[NT] Are INTs "haters"?

[foolish heart]

Hey you, did I forget to mention?
Lately you have drawn my attention.
But what I am hearing I don't quite get,
can't help but wonder if you're full of #@&!
Before you spill your opinions on me
think for a while, simple as ABC!


Are INTs "haters"? Discuss.

 

[Oaky]

EDIT: Looked back at my comment. Didn't like it.

I think more of XNTPs are haters.

 

[Night]

No. They're contrarians, until you provide a complete analytical picture.

 

[avolkiteshvara]

Yes.


I'm being contrary.

 

[Totenkindly]

I hate generalizations and questions based on them.
They're irrational and annoying, and not worth the energy to give detailed answers to.

 

[Jaguar]

Hey you, did I forget to mention?
Lately you have drawn my attention.
But what I am hearing I don't quite get,
can't help but wonder if you're full of #@&!
Before you spill your opinions on me
think for a while, simple as ABC!

 

[Spamtar]

Summer? Is that you? I said I parked your car down the street so you wouldn't drive drunk. Left from the taco stand...left.

And no, you door made that messed up cranking noise before.

 

[foolish heart]

I hate generalizations and questions based on them.
They're irrational and annoying, and not worth the energy to give detailed answers to.

There are no correlations between "INT" and being critical, spiteful, negative, "difficult", etc? Is that just me? I confess I am not knowledgeable in MBTI.

No. They're contrarians, until you provide a complete analytical picture.

Interesting explanation, I am curious to hear more... for instance, why the need for a completed analysis considering the thinking and communication style of "INT"?

 

[Night]

Interesting explanation, I am curious to hear more... for instance, why the need for a completed analysis considering the thinking and communication style of "INT"?

Because it hurts to allow inadequacy to flourish.

Tends to suck the intellectual energy out of future discussions when the preamble is built on sand.

 

[Spamtar]

Yes agree that little bit more foundation first for assumed facts helps...particularly when those facts are not generally accepted facts.

No biggie...live and learn.

 

[InfiniteIntrigue]

Only of NF's.
Just kidding.

 

[Gewitter27]

Depends of your use of said word is in a connotative or denotative way, in my opinion. I'd say that it is quite likely, either way, although prescise arguments and points are different for arguing each case.

 

[Quinlan]

No they're lovers.

 

[A Schnitzel]

LOL WUT

 

[Gewitter27]

Allow me to explain Quinlan's position to you A Schnitzel:

Activation.

 

[krunchtime]

What are haters? Because you think you've walked through the entire thinking process and arrived at the optimal conclusion, so everyone else must be wrong? But at the same time it makes you wrong for failing to consider the validity of other options? So in the process of trying to be logical, you find yourself becoming more and more illogical? If INTs are "haters", they hate both themselves and others, which makes them nihilists, which in turn makes them Zen.