I work harder than some Ni-dom to create a structured sense of reality because my Ti is rather strong. I have spent a couple of decades living and working with Ti-doms, and especially because of empathy, this has influenced me a great deal. I feel a great deal of tension and frustration with language which is at odds with my INTP partner who has a high level of giftedness with language and relies on it to construct complex logical structures of ideas. When we resolve conflicts he sometimes analyzes our comparative semantic spaces, which I am infinitely charmed and fascinated by, and so it seems to work. It is interesting that many INFJ descriptions also talk about their use of metaphor, along with this description of rejecting the symbolic. I'll have to think about that for a while. I do reject archetypes, and there is a difference with my INFP sister who creates symbols and projections based on powerful experience (Fi-Si). I feel I often begin with a blank slate in many instances moreso than some people.
Edit: What could distinguish this transcending of language of both Fi and Ni could be the nature of what is inexplicable. Would Fi have an inexplicable sense of deep perception of the intensely personal, while Ni has an inexplicable sense of the nature of reality, a glimpse into eternity, a glimpse outside of self to the boundless and cohesiveness of reality?