killed me laughing. I suppose that would make her a nemesis, but frankly, going out laughing at Edahn sounds about right.
eNFJ 4w3 sx/so 468 tritype
Neutral Good
EIIFi subtype, Ethical/Empath, Delta/Beta
RLUEI, Choleric/Melancholic
Inquistive/Limbic
AIS Holland code
Researcher: VDIP
Dramatic>Sensitive>Serious

10022008, 12:04 PM #17
Time was, is, and will be here
Hi all! I really don't have to introduce myself, as you all know me too well. I am Time. I do not have an MBTI type, as I exist outside of the domain of human personality and the defineable.
I didn't have to sign up here to post, for this forum exists in me and operates according to my parameters. As a social interaction eventdriven interface, this forum defines itself by me. In fact, each of you defines yourself by me. Both joy and sadness results simultaneously by my passage. You mark the day you were born by me, and your family will mark the day you died by me. Oh, and you will die. I will see to that. I both define and limit your existence.
Thank me for allowing you to participate in this forum. I hope your posts are efficient and nonsuperfluous, as anything else would mock me. You P's may try, but this cannot be done. You J's think you can control me, but this cannot be done either. Just by reading this, I have taken seconds from your existence.
I hope you will see me around. If not, then you will regret it later.

10022008, 12:08 PM #18
*injects Time with botox*
TAKE THAT!

10022008, 12:09 PM #19
I wish I had a nemesis. Anyone want to be mine? it will be fun.
In no likes experiment.
that is all
i dunno what else to say so

10022008, 12:18 PM #20"We grow up thinking that beliefs are something to be proud of, but they're really nothing but opinions one refuses to reconsider. Beliefs are easy. The stronger your beliefs are, the less open you are to growth and wisdom, because "strength of belief" is only the intensity with which you resist questioning yourself. As soon as you are proud of a belief, as soon as you think it adds something to who you are, then you've made it a part of your ego."
Similar Threads

How to introduce yourself without mentioning your job, educational background, etc .
By CleanCuteNFP in forum The BonfireReplies: 38Last Post: 01292013, 01:57 PM 
What type is your evil twin/opposite/nemesis?
By yenom in forum The BonfireReplies: 28Last Post: 05062010, 03:47 PM 
Introducing: Your Parents!
By ThatsWhatHeSaid in forum Welcomes and IntroductionsReplies: 77Last Post: 12302009, 11:19 PM 
If your life was a movie and you had a nemesis, what type would he/she be?
By Moiety in forum The BonfireReplies: 38Last Post: 08262009, 03:23 AM