ohhh, banana... you must write like a million times faster than the average person or something to be able to unleash your dribble like that. You better post heaps here, I think we need more ENTPs with your style around. Are you a mathematician?
Can you solve this, rationalize and simplify:
((4 + h)^0.5  2)/h
User Tag List

08232009, 01:47 AM #115 3 9

08232009, 02:36 AM #12
Yes I type fast, somewheres between 80100wps usually, more or less, depends on how much I have to think on it, and whether I get stuck thinking of the right word or not. Happens alot really.
As for the mathematician, I used to be strong in maths, but got bored of them, more interested in the theory than the practice part of it honestly XD
For the answer to the question though, I'm working on it... been a long time since I've had to do this kind of problem. The square root exponent isn't so much the problem, as the annoying variables and lack of anything consistant in the problem is.
Still, lemme see...
((4 + h)^0.5  2)/h
(4+h)^0.5 2 = h
4+h 2^2 = h^2
h=h^2 < at this point it basically is either h=1 or h=0 being the only two possibilities...
h^0.5 = h
(1h)^0.5 = 1h
1^0.5 = 1 < is this step even allowed? O.o
1 = 1^2
1 = 1
I have nooooooooo clue how accurate that is and I'm relatively sure I screwed something up somewhere, but I'm really not sure. It's been aaaaaaages since I've had to play with that kind of maths sadly.
But it came out to a whole number in the end so I'm going to hope that's right XD
EDIT!
DURR! I just realized after posting that I screwed something up that should've saved me a few steps XD
h=h^2
h/h = (h^2)/h
1 = 1^2
1 = 1
Same answer but that makes more sense somehow.
(To give an idea of how long it's been, I had to doublecheck on the definitions of solve, rationalize and simplify...)It doesn't matter if they're right. If they can't proove they're right, then they're wrong. No matter how right they may be.
ALL NEW! (As of 24th June) Demo Reel: Quarter 3!
Photo album now new and improved with KITTENS!
And even more albumness since the last one's full
The full Space Monkey Mafia video (as seen in the demo reel)

08232009, 04:02 AM #13

08232009, 05:15 AM #14
And people say I talk alot...
Men are like parking spaces/the good ones are always taken and the ones left are handicapped or to small.

08232009, 08:06 AM #15
:O ... ummm... Okay... my competence has now been questioned and I'm going to spend the next 5 days trying to type 5 times as fast as I do now
As for the mathematician, I used to be strong in maths, but got bored of them, more interested in the theory than the practice part of it honestly XD
For the answer to the question though, I'm working on it... been a long time since I've had to do this kind of problem. The square root exponent isn't so much the problem, as the annoying variables and lack of anything consistant in the problem is.
Still, lemme see...
((4 + h)^0.5  2)/h
(4+h)^0.5 2 = h
4+h 2^2 = h^2
h=h^2 < at this point it basically is either h=1 or h=0 being the only two possibilities...
h^0.5 = h
(1h)^0.5 = 1h
1^0.5 = 1 < is this step even allowed? O.o
1 = 1^2
1 = 1
I have nooooooooo clue how accurate that is and I'm relatively sure I screwed something up somewhere, but I'm really not sure. It's been aaaaaaages since I've had to play with that kind of maths sadly.
But it came out to a whole number in the end so I'm going to hope that's right XD
EDIT!
DURR! I just realized after posting that I screwed something up that should've saved me a few steps XD
h=h^2
h/h = (h^2)/h
1 = 1^2
1 = 1
Same answer but that makes more sense somehow.
(To give an idea of how long it's been, I had to doublecheck on the definitions of solve, rationalize and simplify...)
The problem with your solution:
1. You can't actually bring an equals sign in like that, unless they tell you that the equation equals, well in this case, one.
Well, the answer is 1/((h+4)^0.5)+2), and it looks like they've rationalized the numerator. I can't do it... I've asked the citizens of Facebook to no avail, so it must be time to find Captain Nemo in the maths thread.5 3 9

