• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

[MBTI General] I'm gonna piss a lot of people off with this thread

Kullervo

Permabanned
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
3,298
MBTI Type
N/A
:smile:
Socialism = Te

Or Fe (but for different reasons).

Te tends to categorise and classify, looking for evidence in the world. Fe does the same but on a personal level, it sees people as part of a greater whole. Most collectivist ideologies are strong in Fe, Te (or both). Individualist ideologies, by contrast, are strong in Fi or Ti. Fi rejects both Fe and Te as too inconsiderate of individual identity and differences (notice the INFP - INFJ differences in opinion). We currently live in a very Fi dominant society, at the expense of other values. Ti believes Fe generalises too much and dislikes Te empiricism.

Hey, I'm a 23 something bearkin LBQT Afroasian transgender special snowflake looking to understand my own weirdness LOL XD :smile: <--- FiiiiiIIIIIII

Hey, it seems like it's trendy to be a 23 something bearkin LBQT Afroasian transgender special snowflake so I'm going to be one even though I'm a platinum blonde sucking daddy off to get my gender studies degree. Though I know I'll end up being a trophy bride to some guy ten years my senior, I'll abandon my values and love becoming his birth machine. Racism is disgusting. <--- Fe.
 

grey_beard

The Typing Tabby
Joined
Jan 28, 2014
Messages
1,478
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
5w4
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
:smile:

Or Fe (but for different reasons).

Te tends to categorise and classify, looking for evidence in the world. Fe does the same but on a personal level, it sees people as part of a greater whole. Most collectivist ideologies are strong in Fe, Te (or both). Individualist ideologies, by contrast, are strong in Fi or Ti. Fi rejects both Fe and Te as too inconsiderate of individual identity and differences (notice the INFP - INFJ differences in opinion). We currently live in a very Fi dominant society, at the expense of other values. Ti believes Fe generalises too much and dislikes Te empiricism.

Hey, I'm a 23 something bearkin LBQT Afroasian transgender special snowflake looking to understand my own weirdness LOL XD :smile: <--- FiiiiiIIIIIII

Hey, it seems like it's trendy to be a 23 something bearkin LBQT Afroasian transgender special snowflake so I'm going to be one even though I'm a platinum blonde sucking daddy off to get my gender studies degree. Though I know I'll end up being a trophy bride to some guy ten years my senior, I'll abandon my values and love becoming his birth machine. Racism is disgusting. <--- Fe.


Because FEELZ.

Try this one on for size:


And, as usual, Dilbert:

Dilbert Comic Strip on 1997-05-24 | Dilbert by Scott Adams
 

anticlimatic

Permabanned
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
3,299
MBTI Type
INTP
We currently live in a very Fi dominant society, at the expense of other values.

With you on that one.

I agree that Fe is collectivist, but not in the manner that bureaucratic administration is. Fe seems to me to aim for a universal feeling, but doesn't really go for constructing the external rules and logistics of it. I put those more in the realm of thought (Te). Since Fi and Te are bound together, if we're a heavy Fi society we're also a heavy Te society. Wasn't always so. I find it extremely unfortunate. The reason I think you see a lot of Fe dom/aux types on the socialism bandwagon is because it's currently the majority, and Fe dom/auxes are auto chameleons.
 

Litsnob

New member
Joined
Jan 22, 2016
Messages
301
INFJ Canadian weighing in here. It's the Canadian part that makes me a special snowflake in this thread. I am left of centre, here in Canada land though not all the way left. To an American I will look like a socialist though. I believe in capitalism but am willing to pay higher taxes for social programmes I see as valuable. Social programmes are not socialism and it is bonkers to think of actually doing away with capitalism. I suspect there is no perfect system and there is no system that will make all people happy.
 

hipsterpeterpan

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2016
Messages
29
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
I'm an INFP, and I've gotta say I'm more inclined to dislike capitalism because of the way it seems to place money/the final product at a higher value than individual people, which is at conflict with my ideals. But I don't know enough about socialism (or other systems) to determine if that would be any better.
 

geedoenfj

The more you know..
Joined
Oct 6, 2015
Messages
3,347
MBTI Type
ENFJ
Enneagram
6w7
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
I'm a NFJ and I don't assume that everyone should get the same amount of money, but I believe whoever has the ability to invest in him/her self or in some properties owes it to the society to work as much as he/she can to pay the taxes, and whoever has the most amount of money owes it to the society to pay taxes and do charity to create better opportunities for those less fortunate who are trying to work out their way in life..
 

Tilt

Active member
Joined
Sep 18, 2015
Messages
2,584
MBTI Type
ENFJ
Enneagram
3w4
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
I am an ENFJ and I am a fairly strong capitalist. I don't believe in the extravagant raises executives give themselves but I also don't believe in taxing the hell out of people who worked hard to accumulate wealth.
 

Pionart

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
4,024
MBTI Type
NiFe
I'm drunk, so naturally when I read "I'm going to piss a lot of..." I finished the sentence in the completely wrong way
 

meowington

Parody Parrot
Joined
May 22, 2008
Messages
1,264
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
6w7
I'm basically a commie according to American standards but I really do think people who are inventive, work hard, etc. have earned their money except when it gets to more than 10-fold of the capital of other people
Then it just becomes obscene. Reality check : people make 1000000000000...-fold more money than other people ! That's essentially what's wrong with capitalism imho. That, and the whole eternal growth ideology/religion, whilst living on a globe. Particulary companies who fire entire masses because they'll make less profit than initially expected. There's no justifiable logic in that.
I hate how capitalism is often considered as logical or rational. It's not. It's just survival of the most ruthless....imho.
 

