• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

[NT] How are INTP and INTJ different

INTP

Active member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
7,803
MBTI Type
intp
Enneagram
5w4
Instinctual Variant
sx
Ah, classic. One of the puzzling things about TPs...if you want respect/understanding with regard to who you are does it really seem like a good idea to use other people's emotions/concerns etc. for kicks or entertainment? You may very well believe this is the way you figure people out (and I can see how this works partly), by poking them, but in fact you obscure large parts of what it is to be an INTJ to yourself because you're eroding trust...if your goal is true understanding, this doesn't make sense. Or it doesn't make sense to only do that without also providing ways in which the INTJ will feel safe to open up to you.

sorry i didnt know that this living in your own world thing is such a big concern for you and that making fun about it makes you emotional :D. and no this isnt my way of trying to figure out people. im used to INTJ who can take this and is doing the same thing to me and we both are able to see it as lighthearted fun, maybe it was wrong to assume that all INTJs are the same. maybe because my goal with this isnt to understand, it doesent make sense if you look at it from that point of view. usually when something doesent make sense, you need to look at it from different angle. this is exactly what i was talking about when saying that INTJs living in their own world, thanks for giving a good example about this. the fact was that i think its fun to mess with INTJs, you conclusion was that im trying to understand INTJs, getting them to open up to me etc etc. it was true in your world before you read this, and it was based on some single fact that you used as the basis for this world of yours, even tho in reality, that fact was totally unrelated to any conclusions you draw from it.
 

Xyk

New member
Joined
Mar 27, 2011
Messages
284
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5
Well now, this is lookin' like an old fashioned PJ shootout. :offtobed:
 

Bobble

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
116
MBTI Type
xxxx
Enneagram
?
if you read my posts and you wanted to laugh AT me you're an INTP

If you read my posts and you wanted to not laugh you're an INTJ
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
A side note.

Intelligence is not N or S intelligence.
It is not P or J intelligence.

It is only intelligence.
 

InvisibleJim

Permabanned
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
2,387
Are INTJ's more likely to make decisions based on feeling (3rd function) as opposed to INTP's (4th function)?

:peepwall:

Not neccessarily, but INTJs are more likely to make ethical decisions based upon their moral compass (Fi-relief) and reject social compromise in their own ethics and also to ignore social compromise others are making (Fe-PoLR) whereas INTPs are inclined to find/gravitate towards people in life who meet an acceptable social compromise ethical standard (Fe anima) often displaying these traits themselves over short bursts of time under stress.

If you mean feeling by 'ENFP' 'feelingz iz empathyz' then neither. I'm afraid neither do you.
 

INTPness

New member
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
2,157
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w4
Generally, we both manage to run our Fi/Si inputs through our respective N-T circuits before acting, though, so they influence our decisions, but don't dictate them.

This. "N" and "T" are our primary and secondary functions. F has input, but only if it checks out OK with T. It's like asking your supervisor (T) if you can have the day off. If he says no, you go back to your office and keep working like an obedient puppy. If he says yes, then you're free to do your thing.

if you read my posts and you wanted to laugh AT me you're an INTP

If you read my posts and you wanted to not laugh you're an INTJ

I guess I should change my name to INTJness. :D
 
A

Anew Leaf

Guest
if you read my posts and you wanted to laugh AT me you're an INTP

If you read my posts and you wanted to not laugh you're an INTJ

Well this solves my mbti type mystery! What a short and sweet test you provide.
 

InvisibleJim

Permabanned
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
2,387
wrong usage of terms annoys INTPs, but apparently INTJs like to do that

There was nothing wrong with the use of terms. Go read some Jung instead of complaining that MBTI isn't Jung and Socionics isn't Jung when yet again you have proven you don't even understand the principles of the inferior function as Jung defined it. I've told you before: I'm not your mother.
 

INTPness

New member
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
2,157
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w4
wrong usage of terms annoys INTPs, but apparently INTJs like to do that

There was nothing wrong with the use of terms. Go read some Jung instead of complaining that MBTI isn't Jung and Socionics isn't Jung when yet again you have proven you don't even understand the principles of the inferior function as Jung defined it. I've told you before: I'm not your mother.

