Well I am sorry, didnt wanted to insult your intelligence. I just dont click with you. You may have read a lot of books but your thoughts on the matter still aint equal to mine.
I’ve not seen any thoughts on the subject from you but why did you post the link to the test if you didn’t want to talk about it
I have come to learn the mbti system, after I got to learn people. That means to me the mbti system is no accurate description of people, but it gives me a vocabulary to phrase some things I witnessed too. And this forum, with having a lot of people speaking the same language, it is even more easier to talk about then what moves you the most.
I agree, but I’ve also studied a fair few other systems prior to MBTI and my job invents these types of systems for various marketing
You cant impress me with ur knowledge of mbti books in that regards, because in the end its about people and not the system itself. Regarding the system tho, it is true that the four functions play a key role in it. There are several interpretations from now on, like shadow functions or function pairs making up for the ideal mate, I dont care about them too much, it does overcomplicate the whole thing too much.
I’m not trying to impress you, simply pointing out after your previous slight that I do know a fair bit about the subject although not professionally qualified. So we are both agreed that some of the details of the functional analysis does over complicate things.
But what I dont think and tho LL is a nice guy, I dont think its made out of 2 functions only. I am rather on the side with socionics here and think every person got all 8 of them, but its really not that important to me.
I don’t think he said there was two function, he said there would be two that were more dominant (which I agree with). The rest have varying degrees of input but are so dominated by the first two they add nuance rather than derive the character...
To me, as I told you, mbti is a vocabulary to talk about things that have mattered to me in the past. I wasnt able to phrase some things until I discovered this site. It helped me a lot in my personal development, cause now I am able to talk better about things and I am better at pinpointing out what bugs me in a situation.
I dont really click with you and I want to end this convo at this point. I nevertheless thank you tho very much for your attempt at trieing to help me. I posted the mypersonality link cause you asked for it. I did a lot of other different tests to I can link to you.
I’m sorry but you seem upset about something, having been very friendly for a good few days, so thats OK, but it is strange. Not a problem to me
It doesnt really matter to me to know exactly what my 4 type letters are in the end, cause as I told you, I dont think it works. MBTI is a nice tool to learn about differences in life, but if you start assessing human beings, what its all about, in that kind of logical way to exactly pinpoint down if someone is more of a T or a F it becomes to narrow-minded, cause people aint machines.
And in the end, what does it give me if I'ld know I am enfp or estj, it wouldn't change the person I am and if I would make my personality dependant on my mbti results, I better go see a professional doctor.
Of course not, but this wasn’t driven by me....
If you feel offended tho that I inherit the same type as you on this forum and you want the crown for yourself only, let me know, I am gonna remove my type code then, it wouldnt matter to me.
Of course not, I’m just a bit perturbed by your behaviour in the last two post but hey not my problem....