• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

[NT] INTJs vs. INTPs

MerkW

New member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
534
When I first took and MBTI test, I scored as an INTJ. I then took several other MBTI tests, only to receive identical results. However, approximately 6 months later, I took one MBTI test on which I scored INTP. After that, I began to score INTP on many tests. Right now I am having quite a lot of trouble settling on whether I am INTP or INTJ, and to be quite honest, it has been irritating me quite a lot. Also, for the record, I believe that I am an Oldham Idiosyncratic, 5 sp/sx (wings are relatively balanced, but I am still pretty sure that I am w4).

I think the INTJ description might fit be better than INTP except for one thing. In comparing several INTP and INTJ descriptions, I have found that INTPs are perceived as more absent-minded and impractical. Can an INTJ be absent-minded and/or highly impractical? Wouldn't, technically speaking, a very strong Ni dominant be the most unaware of physical reality, taking the weak Se into consideration? I think the problem I am having is distinguishing between strong Ni-dominant/weak Te-auxiliary vs. balanced Ti-dominant/strong Ne auxiliary. What are your opinions?
 

Eicr

New member
Joined
Oct 26, 2007
Messages
18
MBTI Type
INTJ
well, im an INTJ (on every single online test ive taken as well as the actual instrument itself) and I can be very absent minded about things I don't deem of particular importance. As for impracticality, well, my chosen field of study is abstact maths (granted the EXTREMELY abstract maths like model theory and propositional logic are a bit tough for me, but thats because they ARE tough in general).

You have to keep in mind that the descriptions you read of types are sort of "best fit" kind of descriptions. No one is going to match the descriptions exactly. One description I read said INTJ's very often had very short hair, were thin and walked with their stomach out. Well, my hair is past my shoulders. I'm barrel-chested, and while Im a healthy weight now, in my early teens I was pretty pudgy, and I definately slouch.

Also bare in mind that often that a lot of the type descriptions read like vague astrology "assesements" http://www.skepdic.com/forer.html

In short, dont worry too much about a test telling you who you are, decide for yourself.
 

nightning

ish red no longer *sad*
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,741
MBTI Type
INfj
Absentmindedness can be found in NJs as well... In fact the child description of INJs relates to being absentminded...

http://www.personalitypage.com/INJ.html said:
They're often off in their own world, and have a dreamlike quality

It's important to make the distinction between general absentmindedness over being absentminded with things we deemed as less important as Eicr stated...
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
50,189
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
When I first took and MBTI test, I scored as an INTJ. I then took several other MBTI tests, only to receive identical results. However, approximately 6 months later, I took one MBTI test on which I scored INTP. After that, I began to score INTP on many tests. Right now I am having quite a lot of trouble settling on whether I am INTP or INTJ, and to be quite honest, it has been irritating me quite a lot. Also, for the record, I believe that I am an Oldham Idiosyncratic, 5 sp/sx (wings are relatively balanced, but I am still pretty sure that I am w4).

I think the INTJ description might fit be better than INTP except for one thing. In comparing several INTP and INTJ descriptions, I have found that INTPs are perceived as more absent-minded and impractical. Can an INTJ be absent-minded and/or highly impractical?

I would not get too hung up on this one thing. Motivations are generally more important than the quality expressed. Many types can be absent-minded or impractical, just for different reasons.

Note that types separated by a J/P factor really are much further away / different from each other than types separated by a T/F or S/N factor.

INTP = Ti + Ne + Si + Fe
INTJ = Ni + Te + Fi + Se

So no functions are the same in the Conscious Self. INTP and INTJ are very different in terms of what functions are used most easily. INTP is actually more similar to ISTP (Ti similarity) in how it thinks, and more similar to INFP (Ne similarity) in what it envisions in the outer world.

See my signature -- I am very clearly INTP, not INTJ, especially if you know me in real life you'd see that there is no WAY I am a J... but my Oldham and enneagram scores are very similar to yours. (I do not know what that means for you exactly.)
 

Aven

New member
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
66
MBTI Type
INTP
If it's bothering you this much chances are you are a J.

I had the same happen to me, my J is just close to my P percentage, but I didn't really care in the end, I feel more comfortable with the INTP description even though most Ps peg me for a J.
 
G

GirlAmerica

Guest
I relate to both very strongly...though most of the time it is in my emotional life I am far more of a P. That is, with people I choose to emote on. They can wreck me/blindside me/suprise the heck out of me/confuse me....all making me feel as if each moment is taken in without J and having to be completely processed in a completely different way than anything else in my life. Snap judgement, or clarity does not come instantly to me when emotions are involved. I have to sometimes sit on them for days.