:bitchfest:
 

INTP

Active member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
7,803
MBTI Type
intp
Enneagram
5w4
Instinctual Variant
sx
There was nothing wrong with the use of terms. Go read some Jung instead of complaining that MBTI isn't Jung and Socionics isn't Jung when yet again you have proven you don't even understand the principles of the inferior function as Jung defined it. I've told you before: I'm not your mother.

anima has nothing to do with psychological typology, you go read some jung instead of erics posts about some bullshit "archetypes" of functions..




http://www.nyaap.org/jung-lexicon/a/#anima said:
Anima
The inner feminine side of a man. (See also animus, Eros, Logos and soul-image.)


The anima is both a personal complex and an archetypal image of woman in the male psyche. It is an unconscious factor incarnated anew in every male child, and is responsible for the mechanism of projection. Initially identified with the personal mother, the anima is later experienced not only in other women but as a pervasive influence in a man’s life.

"The anima is the archetype of life itself.["Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious," CW 9i, par. 66.]"

"There is [in man] an imago not only of the mother but of the daughter, the sister, the beloved, the heavenly goddess, and the chthonic Baubo. Every mother and every beloved is forced to become the carrier and embodiment of this omnipresent and ageless image, which corresponds to the deepest reality in a man. It belongs to him, this perilous image of Woman; she stands for the loyalty which in the interests of life he must sometimes forego; she is the much needed compensation for the risks, struggles, sacrifices that all end in disappointment; she is the solace for all the bitterness of life. And, at the same time, she is the great illusionist, the seductress, who draws him into life with her Maya-and not only into life’s reasonable and useful aspects, but into its frightful paradoxes and ambivalences where good and evil, success and ruin, hope and despair, counterbalance one another. Because she is his greatest danger she demands from a man his greatest, and if he has it in him she will receive it.["The Syzygy: Anima and Animus," CW 9ii, par. 24]"

The anima is personified in dreams by images of women ranging from seductress to spiritual guide. It is associated with the eros principle, hence a man’s anima development is reflected in how he relates to women. Within his own psyche, the anima functions as his soul, influencing his ideas, attitudes and emotions.

"The anima is not the soul in the dogmatic sense, not an anima rationalis, which is a philosophical conception, but a natural archetype that satisfactorily sums up all the statements of the unconscious, of the primitive mind, of the history of language and religion. . . . It is always the a priori element in [a man's] moods, reactions, impulses, and whatever else is spontaneous in psychic life.["Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious," CW 9i, par. 57.]"

"The anima . . . . intensifies, exaggerates, falsifies, and mythologizes all emotional relations with his work and with other people of both sexes. The resultant fantasies and entanglements are all her doing. When the anima is strongly constellated, she softens the man’s character and makes him touchy, irritable, moody, jealous, vain, and unadjusted.["Concerning the Archetypes and the Anima Concept,"[ ibid., par. 144.]" As an inner personality, the anima is complementary to the persona and stands in a compensatory relationship to it.

"The persona, the ideal picture of a man as he should be, is inwardly compensated by feminine weakness, and as the individual outwardly plays the strong man, so he becomes inwardly a woman, i.e., the anima, for it is the anima that reacts to the persona. But because the inner world is dark and invisible . . . and because a man is all the less capable of conceiving his weaknesses the more he is identified with the persona, the persona’s counterpart, the anima, remains completely in the dark and is at once projected, so that our hero comes under the heel of his wife’s slipper.["Anima and Animus," CW 7, par. 309.]"

Hence the character of the anima can generally be deduced from that of the persona; all those qualities absent from the outer attitude will be found in the inner.

"The tyrant tormented by bad dreams, gloomy forebodings, and inner fears is a typical figure. Outwardly ruthless, harsh, and unapproachable, he jumps inwardly at every shadow, is at the mercy of every mood, as though he were the feeblest and most impressionable of men. Thus his anima contains all those fallible human qualities his persona lacks. If the persona is intellectual, the anima will certainly be sentimental.["Definitions," CW 6, par. 804.]"

Similarly, where a man identifies with the persona, he is in effect possessed by the anima, with attendant symptoms.

