kallach, my opinion is not my own. it's that of jung to begin with. and you know, there are others.
i am only arguing about strait edge logic, dealing with six years ob observation of theory of mind. if that makes me sound ENTj, then i am proud of it. after all i am trans-rational, i should sound rational-inclusive. i am still a perceiver.
what this thread is about: two words: developement, meaning that common people are characterized by their first function and their shadow-peak (like Fe for Ti) more than by their second function. this is my knowledge, not my theory. if you can not see this for your self, you have nothing to judge away this thread nor anything to contribute to it. second word: logic: it is insane to name-call the majority of people by a trait that is not characterizing them at all. if you want to argue with this, have fun - without me.
btw i was an mbti believer for a very long time, i have come a long way or seeking proof. i stood in your place, arguing against the truth, but direct evidence (looking right into people) teached me better.