I experience Ti + Ne for much to the same effects, perhaps with less number of levels (tho I'm not sure what you mean by levels). Te includes making things happen. If you drive the development a certain way, and you know how powerful you are in it, you can predict it to greater effect.. but with much less variation to differences. Any variations would have to be eliminated in order to secure the planned outcome. I am not sure if this is what you ment.
When I noticed being able to predict others actions, after some time I hated how obvious everyone was; later I noticed that it was because I was so general in expecting what they do. Like; "now they are starting with some nicety", yes they did, "they'll counter this argument by pointing out some practicalities", etc.
I think my Ti+Ne works different from your Te+Ni, my look-ahead window in T things includes about 2-3 levels, but with all the possibilities, including topics in the conversation, out of it, an emergency in the building, a jump in context, an argument over the style of situation, changing views from one or both participants, etc.. any such changes that are brought in the situation don't really surprise me at all and I find it trivial to adapt. Most often the person who BROUGHT the change in situation is less adaptive..
It's probably because they can't look ahead so much, adapt to new information, so they can jump to new different things but then they look their sight where they are.
So I think most people are limited to adopting 1 new point/change of view per conversation, then they're stuck. (edit: less than 1 actually. People dont adopt new points in conversation, on average. They notice that their old points dont work that time, that's it.)
My look-ahead with F is 2 levels and 1 level with S. When I clean my apartment or do something other physical, I find that I'm less effective in predicting what physical I will have to do next (after 1 step is done), and I consider myself 20-30% slower than the people in general.
Ne is another look-ahead function. I think Ne can see what can come from the ingredients we have at one time, but point out the process. Ne jumps over the things that are to be expected. It's like that predicting that some situation will pressure 2 people to get along; so I'll know the 2 will get along, but being unable to tell how. I could predict that one or the other invites the other to their favourite hobby or pastime, but I couldn't tell what it is without asking. S I think has a different approach, I think they would start by asking the hobby/pastime because of their idea that it's usually good thing to do, and they would follow the path they see and end up in the result I predicted.