"Identity with the persona automatically leads to an unconscious identity with the anima because, when the ego is not differentiated from the persona, it can have no conscious relation to the unconscious processes. Consequently it is these processes, it is identical with them. Anyone who is himself his outward role will infallibly succumb to the inner processes; he will either frustrate his outward role by absolute inner necessity or else reduce it to absurdity, by a process of enantiodromia. He can no longer keep to his individual way, and his life runs into one deadlock after another. Moreover, the anima is inevitably projected upon a real object, with which he gets into a relation of almost total dependence.[Ibid., par. 807.]"

"Jung distinguished four broad stages of the anima, analogous to levels of the Eros cult described in the late classical period. He personified them as Eve, Helen, Mary and Sophia.["The Psychology of the Transference," CW 16, par. 361. ]"

In the first stage, Eve, the anima is indistinguishable from the personal mother. The man cannot function well without a close tie to a woman. In the second stage, personified in the historical figure of Helen of Troy, the anima is a collective and ideal sexual image ("All is dross that is not Helen"-Marlowe). The third stage, Mary, manifests in religious feelings and a capacity for lasting relationships. In the fourth stage, as Sophia (called Wisdom in the Bible), a man’s anima functions as a guide to the inner life, mediating to consciousness the contents of the unconscious. She cooperates in the search for meaning and is the creative muse in an artist’s life.

Ideally, a man’s anima proceeds naturally through these stages as he grows older. In fact, as an archetypal life force, the anima manifests in whatever shape or form is necessary to compensate the dominant conscious attitude.

So long as the anima is unconscious, everything she stands for is projected. Most commonly, because of the initially close tie between the anima and the protective mother-imago, this projection falls on the partner, with predictable results.

"[A man's] ideal of marriage is so arranged that his wife has to take over the magical role of the mother. Under the cloak of the ideally exclusive marriage he is really seeking his mother’s protection, and thus he plays into the hands of his wife’s possessive instincts. His fear of the dark incalculable power of the unconscious gives his wife an illegitimate authority over him, and forges such a dangerously close union that the marriage is permanently on the brink of explosion from internal tension.["Anima and Animus," CW 7, par. 316.]"

No matter where a man is in terms of psychological development, he is always prone to see aspects of his anima, his soul, in an actual woman. The same is true of the animus. Their personal aspects may be integrated and their significance understood, but their essential nature cannot be exhausted.

"Though the effects of anima and animus can be made conscious, they themselves are factors transcending consciousness and beyond the reach of perception and volition. Hence they remain autonomous despite the integration of their contents, and for this reason they should be borne constantly in mind.["The Syzygy: Anima and Animus," CW 9ii, par. 40.]"

The psychological priority in the first half of life is for a man to free himself from the anima fascination of the mother. In later life, the lack of a conscious relationship with the anima is attended by symptoms characteristic of "loss of soul."

"Younger people . . . can bear even the total loss of the anima without injury. The important thing at this stage is for a man to be a man. . . . After the middle of life, however, permanent loss of the anima means a diminution of vitality, of flexibility, and of human kindness. The result, as a rule, is premature rigidity, crustiness, stereotypy, fanatical one-sidedness, obstinacy, pedantry, or else resignation, weariness, sloppiness, irresponsibility, and finally a childish ramollissement [petulance] with a tendency to alcohol.["Concerning the Archetypes and the Anima Concept,"CW 9i, par. 146f.]"

One way for a man to become familiar with the nature of his anima is through the method of active imagination. This is done by personifying her as an autonomous personality, asking her questions and attending to the response.

"I mean this as an actual technique. . . . The art of it consists only in allowing our invisible partner to make herself heard, in putting the mechanism of expression momentarily at her disposal, without being overcome by the distaste one naturally feels at playing such an apparently ludicrous game with oneself, or by doubts as to the genuineness of the voice of one’s interlocutor.["Anima and Animus," CW 7, pars. 323f.] Jung suggested that if the encounter with the shadow is the "apprentice-piece"in a man’s development, then coming to terms with the anima is the "master-piece."["Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious,"CW 9i, par. 61.]" The goal is her transformation from a troublesome adversary into a function of relationship between consciousness and the unconscious. Jung called this "the conquest of the anima as an autonomous complex."

