Obviously it's impossible to seriously classify the typology of inanimate objects, but regardless, where do you derive your typology from? You seem to be thinking of Jungian typology in terms other than analytical tools.
Obviously it's impossible to seriously classify the typology of inanimate objects,
Rhinos and Satan are inanimate objects?
"Of course we spent our money in the good times. That's what you're supposed to do in good times! You can't save money in the good times. Then they wouldn't be good times, they'd be 'preparation for the bad times' times."
"Every country in the world owes money. Everyone. So heere's what I dont get: who do they all owe it to, and why don't we just kill the bastard and relax?"
So that's why they have such hard skin... They're golems! anyway, I recommend that this thread stop dicussing rhinos, satan not being a rhinoceros and all... Then again, this thread was simply spawned out of a non-serious observation, so why not?
INTP, Neutral Good/Lawful Good even split. 5w4 sp/sx melancholic/supine, even split. Yes, I stole this method of placement from black cat.