Ooooo you can use (and misspell) a big word. You must feel pretty proud of yourself.
So, I can interact with the world primarily through direct, rational/logical control, or I can observe by intuitively taking in what I see, but I cannot do both? Sure, both at the same time is unlikely, but we have a fourth dimension. I can perform either function depending on what the situation calls for or whichever I want to do. Again, if you'll get your mind out of black-and-white-ville, you might see this.
Also, which letters form the most important distinction depends entirely on for what you're hoping to use such a distinction. For example, if you're looking for someone to come up with something new or see subtle nuances, then N/S is your primary distinction.
Yep. I'm glad too. Good to know we've both taken the advice "Don't get mad; get GLAD!" to heart.
So tonight I have encountered a self-described INTx who has never read Jung, and apparently neither Beebe nor Lenore Thomson either. But he's talking to me about things not being black and white.
If you understood personality theory, you'd know it actually makes more sense to say you're IxTP or xNTP than INTx.
You'd also understand that an INTJ most certainly wouldn't be comfortable running around with such uncertainty for years at a time, even if you go with MBTI or Keirsey instead.
You don't know the definition of emotional intelligence, and you accuse me of black and white thinking, but then point out a minor misspelling in a word instead of reacting to content.
This indicates to me INTP as well, terrible Ti/Si loop nit-picky thing that's common for you guys.
I majored in English Lit, btw, and had a 3.9 GPA in college. The fact that you're talking down to me like I'm an idiot while you sit there and attempt to speak with authority about things you haven't even studied lets me know just how brilliant you are. Yes, you're so SMRT.
You're exactly the kind of NT I was talking about in my original post. It's absolutely hilarious. Thank you sir for the marvelous example.