There is a difference of dealing with emotions internally and extrovert them. A robot is indifferent. I won't assign that quality to Js or to any human.I'm not following. They are even bigger robots.
There is a difference of dealing with emotions internally and extrovert them. A robot is indifferent. I won't assign that quality to Js or to any human.I'm not following. They are even bigger robots.
There is a difference of dealing with emotions internally and extrovert them. A robot is indifferent. I won't assign that quality to Js.
I edited my reply ...to any human....Better watch out!
INTPs have Si as their third function, so nostalgia and sentimentality can often be quite important to us.
I'd say enneagram would help with some of your issues. You sound like a nine, not bad and intp's have a little tendency towards nine if Fe is developed, or hyper active (not unhealthy).
First, thanks for the replies. I never thought I'd get a response so quickly!
1. I usually base it on fact; however, depending on the situation I always feel rude or guilty when making a decision conflicting with friends and family.
2. Male; that may be the case, too.
Interesting....that's how I feel whenever I see a person being really emotional [crying, yelling, singing, etc.] to me or around me. I have trouble saying "I l*ve you" to people, too.
For the T's out there, do you guys often ask for second opinions? I tend to do that because I love having options (my lovely "P"), but deep inside, I kind of already know what I want.
In the new groups Keirsey introduced in Portraits of Temperament:Can you explain this more?
Why don't you try to think of something new yourself?In the new groups Keirsey introduced in Portraits of Temperament:
Role-informative: NFP, NTP, SFJ, SFP; Role directive: STJ, STP, NTJ, NFJ.
By dividing them by I/E, you get the four Interaction Styles of Linda Berens: Chart the Course (introverted, directive): IST/INJ, Behind the Scenes (introverted, informative): ISF/INP, In Charge (extraverted, directive): EST/ENJ, and Get Things Going (extraverted, informative): ESF/ENP.
In these groups, notice that Directive/Informative ends up being distinguished by T/F for the S's, and J/P for the N's.
Where on the S side, all T's end up as directive while F is informative, on the N side, the P makes the type informative even if it is a T. Informative is people(rather than task)-oriented and thus softer and a bit more accepting of others. This is often associated with F behavior, so then NTP's might seem a bit like F's in that respect, adding to the ambiguity a lot of NP seekers often face.
Yes there is. I am an XXXX, all types and non. At the same time. How is that for a paradox? Please don't ask me what it's like.
You're an INFP. An INTP is primarly a truth seeker. It's not that INTPs don't take peoples feelings into consideration. It's just that in the greater scheme of things it's more important to state the truth. People will have to deal with emotional difficulties on their own. It's not the responsibility of the INTP.
It's usually about the 10th time someone gets INTP on a test that they break down, hit a mental wall, lay around for a few days, reject MBTI, then put INTP in their profile type.
In the new groups Keirsey introduced in Portraits of Temperament:
Role-informative: NFP, NTP, SFJ, SFP; Role directive: STJ, STP, NTJ, NFJ.
By dividing them by I/E, you get the four Interaction Styles of Linda Berens: Chart the Course (introverted, directive): IST/INJ, Behind the Scenes (introverted, informative): ISF/INP, In Charge (extraverted, directive): EST/ENJ, and Get Things Going (extraverted, informative): ESF/ENP.
In these groups, notice that Directive/Informative ends up being distinguished by T/F for the S's, and J/P for the N's.
Where on the S side, all T's end up as directive while F is informative, on the N side, the P makes the type informative even if it is a T. Informative is people(rather than task)-oriented and thus softer and a bit more accepting of others. This is often associated with F behavior, so then NTP's might seem a bit like F's in that respect, adding to the ambiguity a lot of NP seekers often face.
What if someone does all the 4 directions simultaneously? Or just chills, and do non. Why do you focus on the preference? Do most people follow their preference? What if they don't?Why do you need something new right now? It's a good explanation that explains the T/F uncertainty people like this face.
(What's "new" in this is the way I use it to express the types as social/leadership temperament blends).
You are right in that I am not a thing.Wrong. There is no such thing as XXXX
http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/mbti-tm-other-personality-matrices/37355-unique-mbti-faq.html
You're probably thinking of the extroversion as "people" focus.I also don't know if this classification is wholly accurate. I am an ENJ so "in charge" and that makes me task oriented by definition but in life I am people oriented. Especially good at being task and people oriented ha? (Is that a possiblity.. )
People might do all four, but still, type indicates that there is one they actually prefer (however slightly).What if someone does all the 4 directions simultaneously? Or just chills, and do non. Why do you focus on the preference? Do most people follow their preference? What if they don't?
I see your point. And after those 4 directions it's a good explanation. But it's simplified to such a degree that it is close to useless imo. And expecting someone to follow such a pattern is prone to failure. Creating more communication difficulties then if one keeps an open mind.