User Tag List

First 91718192021 Last

Results 181 to 190 of 240

Thread: SJs & sex

  1. #181
    Junior Member bloodyfungus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    MBTI
    INTP
    Posts
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chimpuloc View Post
    With the whole nurturing side of an ISFJ coming out, the experience is rich and filled with intimacy that, personally, assures a connection of closeness in that moment. Knowing that the person you're sleeping with is willing to have sex with you automatically sets a strong sense of trust and bond.
    I love that.
    I get this impression with mine too. I think there is a lot more sensuousness having sex with an ISFJ. I've had a more active sex life with other types (my ex was an ENFP) but I don't think the connection during the "act" itself has been as strong.

    To know that my partner can be so "nurturing" (as you put it) makes me feel like the only person on earth sometimes and makes me feel very special...
    Yes, you are unique......just like everyone else

  2. #182
    Habitual Fi LineStepper JocktheMotie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,193

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hmm View Post
    ^What about non-sexual affection?
    Not as much as myself really. Huggy and stuff when it's traditionally called for but will never initiate physical contact. She will rarely kiss me "for the hell of it," that burden [well not really much of one I suppose but feels that way sometimes] falls to me, and she has a very strong idea of what her role is as a woman in the realm of the physical relationship. She feels I as the male hold all the power and responsibility in that regard. It's very Puritan and I really don't get it.



  3. #183
    Permabanned
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    MBTI
    xkcd
    Enneagram
    9w1 sx/sp
    Socionics
    INT_
    Posts
    10,733

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bloodyfungus View Post
    I think there is a lot more sensuousness having sex with an ISFJ.

  4. #184
    No moss growing on me Giggly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    MBTI
    iSFj
    Enneagram
    2 sx/so
    Posts
    9,666

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bloodyfungus View Post
    I get this impression with mine too. I think there is a lot more sensuousness having sex with an ISFJ. I've had a more active sex life with other types (my ex was an ENFP) but I don't think the connection during the "act" itself has been as strong.

    To know that my partner can be so "nurturing" (as you put it) makes me feel like the only person on earth sometimes and makes me feel very special...
    Awww that's sweet.

    Quote Originally Posted by JocktheMotie View Post
    Not as much as myself really. Huggy and stuff when it's traditionally called for but will never initiate physical contact. She will rarely kiss me "for the hell of it," that burden [well not really much of one I suppose but feels that way sometimes] falls to me, and she has a very strong idea of what her role is as a woman in the realm of the physical relationship. She feels I as the male hold all the power and responsibility in that regard. It's very Puritan and I really don't get it.
    This confuses me. As a female, I have a difficult time imagining myself not being physically affectionate in a non-sexual way with someone I love. I really don't know what to make of it.

  5. #185
    heart on fire
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,457

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by illume View Post
    The horny guy whose wife only wants sex three times a year?? Don't kid yourself!! I have had friends who told me that they hated having sex with their husbands..... Twice a year was enough for them.
    I know women who say this too only twice a year they would consider excessive. They do happen to be SJ, but I would hesitate to use that as any "proof" about SJ sexuality because these are some really repressed people.

  6. #186
    Perfect Gentleman! =D d@v3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    ISTJ
    Posts
    2,830

    Post

    My perspective of the male SJ.... personally we might be SJ's, but we're still guys!

    Not sure about females SJ's. Nor am I sure about gay SJ's- I'm not even sure if there ARE gay SJ's because SJ's are the traditional type right?
    Freedom Isn't Free. [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  7. #187
    resonance entropie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    MBTI
    entp
    Enneagram
    783
    Posts
    16,761

    Default

    ouh my, I just read "SJs and sex" and drunk 15ten beer already... I was holding on so far, but now the wall has to feel vomitted on
    [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEBvftJUwDw&t=0s[/URL]

  8. #188

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peguy View Post
    A hallmark of a mature person is the ability to limit one's options to the appropriate ones. It's usually immature people who want their cake and eat it too.
    That is brilliant! I agree wholeheartedly. I wish I could become a hindu god and high five u with more than two hands.

    I'm an SJ, and I suppose I'm a tad conservative. But by that I mean, I'm not living some day-to-day crazed porno adventure lol. We just aren't sexually frivolous. I will only have sex with one person, and if I decide to start relations with someone else, then I will stop having sex with the previous person and start with the next and be monogamous. I'm not interested in multiple partners or orgies, lol. But that's about it. If its with one person, especially when I get more comfortable, I will blow that person away. Seriously, they wonder what the hell happened to whatever sweet innocent person they thought they were involved with lol.

    All the conservativeness that is outlined, becomes completely UNconservative with that one person. Wild. Its not like SJ's throw down a sheet, cut a hole, go at it and pray it ends quickly lol. I'm proud to be a monogamous "freak". We are just picky with who gets to enjoy it, and who we think can handle it.

    We spend our time doing it right, we make sure to take whatever time and effort is necessary to make it hot and memorable, romantic when it seems right. Maybe that's the whole "nurturer" thing. But then again, there will always be the prude SJ's, or prude of any types, so I can't speak for anyone. But I can speak for me! ;-)
    Last edited by earthangel; 02-09-2009 at 03:35 PM.
    "Being right too soon is socially unacceptable."
    -Robert A. Heinlein

  9. #189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by earthangel View Post
    I'm an SJ, and I suppose I'm a tad conversative. But by that I mean, I'm not living some day-to-day crazed porno adventure lol. We just aren't sexually frivolous. I will only have sex with one person, and if I decide to start relations with someone else, then I will stop having sex with the previous person and start with the next and be monogamous. I'm not interested in multiple partners or orgies, lol. But that's about it. If its with one person, especially when I get more comfortable, I will blow that person away. Seriously, they wonder what the hell happened to whatever sweet innocent person they thought they were involved with lol.
    Here I was thinking there was something wrong with me because I never daydreamed about having threesomes or anything of the sort. I've always preferred the one-on-one interaction.

  10. #190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by QuentinBeck View Post
    Here I was thinking there was something wrong with me because I never daydreamed about having threesomes or anything of the sort. I've always preferred the one-on-one interaction.
    Aww, no. I think its normal for us, to look for something close and fulfilling to enjoy it, and that we can't truly if its detached and for sport. I don't think its a bad thing to not want a threesome, lol.
    "Being right too soon is socially unacceptable."
    -Robert A. Heinlein

Similar Threads

  1. [SJ] A theory about SJs and mistyping
    By Zeego in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 12-13-2016, 03:42 PM
  2. Ducks and sex "arms race"
    By rivercrow in forum Science, Technology, and Future Tech
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-15-2014, 01:53 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO