User Tag List

First 4567 Last

Results 51 to 60 of 62

  1. #51
    pathwise dependent FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    MBTI
    ENTJ
    Enneagram
    7w8
    Socionics
    ENTj
    Posts
    5,908

    Default

    I can't understand that kind of thinking. Never felt that way (it's also not how relationships pan out in general from where I come from...I'm always shocked about US people moving in with girlfriends / boyfriends after 1-2 months).

    I mean just think about the enormous loss of freedom (months spent bickering) and money (moving in, moving out, finding an apartment, living in a hotel for a while, bla bla) that a failed relationship can cause. Plus all the psychological stress. Much better to wait some, perhaps do some stupid stuff together (like a trip somewhere exotic) but still each one has to have his own life.
    ENTj 7-3-8 sx/sp

  2. #52
    Member Eye of the Potato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Socionics
    IEE
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by badger055 View Post
    Enneagram checks out in the real world for the most part. Socionics does not.



    Well you are looking at a whole forum of ISTP butt sniffers what can I say. It's a tragedy I know. Half are probably mistyped though.



    I don't care please fire at me I enjoy it. Also hurry up and write more Kelly clarkson blog posts chananay I have been waiting.
    Well if you think that the enneagram is spot on, then your understanding of people is chronic. You don't like people though, do you? Well it makes sense then, that your understanding of types is so bad.
    The truth is like a lion. You don't have to defend it. Let it loose. It will defend itself.

  3. #53
    mod love baby... Lady_X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Enneagram
    9w1 sx/so
    Posts
    18,086

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by highlander View Post
    No it's not.
    Yeah no completely not.
    There can’t be any large-scale revolution until there’s a personal revolution, on an individual level. It’s got to happen inside first.
    -Jim Morrison

  4. #54
    Senior Member prplchknz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    MBTI
    yupp
    Posts
    29,776

    Default

    My thought process towards guys:

    Hmmm he seems Interesting

    Guy says something

    If good ok I can talk more

    If bad nevermind he ugly

    Good guy still talking having a nice conversation ooh I want to bang him, probably not that into me. Oh well enjoying the conversation.

  5. #55
    Member Eye of the Potato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Socionics
    IEE
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by badger055 View Post
    Enneagram checks out in the real world for the most part. Socionics does not.





    This sums up what I think about the enneagram.

    http://www.skepdic.com/enneagr.html


    The above Style was said to be mine as a result of a test I took. However, the test came with the following advisory:


    Does this fit you? If it does not, go back over the test, rethink some of your answers and see if you come up with your style. This is not easy. Your enneagram style is an energy you have been using without knowing all your life. You have a vested interest in not knowing this energy because it may slightly alter what you have considered your motivation for many things. Besides, this energy has a down side you may not like to acknowledge.

    If the style doesn't fit, go back and change some answers until it fits but be careful because you may be deceiving yourself when you answered the questions the first time or you may be deceiving yourself with your revisions! Note also how the profile contains several weasel words: 'can be', 'are often', 'tend to', 'can become'. The central feature of the Five is thinking. Nobody needs a personality test to determine if his or her dominant energy, drive, fixation, passion, etc., is the intellectual. Thinkers are observers and intellectuals are often arrogant. This is not a scoop. Nor is it very useful, as is evident by the listing of people who are allegedly all Fives.







    The Enneagram is a circle, meant to symbolise the Cosmos and the "one-ness": this comes from a monist perspective. The Sufis are monists believing that we are all one with each other and with the universe and at the same time pantheists believing that the universe is god.



    Inside the circle is a triangle, and it connects up the points of the 9, the 3 and the 6; and it symbolises God. We should notice right away that it's God inside the cosmos, not the cosmos inside God.



    There's another figure that is 6 sided and it connects from the I to the 4, 4 to the 2, 2 to the 8, 8 to the 5, 5 to the 7 and the 7 back to the I again. And there you have your Enneagram. (Ennea is Greek for "nine").



    It is claimed that the Enneagram is a system revealing nine personality types and it is used in the various workshops and taught in seminaries.



    You claim to hate people talking about us all being connected to the universe, yet you subscribe to the enneagram, which is nothing but spiritual bullshit. And you claim it has more basis in reality than Socionics.

    Beautiful. Just beautiful
    .
    The truth is like a lion. You don't have to defend it. Let it loose. It will defend itself.

  6. #56
    Permabanned
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eye of the Potato View Post
    Well if you think that the enneagram is spot on, then your understanding of people is chronic. You don't like people though, do you? Well it makes sense then, that your understanding of types is so bad.
    I like one on one stuff or close friendships. I do a lot of dating so I get to see this stuff in action. I don't care about the enneagram esoteric stuff I just look at the types. Socionics is made up bullshit as far as I'm concerned.

  7. #57
    Senior Member ceecee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    8w9
    Posts
    9,713

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by badger055 View Post
    Didn't you hear me I already decided to hell with relationships I'm going to make a harem. Going somewhere in a relationship just means you are headed for marriage. Yuck.
    Yes when you can't handle one women, the obvious answer is to add more. If you really think all relationships head in a marriage direction then the best thing for you is no women for awhile. Well, until you figure out that there is more than one actual person in a relationship.
    I like to rock n' roll all night and *part* of every day. I usually have errands... I can only rock from like 1-3.

  8. #58
    Permabanned
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ceecee View Post
    Yes when you can't handle one women, the obvious answer is to add more. If you really think all relationships head in a marriage direction then the best thing for you is no women for awhile. Well, until you figure out that there is more than one actual person in a relationship.
    You guys just don't get the rockstar mentality. You can't "fix" me.


  9. #59
    Member Eye of the Potato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Socionics
    IEE
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by badger055 View Post
    I like one on one stuff or close friendships. I do a lot of dating so I get to see this stuff in action. I don't care about the enneagram esoteric stuff I just look at the types. Socionics is made up bullshit as far as I'm concerned.
    Yeah well I have only one thing to say to that.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iC65ufGUvKM
    The truth is like a lion. You don't have to defend it. Let it loose. It will defend itself.

  10. #60
    Stansmith
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by badger055 View Post
    You guys just don't get the rockstar mentality. You can't "fix" me.

    Good luck.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-03-2009, 06:11 AM
  2. Describe Your Thought Process
    By Costrin in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 05-11-2009, 10:05 PM
  3. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-16-2009, 03:19 AM
  4. My thoughts on the I phone
    By Opivy1980 in forum Science, Technology, and Future Tech
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 07-09-2007, 06:38 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO