User Tag List

First 41495051

Results 501 to 505 of 505

Thread: NTs and God

  1. #501
    The elder Holmes Mycroft's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    5w6 so/sp
    Posts
    1,080

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Liquid_Laser View Post
    I can't believe that you are making a distinction on this minor level of abstraction, and yet at the same time think that numbers are real entities. If you consider measurement abstract, then numbers are much much more abstract, lol.
    The number "1" is a representation of real world object; what the object is is irrelevant. This is important: it doesn't matter what the object is. No matter what the object is, in this universe adding one object to another object results in two objects. In this way, quibbles over the nature of any given object are sidestepped to tell us something real about the universe: that adding one object to another object results in two objects.

    Accordingly, as this yields real information about our universe, I would say it is anything but abstract.
    Dost thou love Life? Then do not squander Time; for that's the Stuff Life is made of.

    -- Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack, June 1746 --

  2. #502
    Glowy Goopy Goodness The_Liquid_Laser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    MBTI
    ENTP
    Posts
    3,377

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mycroft View Post
    The number "1" is a representation of real world object; what the object is is irrelevant. This is important: it doesn't matter what the object is. No matter what the object is, in this universe adding one object to another object results in two objects. In this way, quibbles over the nature of any given object are sidestepped to tell us something real about the universe: that adding one object to another object results in two objects.

    Accordingly, as this yields real information about our universe, I would say it is anything but abstract.
    1 can also represent units of measurement. "1 meter" is not an object. It's a description of a unit of length. On the other hand "1 meter" does measure something concrete. When you have a label, whether it be "1 meter" or "1 orange" or "1 dollar", you are describing something concrete. When you remove the label and just have "1", you have an abstraction. You have taken an adjective and made it a noun. You are calling "1" a thing when such a thing doesn't really exist as an object in reality. It only exists as an adjective. That is why numbers by themselves are abstract.

    Now let's going back to our example about measuring hours. A clock measures hours in a cycle of twelve. It does this because days progress in a repeated cycle. The repeated cycle of 12 (or 24) hours represents reality, because the days themselves are cyclical. In reality 10 + 5 = 3 when talking about hours because time happens in a cycle. The cycle is reality.
    My wife and I made a game to teach kids about nutrition. Please try our game and vote for us to win. (Voting period: July 14 - August 14)
    http://www.revoltingvegetables.com

  3. #503
    The elder Holmes Mycroft's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    5w6 so/sp
    Posts
    1,080

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Liquid_Laser View Post
    1 can also represent units of measurement. "1 meter" is not an object. It's a description of a unit of length. On the other hand "1 meter" does measure something concrete. When you have a label, whether it be "1 meter" or "1 orange" or "1 dollar", you are describing something concrete. When you remove the label and just have "1", you have an abstraction. You have taken an adjective and made it a noun. You are calling "1" a thing when such a thing doesn't really exist as an object in reality. It only exists as an adjective. That is why numbers by themselves are abstract.

    Now let's going back to our example about measuring hours. A clock measures hours in a cycle of twelve. It does this because days progress in a repeated cycle. The repeated cycle of 12 (or 24) hours represents reality, because the days themselves are cyclical. In reality 10 + 5 = 3 when talking about hours because time happens in a cycle. The cycle is reality.
    A "meter" does not exist. All that exists is a length. An "hour" does not exist. All that exists is time. Numbers can certainly be used to represent even such man-made objects as units of measurement; as I stated, numbers represent objects. However, man-made objects like units of measurement have no existence in and of themselves and, consequently, tell us nothing about the universe.

    However, this does bring into sharp relief an important point: numbers, as representations of objects, are not units of measurements themselves.
    Dost thou love Life? Then do not squander Time; for that's the Stuff Life is made of.

    -- Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack, June 1746 --

  4. #504
    Glowy Goopy Goodness The_Liquid_Laser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    MBTI
    ENTP
    Posts
    3,377

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mycroft View Post
    A "meter" does not exist. All that exists is a length. An "hour" does not exist. All that exists is time. Numbers can certainly be used to represent even such man-made objects as units of measurement; as I stated, numbers represent objects. However, man-made objects like units of measurement have no existence in and of themselves and, consequently, tell us nothing about the universe.

    However, this does bring into sharp relief an important point: numbers, as representations of objects, are not units of measurements themselves.
    We are both just saying the same thing over and over lol.
    My wife and I made a game to teach kids about nutrition. Please try our game and vote for us to win. (Voting period: July 14 - August 14)
    http://www.revoltingvegetables.com

  5. #505
    The elder Holmes Mycroft's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    5w6 so/sp
    Posts
    1,080

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Liquid_Laser View Post
    We are both just saying the same thing over and over lol.
    For once we are in agreement.

    Although, yes, you are correct in that numbers can be used to represent man-made objects in addition to metaphysical objects and I update my definition accordingly.
    Dost thou love Life? Then do not squander Time; for that's the Stuff Life is made of.

    -- Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack, June 1746 --

Similar Threads

  1. [NT] NTs and time
    By Natrushka in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 01-25-2010, 02:56 PM
  2. [NT] NTs and controlling thoughts
    By Varelse in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-08-2007, 02:10 PM
  3. [NT] Berens' comments on NTs and conflict
    By rivercrow in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 07-13-2007, 05:05 PM
  4. [NT] NTs and Concentration
    By Varelse in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-23-2007, 01:17 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO