WHY? why should the a priori form of statistics dominate the observance form of statistics? Why cant xyz group be under represented in wfc, while overrepresented in tyg??? Does every profession, school, test score, etc have to be a mini microcosm of statistical proportion? Why are people so against accepting differences in desires, cultures and priorities?
Yes, there are mean angry old white men who would use what I just said to keep certain types/race/culture/gender down. However, thats not inherently part of what i've revealed. You can still believe in improving peoples abilities and not putting up a glass ceiling WHILE accepting that the population and microcosms have NO REAL REASON that they must correspond.
so I call bullshit that board rooms represent the exact same proportion of the population. The old battle ground was, liberal = humans have no talents or unchangeable human nature vs conservative = humans are determined by the human nature that no one can overcome. I think its a childish debate to take either side.