User Tag List

First 3456 Last

Results 41 to 50 of 53

  1. #41
    nee andante bechimo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,025

    Default

    Last comment to Falcon. Consider ENTP.

  2. #42
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    MBTI
    ENTJ
    Enneagram
    8w7
    Socionics
    ENTj
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jennifer View Post
    Reminder: This is the SJ section of the site, and as an ENTJ, you're a visitor in it.

    I don't think your posts are having the effect you intended them to have.
    And if they are, that should change ... quickly.

    Thanks.
    For what reason are you saying so?

    Is there any rule saying that members of a certain type aren't allowed to post in other sections?

    On what criteria are you basing your judgment? There is nothing objective.

    ENTJ's are like this. If you don't like it, just create a "typology" -ENTJ central.

    You're an incompetent authority - I should be having your role and I would do a better job.

    Quote Originally Posted by Metaphor View Post
    Last comment to Falcon. Consider ENTP.
    Consider studying the MBTI first before making these kind of comments: your judgment has got no validity, only the test results do. For you, I would say, don't consider any MBTI type: just consider "incompetent".

  3. #43
    Carerra Lu IZthe411's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Posts
    2,591

    Default

    Huh?

    The supposed strategists (ENTJs) created this bull.

    SJs are supposed to blindly follow along and uphold what's dished.

    Not the case.

  4. #44
    @.~*virinaĉo*~.@ Totenkindly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    MBTI
    FREE
    Enneagram
    594 sx/sp
    Socionics
    LII Ne
    Posts
    42,333

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Falcon View Post
    For what reason are you saying so?
    Is there any rule saying that members of a certain type aren't allowed to post in other sections?
    On what criteria are you basing your judgment? There is nothing objective.
    ENTJ's are like this. If you don't like it, just create a "typology" -ENTJ central.
    You're an incompetent authority - I should be having your role and I would do a better job.
    That's better.
    I was rather disappointed you had just rolled over and given up, the first time.

    Behaving as you are in a designated area of the forum for SJ concerns, in the style you're choosing to consistently use, amounts to trolling. As a new member (with 45 posts), that's not a great way to start.

    Consider this your informal warning.
    "Hey Capa -- We're only stardust." ~ "Sunshine"

    “Pleasure to me is wonder—the unexplored, the unexpected, the thing that is hidden and the changeless thing that lurks behind superficial mutability. To trace the remote in the immediate; the eternal in the ephemeral; the past in the present; the infinite in the finite; these are to me the springs of delight and beauty.” ~ H.P. Lovecraft

  5. #45
    Tempbanned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    6w5 sx/so
    Posts
    8,162

    Default

    That-a-way, Jen!

    I don't think he'll dare act up anymore...

    I bet this is the last we'll see of Juror #3 and his inane threads...

  6. #46
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    MBTI
    ENTJ
    Enneagram
    8w7
    Socionics
    ENTj
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IZthe411 View Post
    Huh?

    The supposed strategists (ENTJs) created this bull.

    SJs are supposed to blindly follow along and uphold what's dished.

    Not the case.
    Of course it's not the case - this is exactly why it's important to come and argue in this thread.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jennifer View Post
    That's better.
    I was rather disappointed you had just rolled over and given up, the first time.

    Behaving as you are in a designated area of the forum for SJ concerns, in the style you're choosing to consistently use, amounts to trolling. As a new member (with 45 posts), that's not a great way to start.

    Consider this your informal warning.
    I understand your motivation to step in and assert authority just to make sure that "this fellow is kept in line". But, seriously, you can't just play with your role like this if it doesn't agree with logic. There has to be a reason, otherwise you're just throwing oil on fire.

    Quote Originally Posted by Zarathustra View Post
    That-a-way, Jen!

    I don't think he'll dare act up anymore...

    I bet this is the last we'll see of Juror #3 and his inane threads...
    Ah!! A connaisseur :-) Excellent.

  7. #47
    Tempbanned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    6w5 sx/so
    Posts
    8,162

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Falcon View Post
    I understand your motivation to step in and assert authority just to make sure that "this fellow is kept in line". But, seriously, you can't just play with your role like this if it doesn't agree with logic. There has to be a reason, otherwise you're just throwing oil on fire.


    Quote Originally Posted by Falcon View Post
    Ah!! A connaisseur :-) Excellent.
    It's spelled "connoisseur"

    And that's scientific.

  8. #48
    Senior Member bcubchgo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    MBTI
    ENTJ
    Enneagram
    3w4
    Posts
    164

    Default

    dude has been a pain in the keister since day one. I actually am beginning to believe that he's not really an ENTJ, but someone putting on airs to try to be one based on some sort of script. If he is actually one, then he's got a terrible attitude.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    SCOEI / Inquisitive

  9. #49
    Tempbanned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Enneagram
    8w9
    Posts
    14,031

    Default


  10. #50
    Permabanned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    MBTI
    ISFP
    Enneagram
    6w7 sx
    Socionics
    SEE Fi
    Posts
    25,301

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Falcon View Post
    I can't believe you people are still using old methods over and over again.

    You need to be basing your rules on scientific research, not on traditions!

    POLICY N°1: Formal hiring. Forget about social networks and clubs, we need to have people hired based on jobs posted publically.
    Sounds like hatred of Fe vs. hatred of SJ hiring techniques.

    POLICY N°2: Competence overrides experience. It does not matter how experienced you are if you can do the job better!
    While this may be true in some cases, firing people or treating them poorly just because they're old and not fresh from univsersity is Te obnoxiousness.

    POLICY N°3: No chit-chat at coffee machine. All of this talk is inefficient and it would be better to get down to work instead.
    Oh. You just hate Fs.

    So why is this in the SJ section again?

Similar Threads

  1. Dumping one set of beliefs for what appears like more crazy or zany ones?
    By Survive & Stay Free in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-26-2013, 06:23 AM
  2. Is there a favorite TV show of yours that you are addicted to?
    By aesor in forum Popular Culture and Type
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-27-2011, 01:17 PM
  3. A round of applause for our new mods...
    By Ivy in forum Official Decrees
    Replies: 94
    Last Post: 06-07-2010, 05:05 PM
  4. Replies: 37
    Last Post: 07-27-2009, 12:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO