User Tag List

First 34567 Last

Results 41 to 50 of 78

  1. #41
    What is, is. Arthur Schopenhauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    5
    Socionics
    INTj
    Posts
    1,158

    Default

    Forzen, are you trying to reduce the OPs use of infinity through division of infinity by infinity?
    INTJ | 5w4 - Sp/Sx/So | 5-4-(9/1) | RLoEI | Melancholic-Choleric | Johari & Nohari

    This will not end well...
    But it will at least be poetic, I suppose...

    Hmm... But what if it does end well?
    Then I suppose it will be a different sort of poetry, a preferable sort...
    A sort I could become accustomed to...



  2. #42
    Senior Member durentu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    5w4
    Socionics
    INTp
    Posts
    413

    Default

    send 1/2 to both fronts and let the third be forfeit.
    "People often say that this or that person has not yet found himself. But the self is not something one finds; it is something one creates." - Thomas Szasz

  3. #43
    Senior Member forzen's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Socionics
    X/0
    Posts
    547

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentMind View Post
    Forzen, are you trying to reduce the OPs use of infinity through division of infinity by infinity?
    I'm not trying to reduce anything, I just found those sentences I bolded in those quotes to be highly entertaining for some reason. Maybe you could tell me?
    This post grammatical errors had been intentionally left uncorrected.

  4. #44
    What is, is. Arthur Schopenhauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    5
    Socionics
    INTj
    Posts
    1,158

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by forzen View Post
    I'm not trying to reduce anything, I just found those sentences I bolded in those quotes to be highly entertaining for some reason. Maybe you could tell me?
    No?
    INTJ | 5w4 - Sp/Sx/So | 5-4-(9/1) | RLoEI | Melancholic-Choleric | Johari & Nohari

    This will not end well...
    But it will at least be poetic, I suppose...

    Hmm... But what if it does end well?
    Then I suppose it will be a different sort of poetry, a preferable sort...
    A sort I could become accustomed to...



  5. #45
    Senior Member forzen's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Socionics
    X/0
    Posts
    547

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentMind View Post
    No?
    Since you insist on taking me to school.

    infinity = infinity
    1/2 (infinity) = 1/2 (infinity)
    1/4 (infinity) = 1/4 (infinity)

    Regardless of how much you divide a number going forever, if their equal their going to be the same number.

    You deduct that 3 and 4 is not the same as infinity. But natural numbers has an infinite amount of numbers between them.

    3 ---> 4 = 3 + (1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 ......)

    So how do you truly know if 1 = 1 if it can go like this:

    1.999999....... and 1.999999......, you wouldn't because there can be an infinite amount of decimals and any decimal along the way may vary along the way that would make that statement untrue. This is the same principle your little wiki page is trying to explain. But, since the OP stated that both armies are equal, then we can deduct that dividing the armies would yield the same amount. So in this case, the OP dictate that f(x) = x. The dependent and independent variable are the same: x = y, then x/y = 1. How could you not see this?
    This post grammatical errors had been intentionally left uncorrected.

  6. #46
    What is, is. Arthur Schopenhauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    5
    Socionics
    INTj
    Posts
    1,158

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by forzen View Post
    Since you insist on taking me to school.

    infinity = infinity
    1/2 (infinity) = 1/2 (infinity)
    1/4 (infinity) = 1/4 (infinity)

    Regardless of how much you divide a number going forever, if their equal their going to be the same number.

    You deduct that 3 and 4 is not the same as infinity. But natural numbers has an infinite amount of numbers between them.

    3 ---> 4 = 3 + (1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 ......)

    So how do you truly know if 1 = 1 if it can go like this:

    1.999999....... and 1.999999......, you wouldn't because there can be an infinite amount of decimals and any decimal along the way may vary along the way that would make that statement untrue. This is the same principle your little wiki page is trying to explain. But, since the OP stated that both armies are equal, then we can deduct that dividing the armies would yield the same amount. So in this case, the OP dictate that f(x) = x. The dependent and independent variable are the same: x = y, then x/y = 1. How could you not see this?
    What the fuck?
    INTJ | 5w4 - Sp/Sx/So | 5-4-(9/1) | RLoEI | Melancholic-Choleric | Johari & Nohari

    This will not end well...
    But it will at least be poetic, I suppose...

    Hmm... But what if it does end well?
    Then I suppose it will be a different sort of poetry, a preferable sort...
    A sort I could become accustomed to...



  7. #47
    Pumpernickel
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    MBTI
    ENTJ
    Posts
    1,960

    Default

    What is wrong with you people and sticking to the word "infinity", it was obviously not literal.

    Quote Originally Posted by durentu View Post
    send 1/2 to both fronts and let the third be forfeit.
    Thats what I thought too

  8. #48
    Pumpernickel
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    MBTI
    ENTJ
    Posts
    1,960

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentMind View Post

    a) It is obvious that you're fighting some imbecile of a warlord, as he randomly sends his troops out to die. (not that their deaths matter, as there is an infinite number) This raises a few questions:

    - How did this dumbshit of a warlord come into power?

    - How does he keep the economy and people under his control?

    - Where do they live, as the universe might not be able to contain an infinte amount of people.
    HA HA

  9. #49
    Senior Member forzen's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Socionics
    X/0
    Posts
    547

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentMind View Post
    What the fuck?
    The same words that came out my mouth when I saw your first post .
    This post grammatical errors had been intentionally left uncorrected.

  10. #50
    Permabanned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Posts
    253

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by forzen View Post
    So all we have to do is divide the total amount of people in the world in half (if it's odd, that unlucky soul would be first blood and would be used to rationalize the war) and use that number to compute the data.
    Infinity has a half point? Please specify.

Similar Threads

  1. [NT] what do you think of this invention?
    By INTJ123 in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-29-2009, 10:51 PM
  2. How do you think?
    By rainoneventide in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-03-2009, 07:48 PM
  3. What do you think about this guy?
    By Wiley45 in forum What's my Type?
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 05-04-2009, 08:26 AM
  4. [INFJ] infjs, what do you think of this? - from an entp
    By velocity in forum The NF Idyllic (ENFP, INFP, ENFJ, INFJ)
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 02-03-2009, 06:26 PM
  5. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 12-11-2008, 04:17 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO