User Tag List

View Poll Results: Who is more "robotic": INTJs or INTPs?

Voters
109. You may not vote on this poll
  • INTPs

    42 38.53%
  • INTJs

    67 61.47%
First 5678917 Last

Results 61 to 70 of 355

  1. #61
    Riva
    Guest

    Default

    but, if @Riva didn't feel the need to go flashing his Fe rulebook all over the place
    I wasn't shoving my rule book up your ass.

    You called someone's opinion idiotic.

    I pointed out that since you yourself made it an open ended OP (which you later changed) one had the right to come up with their own interpretation of what robotic meant.

    And then Fluffy came and gave a good description of what robotic is.

    Then you suddenly realized that your OP doesn't have to be open ended therefore changed the OP to fluffy's opinion of what robotic meant.

    You didn't stop there. You continued to call people's opinions which didn't share Fluffy's point on view of what robotic was as idiotic. And by then you have claimed this to be your own point of view on what robotic was.

    It's Ti not Fe.

    Typical Zara.

  2. #62
    Nips away your dignity Fluffywolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    9 sp/sx
    Posts
    9,422

    Default

    To be fair though Riva, the fact you are still argueing, in spite of early agreement with the established definition of what robot-like means, is because of your Fe.

    Whilest Zara is just being an INTJ responding to all posts in the thread he made to the best of his ability.
    ~Self-depricating Megalomaniacal Superwolf

  3. #63
    Tempbanned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    6w5 sx/so
    Posts
    8,162

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by greenfairy View Post
    Actually a spade is a collection of molecules (which are made up of atoms, which are made of electrons around a nucleus, which is essentially energy + space) which is arranged in a certain way and given a label by a being using language. In Spanish it's pala, and in Japanese it's スペード.
    You know that question you've been struggling with for so long?

    You're an INTP.

    Quote Originally Posted by greenfairy View Post
    Zarathustra:
    I have to agree with Riva...
    I could not give a small-enough shit.

    Quote Originally Posted by greenfairy View Post
    ...your lack of clarity does not imply a flaw in the reader's reasoning.
    Not to split hairs, but my perspective is very clear, so, if anything, it would not be my lack of clarity, it would be the OP's lack of clarity.

    Second, I never said it was the lack of clarity in the OP that implied a flaw in the reader's reasoning.

    I said the reasoning in a particular responder's post was poor.

    Quote Originally Posted by greenfairy View Post
    Perhaps you should take the advice on this INTJ page into consideration:
    http://www.personalitypage.com/INTJ.html
    Particularly this:
    "...It is not easy for the INTJ to express their internal images, insights, and abstractions. The internal form of the INTJ's thoughts and concepts is highly individualized, and is not readily translatable into a form that others will understand. However, the INTJ is driven to translate their ideas into a plan or system that is usually readily explainable, rather than to do a direct translation of their thoughts. They usually don't see the value of a direct transaction, and will also have difficulty expressing their ideas, which are non-linear. However, their extreme respect of knowledge and intelligence will motivate them to explain themselves to another person who they feel is deserving of the effort.
    I have long been familiar with that profile.

    It really doesn't apply here.

    This is something altogether different.

    I really have no difficulty expressing my opinions on this matter.

    I left some openness to the thread intentionally and on purpose.

    When something dumb was said, I called it out as such.

    Then Riva felt the need to bust out his Fe rulebook.

    He's tried this before, and, frankly, I don't care for it.

    Quote Originally Posted by greenfairy View Post
    Just sayin.
    As am I.

  4. #64
    Riva
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fluffywolf View Post
    To be fair though Riva, the fact you are still argueing, in spite of early agreement with the established definition of what robot-like means, is because of your Fe.
    I made my point. He continued to argue on it. I enjoying a good argument as always, carried on.

  5. #65
    Nips away your dignity Fluffywolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    9 sp/sx
    Posts
    9,422

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riva View Post
    I made my point. He continued to argue on it. I enjoying a good argument as always, carried on.
    Oh, I wasn't aware you thought of this as good discussion.

    In that case carry on.
    ~Self-depricating Megalomaniacal Superwolf

  6. #66
    royal member Rasofy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    5w6 sp/sx
    Posts
    5,932

    Default

    Pro Tip: ''Efficient'' and ''robotic'' are parameters that are not necessarily linked.
    -----------------

    A man builds. A parasite asks 'Where is my share?'
    A man creates. A parasite says, 'What will the neighbors think?'
    A man invents. A parasite says, 'Watch out, or you might tread on the toes of God... '


    -----------------

  7. #67
    Nips away your dignity Fluffywolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    9 sp/sx
    Posts
    9,422

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rasofy View Post
    Pro Tip: ''Efficient'' and ''robotic'' are parameters that are not necessarily linked.
    Quoted for truth.
    ~Self-depricating Megalomaniacal Superwolf

  8. #68
    Riva
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fluffywolf View Post
    Oh, I wasn't aware you thought of this as good discussion.

    In that case carry on.
    You wouldn't enjoy such a discussion especially which the conclusion is reached based on breaking things down to the core?????

    You call yourself an INTP (or IXTP)? Shame on you!!!!!!!!!!!

  9. #69
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    5w6 sx/so
    Socionics
    Will
    Posts
    5,927

    Default

    I see perhaps I was wrong about ISTP being the most robotic type, because I am ISTP and this thread has me boiling in anger, and emotional reactions like that are for sentient creatures rather than robots.

  10. #70
    Tempbanned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    6w5 sx/so
    Posts
    8,162

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riva View Post
    I wasn't shoving my rule book up your ass.
    No, you were trying to.

    I certainly won't be having that, though.

    Quote Originally Posted by Riva View Post
    You called someone's opinion idiotic.

    I pointed out that since you yourself made it an open ended OP (which you later changed) one had the right to come up with their own interpretation of what robotic meant.

    And then Fluffy came and gave a good description of what robotic is.

    Then you suddenly realized that your OP doesn't have to be open ended therefore changed the OP to fluffy's opinion of what robotic meant.

    You didn't stop there. You continued to call people's opinions which didn't share Fluffy's point on view of what robotic was as idiotic. And by then you have claimed this to be your own point of view on what robotic was.
    I'm not even gunna deal with the blatant misreadings evidenced in this post, as all you've done here is hamper potentially worthwhile discussion.

    I left it open-ended intentionally, to spur discussion on what it means to be robotic. I know you have difficulty keeping up with some of the most obvious information on this forum, so I suppose I should not be surprised that you would not know that this is something I often do in threads I start. That I merely start a thread in a relatively open-ended manner does not require me to accept any and all definitions that are offered. If a definition is idiotic, then I can call it so. If a definition is brilliant and gets right to the core of an issue, I can say as much. These are the rules I play by. And your belief that I must accept all definitions proposed is your Fe rulebook. As you should realize by now, I don't care for it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Riva View Post
    It's Ti not Fe.

    Typical Zara.
    No, it's subconscious Fe, and you just don't realize it.

    Typical Riva.

Similar Threads

  1. [E6] Who is more skeptical of people? 6 or 8?
    By NK258 in forum Enneatypes
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-23-2015, 02:36 PM
  2. [MBTItm] Any other NTs here who are more into NFs than NTs?
    By gandalf in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-01-2012, 08:26 AM
  3. [NT] BEST Critic: INTJ or INTP?
    By Afkan in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 126
    Last Post: 06-29-2009, 01:16 AM
  4. [NT] INTJ or INTP: Who is more misanthropic?
    By ajblaise in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 05-27-2009, 08:10 AM
  5. is this INTJ or INTP?
    By 527468 in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-11-2009, 08:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO