I often tend to incorperate many underlying thoughts in a single arguement, wielding the Sword of Sarcasm in one hand and the Shield of Truth in the other.
This often results in arguements that are fairly hard to understand to most people.
Also as it is not always essential for me that others need to understand me. I often don't explain these meanings in detail.
However, to any person I respect and enjoy talking to, I will be as clear as possible, often through great lengths, which can then in turn be interpretted as annoying and forceful, even though that is never the intention.
Ultimatly, we don't really care, as long as we are happy with ourselves.
how can you tell the difference between ENTPs and INTPs in the style that they debate?
I enjoy debating with ENTPs but not with INTPs and I can't put my finger on why.
i really dislike arguing with INFPs and INTPs, i reckon it's because of their S. they often seem like clinging to a certain principle either out of spite or for no real reason other than what may be interpreted as experience. they are stuck in the same perspective and unable to justify another view on things.
i hunt INXPs for bounty
FUNCTION ORDER FOR THOSE THAT CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHAT ENXP MEANS: Ne > Ni > Fi=Ti > *