08232009, 02:38 PM #16
Actually I originally did it using n for the equals, so if yeu go back and do it this way...
((4 + h)^0.5  2)/h = n (which we know to be true due to being a variable itself, n represents whotever it actually ends up being)
(4+h)^0.5 2 = nh
4+h 2^2 = (nh)^2
h=(nh)^2
h^0.5 = (nh)
(1h)^0.5 = n1h < it's a multiplication so the order doesn't matter, can just break it this way to make more sense
1^0.5 = n1
1 = n1^2
1 = n1
Therefore...
1/1 = n
And 1 = n
So I actually did use the = sign correctly I just forgot to write in the variable I was using sorry >.>;It doesn't matter if they're right. If they can't proove they're right, then they're wrong. No matter how right they may be.
ALL NEW! (As of 24th June) Demo Reel: Quarter 3!
Photo album now new and improved with KITTENS!
And even more albumness since the last one's full
The full Space Monkey Mafia video (as seen in the demo reel)

08232009, 11:12 PM #17
Okay, I asked the maths thread, and Liquid Laser said to just multiply the whole thing by ((4+h)^.5 +2) / ((4+h)^0.5 +2), you can add this because it equals 1, and multiplying anything by one will not change the answer. The entire top line becomes 4 + h  4 (difference of squares square the first term, subtract the square of the second term), then the fours cancel, leaving you with h, and that cancels with the h on the bottom, leaving you with 1/ ((4+h)^0.5 + 2). That's how ye doooo it!!!
___________________________________________
Unfortunately, your n thing doesn't work either, if you have h^0.5=hn, then it will become n = h^0.5
which can then be substituted back into the original:
(4+h)^0.5 2 = h^0.5 * h
(4+h)^0.5 2 = h^0.5
((4 + h)/h)^0.5  2/(h^0.5) = 1
((4 + h)/h)  ((16 + 4h)/(h^3/2))  4/h = 1
4h+h^2 16(h^0.5) + 4(h^3/2)4h=h^2
4(h^3/2)  16(h^0.5) = 0
h^2  4h = 0
h^2 = 4h
h = 4
n= 0.5
hmmm, I think I might have forgot to include a negative somewhere, and that's not really what the question asked, it still surprisingly enough managed to get somewhere eventually5 3 9

08232009, 11:27 PM #18
Alright I'll concede that then XD
One thing does bother me though... this line in the reiteration of it:
(4+h)^0.5 2 = h^0.5 * h
(4+h)^0.5 2 = h^0.5
So uhm.. the extra h just... disappeared to nowheres? O.o; As we haven't proven h = 1 as of yet, that can't be done :o
But still, the above explaination makes alot more sense, I figured it'd be something stupidly easy since I KNOW I spent a whole night for several hours working through problems like this once years ago, and they all were supposed to be really easy with a simple way to do them by cross multiplication and canceling out... which I didn't know so I did each one slowly in the traditional way... which took forever and made a mess of a few of them >.>
Oh well XD
At least now I remember how to do it now that I've been shown again, and understand why it works!
And now I'll never use it again. Ever.It doesn't matter if they're right. If they can't proove they're right, then they're wrong. No matter how right they may be.
ALL NEW! (As of 24th June) Demo Reel: Quarter 3!
Photo album now new and improved with KITTENS!
And even more albumness since the last one's full
The full Space Monkey Mafia video (as seen in the demo reel)

08242009, 03:59 AM #19
 Join Date
 Jun 2008
 MBTI
 INxJ
 Posts
 3,917
Welcome

08242009, 04:45 AM #20
Hi banana
I dont know whats going on but I've just seen this and it doesnt look right :
((4 + h)^0.5  2)/h
(4+h)^0.5 2 = h[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEBvftJUwDw&t=0s[/URL]
Similar Threads

[ENTP] Am I an ENTP or an ENFP?
By BatmanFanatic in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)Replies: 30Last Post: 11152016, 03:56 PM 
Am I an ENFP or an ENTP?
By Huntygox in forum What's my Type?Replies: 13Last Post: 11072016, 02:54 PM 
[NT] Not being able to tell if i'm an INTP or an ENTP
By INTPthinker in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)Replies: 71Last Post: 07232010, 10:42 AM 
Am I an INTP or an ENTP?
By Triglav in forum What's my Type?Replies: 4Last Post: 09272009, 06:13 PM 
[MBTItm] Am I an ENTP or ENFP?
By HeraldofHope in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)Replies: 14Last Post: 06182008, 08:08 PM