I did not "attack" you, I don't even know you, so why should I?
I just told you what I thought, but the response you made was out of proportion, so I suggested you to relax, to calm down.
1) You stubbornly refused to consider the tiny possibility you may be wrong, that something in your own reasoning may be flawed.I'm not following your attacks on me, at what point did I use a "ego defense mechanism" and state that INTPs are the best blah blah blah, etc?
2) You considered this tiny possibility as a personal attack.
3) You refused to discuss it.
4) And while it's true you did not state that "INTPs are the best... blah blah blah", it was Tallulah's primary reaction.
Your retaliations and aggressivity are disproportionate.
Again, here is my point. Somebody asks you if you like dogs. Saying just "No", is a blunt negative statement, and should be interpreted as such.
Again, you used another flawed example:
"Could me saying "I don't dislike dogs" mean the same as I love dogs?"
Are you aware you were using the classic form of a Litotes? Do you know what this is? So here, the answer is YES: "I don't dislike dogs"="I love dogs".
That's a figure of speech, that's verbal nuances, that's everyday life conversations.
You're free to invent your own language, your own definitions, to justify (even "logically") your own sense of subjectivity. But don't complain if later, you're not very well understood.