"With the attainment of this goal it becomes possible to disengage the ego from all its entanglements with collectivity and the collective unconscious. Through this process the anima forfeits the daemonic power of an autonomous complex; she can no longer exercise the power of possession, since she is depotentiated. She is no longer the guardian of treasures unknown; no longer Kundry, daemonic Messenger of the Grail, half divine and half animal; no longer is the soul to be called "Mistress,"but a psychological function of an intuitive nature, akin to what the primitives mean when they say, "He has gone into the forest to talk with the spirits"or "My snake spoke with me" or, in the mythological language of infancy, "A little bird told me."["The Mana-Personality," CW 7, par. 374.]"

+ im lucky your not my mother, but its good that you keep reminding me about it for some weird reason that i havent figured out yet..

and you havent proven that you know anything about jungian psychology, only thing that you have proven is that you think you know, when infact you are just talking bullshit
 

skylights

i love
Joined
Jul 6, 2010
Messages
7,756
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
6w7
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
counterpoint: how are INTP and INTJ the same?

answer: they can get into endless argument ;)
 

InvisibleJim

Permabanned
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
2,387
blah blah blah, quotes which disprove nothing

We can all copy and paste lots of extraneous material and declare it proves a point when neither proves nor disproves the anima and it's position in the id.

However what if we were all smart enough to read psychological types and to read where Jung states that the anima is opposite the dominant/ego archetype?

Diddums.
 

King sns

New member
Joined
Nov 4, 2008
Messages
6,714
MBTI Type
enfp
Enneagram
6w7
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
The differences I've observed is that the INTP can talk off into a lot of tangents, one leading into the other. I see them as lovable professors. (Though the ones that I know had a wide variety of chosen professions, from the lazy slacker variety to the "decent" respectable variety. I'm thinking of IT guys, guys in "Office Space" situations, guys who work at Best Buy, but not just limited to, of course.) Very unassuming. Questions things, nothings right or wrong. Seem unmotivated/ lazy at times. INTJ's (small sample size that I think I know) are more decisive, one track, there are right things and wrong things. More driven and motivated. Less open to strange possibilities/ more open to patterns/correctness. They seem to have professions requiring a lot of orientation to both detail and patterns. (Engineering comes to mind, I'm also thinking of a couple of MD's.)

Both have very good sense of humor, INTP being more ironic/ silly. / INTJ being more sarcastic/ dry. (Both brands of humor that I appreciate.)

(My own view of the differences/ and my own typing of the people in question- so can't be sure- also, I left out people from type c.)
 

INTP

Active member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
7,803
MBTI Type
intp
Enneagram
5w4
Instinctual Variant
sx
counterpoint: how are INTP and INTJ the same?

answer: they can get into endless argument ;)

with each others ;)

one big reason why i like NFPs is that this doesent happen with them :)

We can all copy and paste lots of extraneous material and declare it proves a point when neither proves nor disproves the anima and it's position in the id.

However what if we were all smart enough to read psychological types and to read where Jung states that the anima is opposite the dominant/ego archetype?

Diddums.

oh, so now you are mixing freudian psychology with jungian :doh:

if by dominant, you mean first function, functions positions arent archetypes, function positions are simply function positions. neither is ego an archetype, its the central complex in the field of consciousness. you are combining unrelated shit again and getting your own conclusions.

the idea that archetypes are related to typology comes from beebe, not jung
 
A

Anew Leaf

Guest
Another difference:

INTJ: will argue a point until they decide that they have expended the allotted energy stores on the situation and then move on.
INTP: will argue a point until the 4 horsemen arrive.

;)
 

Santosha

New member
Joined
Feb 1, 2011
Messages
1,516
MBTI Type
HUMR
Enneagram
6
Instinctual Variant
sx
Not neccessarily, but INTJs are more likely to make ethical decisions based upon their moral compass (Fi-relief) and reject social compromise in their own ethics and also to ignore social compromise others are making (Fe-PoLR) whereas INTPs are inclined to find/gravitate towards people in life who meet an acceptable social compromise ethical standard (Fe anima) often displaying these traits themselves over short bursts of time under stress.

If you mean feeling by 'ENFP' 'feelingz iz empathyz' then neither. I'm afraid neither do you.

Can you clarify that last sentence? Are you saying ENFP does not experience feeling as empathy, or specifically *me*? You know I was joking when I said I sell INTJ tears on Ebay :whistling:
 
Top