Also...I do find myself very much the oblivious nutty professor walking around and around and around parking garages stuck up in my head wondering where the HELL my car is.......I have had to call my husband down to help me locate it.
GRRRRRRRR (more than once).
 

anii

homo-loving sonovagun
Joined
Jul 9, 2007
Messages
901
MBTI Type
infp
Enneagram
9
As in: Godzilla vs. Mothra?

INTPs would kick ass!
 

Luke

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2007
Messages
25
MBTI Type
INTX
If it's bothering you this much chances are you are a J.

I had the same happen to me, my J is just close to my P percentage, but I didn't really care in the end, I feel more comfortable with the INTP description even though most Ps peg me for a J.

It has certainly bugged me a lot, and I'm probably an INTP.

Basically I would decide on a type, then months later something would make me reconsider.

What I think is important to understand is that INTP is the Ti-dominant, and INTJ is the Ni-dominant. If you decide on one or the other, it should be based on your empathizing more strongly with one of these as the dominant trait, as well as Ne or Te as the supporting trait. More advanced analysis might include looking at the tertiary and inferior. (Si and Fe for INTP, Fi and Se for INTJ. So INTJ likes physical excitement a little more, thinks about loyalty more, INTP likes to express emotion a little more, thinks about being comfortable more.)

You can't just go around deciding based on whether you "feel" more J or more P based on profiles or tests or whatever. The test percentages don't mean you are really only 51% J or whatever -- it only means the test is having a harder time pegging you, even though you are one or the other. (I think my first test was 52% J. It was the humanmetrics.com test.)

I think my need to resolve issues on a logical plane, coupled with a tendency towards flashes of inexplicable insight, points towards INTP. Whether the generally held INTP stereotype is based on the same type as me, or not, I feign no hypothesis. ;)
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
50,189
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Good post, Luke.

This part was very helpful, I think:

More advanced analysis might include looking at the tertiary and inferior. (Si and Fe for INTP, Fi and Se for INTJ. So INTJ likes physical excitement a little more, thinks about loyalty more, INTP likes to express emotion a little more, thinks about being comfortable more.)

And thank you for clarifying about the percentages. With most of these either/or style MBTI tests, the percentages don't signify much at all. 100% says there's a strong J/P preference, ~50% says the preference is weak... and that is about all that can be said. (And the same for the other function pairs.) For some reason, though, people still put percentages in their profiles.
 

Luke

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2007
Messages
25
MBTI Type
INTX
With most of these either/or style MBTI tests, the percentages don't signify much at all. 100% says there's a strong J/P preference, ~50% says the preference is weak... and that is about all that can be said. (And the same for the other function pairs.) For some reason, though, people still put percentages in their profiles.

Right... The test answer gives you a set of four metrics that indicate type, but don't necessarily define it. The score of I N T P indicates a person of the type that prefers Ti Ne Si Fe, which is what we call a true INTP. But you don't know for sure until you've assessed those directly, which is a rather tricky and introspective process.

Basically the thing is we're measuring a surface phenomenon with these four letters, not directly measuring the reality that causes the phenomenon. So mistakes and goofs are inevitable. But it's very handy as a starting place, as it is right more often than not. Chances are at least some of the letters are correct for you. Once you've got a score to work from, you can successively check and double-check against the predicted order of trait-preference. Sometimes you even get lucky and get all the letters correct the first time! :shock:
 

MacGuffin

Permabanned
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
10,710
MBTI Type
xkcd
Enneagram
9w1
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
I would not get too hung up on this one thing. Motivations are generally more important than the quality expressed. Many types can be absent-minded or impractical, just for different reasons.

Note that types separated by a J/P factor really are much further away / different from each other than types separated by a T/F or S/N factor.

INTP = Ti + Ne + Si + Fe
INTJ = Ni + Te + Fi + Se

So no functions are the same in the Conscious Self. INTP and INTJ are very different in terms of what functions are used most easily. INTP is actually more similar to ISTP (Ti similarity) in how it thinks, and more similar to INFP (Ne similarity) in what it envisions in the outer world.

See my signature -- I am very clearly INTP, not INTJ, especially if you know me in real life you'd see that there is no WAY I am a J... but my Oldham and enneagram scores are very similar to yours. (I do not know what that means for you exactly.)

Excellent post. The J/P function really messes with people. The "INTX" is a myth.
 

The Ü™

Permabanned
Joined
May 26, 2007
Messages
11,910
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
Well, with functions considered, I assume the INTJ is more addicted to his fantasies (sexual, sadistic, or otherwise).

