User Tag List

First 4567816 Last

Results 51 to 60 of 240

Thread: SJs & sex

  1. #51
    pathwise dependent FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    MBTI
    ENTJ
    Enneagram
    7w8
    Socionics
    ENTj
    Posts
    5,908

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by illume View Post
    If libido is not type related then why would cheating/fidelity be type related?
    It's very simple: because libido and cheating aren't necessarily related.
    ENTj 7-3-8 sx/sp

  2. #52
    Striving for balance Little Linguist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    MBTI
    xNFP
    Posts
    6,885

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG View Post
    It's very simple: because libido and cheating aren't necessarily related.
    This is true.
    If you are interested in language, words, linguistics, or foreign languages, check out my blog and read, post, and/or share.

  3. #53
    Junior Member Mesma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    MBTI
    INTP
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by illume View Post
    If libido is not type related then why would cheating/fidelity be type related? It seems that it is easy to say that SJ's will not cheat..... Would a person not cheat to have sex?? Would this cheating at least some of the time not be related to satisfying the libido? Would you trust an ISFJ male more than an ESTP male with your date if she looked like Charlize Theron and they were alone together??
    Especially in the cheating case, I think that it isn't really a crave for more sex (high libido) but instead the fantasy of having sex 'behind their partner's back'. With fidelity, the person may feel more comfortable having sex with their partner thus filling a sexual desire of sorts. This is what makes them type related, as with cheating a person that loves to take risks may get a 'buzz' out of that, whilst a more conservative person finds comfort in the concept of fidelity.

  4. #54
    Permabanned
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    MBTI
    xkcd
    Enneagram
    9w1 sx/sp
    Socionics
    INT_
    Posts
    10,733

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Magic Poriferan View Post
    That's entirely subjective.

    Peguy has done a good job here of revealing one pre-supposition after another. It's odd how many narrow assumptions you have. It's actually pretty ironic... The people who seem to represent sexual liberalism... being dismissive of other sexual practices.
    Boring is boring.

    I'm sure boring people find other boring people interesting, but non-boring people don't.

    In conclusion, if you suck in bed, stick with other people that suck in bed.

  5. #55
    Member illume's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Enneagram
    4w3
    Socionics
    enfp
    Posts
    89

    Default

    But they sure are a lot of the time!!!!!

  6. #56
    Striving for balance Little Linguist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    MBTI
    xNFP
    Posts
    6,885

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MacGuffin View Post
    Boring is boring.

    I'm sure boring people find other boring people interesting, but non-boring people don't.

    In conclusion, if you suck in bed, stick with other people that suck in bed.
    Define 'suck in bed.'

    (Just because my Te is now activated).

    Nahhhh, just kidding. But seriously, dude, you're being silly.
    If you are interested in language, words, linguistics, or foreign languages, check out my blog and read, post, and/or share.

  7. #57
    Sniffles
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MacGuffin View Post
    Boring is boring.

    I'm sure boring people find other boring people interesting, but non-boring people don't.

    In conclusion, if you suck in bed, stick with other people that suck in bed.
    I find your posts boring.

  8. #58
    pathwise dependent FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    MBTI
    ENTJ
    Enneagram
    7w8
    Socionics
    ENTj
    Posts
    5,908

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by illume View Post
    But they sure are a lot of the time!!!!!
    Nope.
    ENTj 7-3-8 sx/sp

  9. #59
    Striving for balance Little Linguist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    MBTI
    xNFP
    Posts
    6,885

    Default

    Good grief, does anyone have any proof for any of these odd conjectures that are floating around like marmelade clouds on a powder puff?
    If you are interested in language, words, linguistics, or foreign languages, check out my blog and read, post, and/or share.

  10. #60
    Senior Member Bella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    MBTI
    ISTJ
    Posts
    1,510

    Default

    Yes, good grief...
    yesiknowimamiserablegrouchnowgoawayovmeleor

    It's Mizzz ST, thank you...

Similar Threads

  1. [SJ] A theory about SJs and mistyping
    By Zeego in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 12-13-2016, 03:42 PM
  2. Ducks and sex "arms race"
    By rivercrow in forum Science, Technology, and Future Tech
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-15-2014, 01:53 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO