You are reducing women to mere objects that are there for you to seduce. Maybe you should ask yourself what would happen if you stopped thinking of women as "targets" but as unique human beings, with different personalities, talents, vulnerabilities, hopes, dreams for the future, who are loved and cherished by their families. If you are incapable of seeing the multidimensionality and uniqueness of each and every woman that you interact with, and feeling compassion for them, you've got big problems. What are your feelings about all of the women you have slept with? I bet you don't have any.
The mere fact that I do not elaborate on all the wonderful things that make women special creations (or for that fact humans) does not mean I am discounting these aspects. PLEASE ATTEMPT TO MAKE THIS DISTINGUISHMENT. As an analogy, it is as if having to address long winded discussions on religion and creationism for every discussion on evolution, it obfuscate. I would just rather stipulate that I am a sonova bitch to focus on what is logically material with the issue at hand.
I should not even have to raise the point that my
feelings for women I have slept with is positive. I find it narcissistic to have to inject how I
feel in my "conquests" when my clear intent is simply to advise OP from how to get to point A to point B to point C. ("
target" is clear [the focus of your seduction tactic] "the woman", "your love interest", "attractive member of opposite sex" is not clear; no value judgment via oobjectification, strictly for clarity.)
The fact I am attempting to break down and clarify a complex dynamic without elaborating into abstractions (or poetry) does not mean the abstractions are irrelevant. Addressing my motivations and world view has little to do with the system I am proposing.
In other words, if there is something that doesn't work or is not logical as to my proposed systems, please highlight it and give logical rationale to your point, not simply mudsling (I am not addressing you specifically I rather discourse in general).
As to morality, ethics and motivations it is less of my concern to elaborate. In fact, it has a tendency to obfuscate because it is a fall back of those who detract from my suggestion to the OP and fail to be able to give a workable alternative besides vague, pithy or worthless suggestions (“be yourself”, drink alcohol, hire prostitutes). If anything my detractors seem to be even overestimating the pragmatic effectiveness of my system (as if my targets would lose all will power to my comands).
Where are those people's concerns about helping a fellow TC member with a bona fide question seeking a solution? All it does is illustrating that my solution is a logical solution and those detractors, unable to see fault in the logic choose to attack my character or demonize a concept that they can only view through a vague/ prejudicial / uninformed mindset. In other words the OP proposed a problem; I offered a solution to the problem. The question was how an INTP can seduce, INTP thrive with logical systems, thus logical systems were offered. It wasn't how to keep them for a LTR, it wasn't how to find their soul mate, and it wasn't about love or self actualization. It was a clear problem with a clear solution from me and no other. I see a question and if it interests me my goal is to find a logical answer.