In case of IxTP, however, the ISTP analyzes concrete things, with suitable professions including everything from your average grease monkey to brilliant surgeon and/or computer hardware specialist.

The INTP analyzes abstract ideas, and thus ranges from your average geek to theoretical physicist.
 

hotmale

New member
Joined
Oct 12, 2007
Messages
232
MBTI Type
ESTJ
Excellent post. The J/P function really messes with people. The "INTX" is a myth.

Not really. I think some people are really borderline. I'm not certain if J/P functions are mutually exclusive. Some people seem to possess both of equal amounts.
 

Mycroft

The elder Holmes
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
1,068
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
so/sp
Excellent post. The J/P function really messes with people. The "INTX" is a myth.

Indeed.

I think that younger Js, college age or younger, will often come out as Ps when they take an MBTI test. Then you get into the real world and come to learn why the phrase "moving mountains" exists. That's when the schedule pads, calendars, watches timed to the minute to the train line you use most often, etc., start to become a necessity.

There's no doubt in my mind that, had I taken an MBTI test in college, I would have come out as an INTP.
 

MacGuffin

Permabanned
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
10,710
MBTI Type
xkcd
Enneagram
9w1
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Not really. I think some people are really borderline. I'm not certain if J/P functions are mutually exclusive. Some people seem to possess both of equal amounts.

You don't understand J/P either.
 

Mycroft

The elder Holmes
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
1,068
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
so/sp
You don't understand J/P either.

In fairness, as pointed out to me by PTGatsby, the newer MBTI does treat J and P as an independent function. (Essentially making MBTI the Big Four and pissing all over its Jungian heritage.)
 

Xander

Lex Parsimoniae
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
4,463
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
9w8
INTP.

If your that bothered by your definition then I'd place money on INTP. Most INTJs I know couldn't give a monkey's left nut what you labelled them as.
 

Luke

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2007
Messages
25
MBTI Type
INTX
Excellent post. The J/P function really messes with people. The "INTX" is a myth.

If you use X to mean "unknown" then it's a useful concept. So long as I'm not sure whether I'm Ti-dominant or Ni-dominant, I can't confidently describe myself as anything else. The other three letters are usually easier to narrow down. J/P has a special meaning for introverts that makes it easy to mess up on, so caution is merited.

The reason for the confusion is people tend to confuse their score (an indicator of type) with their true type (a hard and unchanging fact to be determined.) As in, they think "people who score INTJ" is somehow the definition of INTJ. In reality it's "People with dominant Ni, auxiliary Te, etc." that defines what an INTJ is. People who score INTJ are more likely to be Ni-dominant. But it's just a statistical indicator, and most of the time at least one letter is off.

Xander said:
INTP.

If your that bothered by your definition then I'd place money on INTP. Most INTJs I know couldn't give a monkey's left nut what you labelled them as.

To me at least, it's not a matter of labeling. It's about making a correct logical determination. Failure to do so is really irksome. So yeah, I'm probably INTP.

Schizm said:
me.

INTj or INTp?

Sergei Ganin is basically a brilliant nutjob -- I say that with the greatest affection and respect for his work. He explains Socionics very thoroughly, but made a mistake (or at least, a hugely controversial move) in translating the 4-letter system to the MBTI. Reinin (another socionics figure) made this same mistake earlier, and honestly it's a counter-intuitive issue to start with. Basically the "mistake" is using the J/P letter to represent "rationality" in a straightforward sense, rather than inverting it's meaning for introverts.

Picture someone translating a work from Russian and substituting P for R because that's what the cryllic equivalent looks like. It's "simpler" for the translator, but the target audience is going to totally mispronounce everything.

Instead of being INTP, I would be INTj in that system. An INTJ would likewise be called an INTp. There's a good theoretical reason for this, even though it's more cumbersome on a practical level. From an inward perspective an INTP is actually more uptight -- they want 100% logical answers to everything. Whereas from an outward, everyday perspective, they "let things slide" more easily, and are more "laid back", less critical -- all the stereotypical P traits. So you look at one and think "P" but after getting to know them close-up, you have some doubts because they're really kind of uptight. The same happens for INTJ. They only seem J-like on the surface, once you get to know them they have a side that is much more P-like.

One approach is to use a lowercase 4-letter to refer only to strict rationality. Then Fi-dominant and Ti-dominant types will be the lowercase-j's along with the Fe and Te dominant types. But the original meaning of uppercase J and P is not going to go away any time soon, so I really don't think this is the best idea as a general practice.
 

proteanmix

Plumage and Moult
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
5,514
Enneagram
1w2
Luke, you actually know what the hell you're talking about! :happy0065: :woot:
 
Top