[NT] NT Rationale Classics Nominations

[ThatsWhatHeSaid]

We're looking for the classic threads in this particular subforum. "Classic" in the sense of most memorable and best representing the subforum.

What you do: Post a link to your favorite thread or state clearly the name of the thread you're nominating for the classics. Choose one thread only. If you'd like to give an explanation of why you chose the thread, go for it, but state the thread you are nominating at the beginning of the post and try and keep the back and forth conversation to a minimum, otherwise I'll have to go Zerg on this mofo. Sorry to SJ, but I don't want to make it easier for Mempy to sift through the thread to tally the votes.

Example:

"http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/fe...-classics.html

I chose this thread because it has classic written all over it. This thread is undeniably full of awesome."

 

[colmena]

Can the exclamation marks fuck off?

 

[ThatsWhatHeSaid]

Can the exclamation marks fuck off?

You mean these?

...No.

 

[substitute]

Damn you. I just nominated the sensotard thread in the other one before I saw you'd done one of these for each subforum! :steam:

 

[Jack Flak]

I nominate splitting colmena's post into a new thread, and promoting it to Classic status.

 

[Oberon]

I know it's gone now, but Seasons of Mist was a classic, if only by way of its sheer volume.

Seasons of Mist.

wherever it is...

 

[INA]

You are a mischievous mouse.

 

[Oberon]

You are a mischievous mouse.

...and that's the least of it!

 

[substitute]

Okay, here you go again then,
http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/nt-rationale/8573-sensotard-moments.html
Because it's funny and can continue being added to and just gets funnier with each addition

 

[Economica]

INTJ intimidation

It's not a thread I'm personally proud of (Mendacity, if you ever read this, I'm so sorry, truly!) but that's the one that came to mind.

 

[substitute]

I can't find that "War of objectivity" one, but it was a real classic if I remember rightly...

 

[Economica]

I can't find that "War of objectivity" one, but it was a real classic if I remember rightly...

I thought of that one too, but I totally followed the rules and limited myself to one nomination.

 

[substitute]

I thought of that one too, but I totally followed the rules and limited myself to one nomination.

Oh. Oops. I didn't spot that part. Was it a sensotard moment, or flagrant NP disregard for rules? Or am I just a spaz?

Someone else nominate it then. Before I send the boys round.

 

[Fuent]

I nominate splitting colmena's post into a new thread, and promoting it to Classic status.

I second that.

 

[Usehername]

I just skimmed INTJ Intimidation's first few pages...

this HAS to be one of the options. It begins with thoughtful discussion, and then erodes into demonstrating the whole point of the thread, and not because anyone is trying to be mean, but because there was a whole bunch of INTJs in there!!!

Fantastic.

 

[Athenian200]

I can't find that "War of objectivity" one, but it was a real classic if I remember rightly...

http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/nt-rationale/2619-intp-vs-entp-war-objectivity.html

I agree with your nomination, Substitute.

 

[Uytuun]

Bluewing vs. Feelers

Hell, anything by BW.

 

[ConchShell]

The "Sensotard Moments" thread. Hilarious! Glad I'm not the only one...!

 

[Lucifer]

ENTJs, Maybe just misunderstood ?

It's got it all.

 

[Liason]

INTJ's of course. Have you seen that page we made? It's bloody brilliant.