Anyone with even a very mild understanding of feminist theory could have a field day with the tone and implications of that post (not your's, X, Bowden's. Part of me wonders if it was intentionally really misogynistic when he said women are like objects that depreciate in value and men aren't).
Jonnyboy, between your extremely laconic nature and your tendency to communicate mostly by adding emphasis to previous posts, I usually feel like I know what you're trying to convey, but I'm never sure.
Obesity, age, kids, higher status, and CPD (chihuahua personality disorder).
Kids are radioactive; only a real chump would want to raise another man's litter!
Obesity is obvious.
Age is less obvious, at least to women, who think men look at women the way women look at men. Unlike men, women are like cars-- they depreciate in value over time. Many women seem like used cars, especially once they hit thirty.
Higher status-- if a woman makes more dinero than me, that's a total turnoff. Women are the same way, but in reverse-- if a woman is "secure" with dating a lower status guy, then she's likely not playing with a full deck.
Use your imagination for the chihuahua.
Really hoping you're just trolling. Oy, vey. Let me amend your list for you:
Insecure 20 year-old gym rat with daddy issues.
Ability to make me a sammich.
Ability to look adoringly at me while I pontificate about "how things are."