Pionart

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
4,024
MBTI Type
NiFe
Wanting to get a lot of money for yourself isn't necessarily selfish, but wanting to spend a lot of money on yourself usually is.
 

entropie

Permabanned
Joined
Apr 24, 2008
Messages
16,767
MBTI Type
entp
Enneagram
783
Comunism and socialism are really two very different things. Socialism is the attempt to establish a social security for the lesser lucky in an otherwise capitalistic and rich country. I had a very bad leg injury last year, complicated fracture in the knee region and at the end of they day, it costed me nothing in terms of money. Just a lot of nerves and determination. I wonder what would have been, this happening to me, in a country with no social net, no healthcare. It would have probably ruined me.

SO while comunism maybe wants to prosecute the rich to give all their money to the poor, socialism tries to establish a security net in society for society. It is basically the attempt for teamwork instead of a one man show. I adhere very much to this concept, tho being no NF. It is a very logical one on the quest of survival.
 

ceecee

Coolatta® Enjoyer
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
15,913
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
8w9
Wanting to get a lot of money for yourself isn't necessarily selfish, but wanting to spend a lot of money on yourself usually is.

Are you saying if I work my ass off for my money, spending it on myself is selfish?
 

Virtual ghost

Complex paradigm
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
19,830
Comunism and socialism are really two very different things. Socialism is the attempt to establish a social security for the lesser lucky in an otherwise capitalistic and rich country. I had a very bad leg injury last year, complicated fracture in the knee region and at the end of they day, it costed me nothing in terms of money. Just a lot of nerves and determination. I wonder what would have been, this happening to me, in a country with no social net, no healthcare. It would have probably ruined me.

SO while comunism maybe wants to prosecute the rich to give all their money to the poor, socialism tries to establish a security net in society for society. It is basically the attempt for teamwork instead of a one man show. I adhere very much to this concept, tho being no NF. It is a very logical one on the quest of survival.


As a another European I think that it is sad that so many people around the world simply don't get this idea.
 

Xann

Permabanned
Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Messages
1,782
MBTI Type
INTJ
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
As a another European I think that it is sad that so many people around the world simply don't get this idea.

Many of us do, we just understand that only in an economy held back artificially by eliminating the forces of free market competition by way of socialism could something such as having to pay for their own leg surgery "ruin" someone. You are severely underestimating the power of capitalism (or the understandings of its advocates) because you have never experienced it to the extent others have.
 

Virtual ghost

Complex paradigm
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
19,830
Many of us do, we just understand that only in an economy held back artificially by eliminating the forces of free market competition by way of socialism could something such as having to pay for their own leg surgery "ruin" someone. You are severely underestimating the power of capitalism (or the understandings of its advocates) because you have never experienced it to the extent others have.


In more advanced stuff I am ok with Capitalism, however healthcare for me is the most basic human need and everyone has a right to get their problem solved ragardless of their social status. For example my buissnes partners make a few wrong decisions, we all lose our income/company, in that moment I brake a leg by accident and my life goes to hell. On the technological level of 21th century this is just stupid.


The problem with healthcare is that people who have problem(s) in this regard are in need that can't be postponed in many cases. What makes them ideal to be victims of blackmail that will come in the form of preverse medical bills. Or there are cases that because of administrative reasons persons insurance get cancel, or they say to a guy that he is ok even if he is not so that they don't have to treat him (what costs money)
Capitalism and healthcare make too many "what if" situations in one very important area of safety and therefore I don't consider this to be ideal solution. In my part of the world you can't find people who sold their house so that someone could go to therapy of some kind.

However once you turn the whole thing to market you are risking that money becomes more important than people and I find that problematic, since the main goal of healthcare is not money and it shouldn't be. What is extra problematic since everbody want to work for more so step by step doctors can rise prices where they drain people. (people who have no choice) While this way political figures exchange healthcare service for votes and have to make sure that it stays this way or othervise they will quickly lose quite a bit of votes, what keeps system in balanace. Actually in my country healthcare system is getting more and more capitalistic but it is also becoming more and more shity with that change. (for a number of reasons)


Therefore in this sphere of life I am perfectly ok with bypassing capitalism, especially since this factor calms the whole society since everbody knows that they are not going to die young because of some random complication in wrong time and that they will get the chance to fight their disease. Broken leg is one turn problem but there are plenty of deseases that need to be threated for years before improvement shows itself and this is where socialized healthcare shows it's strength.


My 2 cents on healthcare. (to be honest I was thinking about opening the thread about this topic)
 

Xann

Permabanned
Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Messages
1,782
MBTI Type
INTJ
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
In more advanced stuff I am ok with Capitalism, however healthcare for me is the most basic human need and everyone has a right to get their problem solved ragardless of their social status. For example my buissnes partners make a few wrong decisions, we all lose our income/company, in that moment I brake a leg by accident and my life goes to hell. On the technological level of 21th century this is just stupid.

The problem with healthcare is that people who have problem(s) in this regard are in need that can't be postponed in many cases. What makes them ideal to be victims of blackmail that will come in the form of preverse medical bills. Or there are cases that because of administrative reasons persons insurance get cancel, or they say to a guy that he is ok even if he is not so that they don't have to treat him (what costs money)
Capitalism and healthcare make too many "what if" situations in one very important area of safety and therefore I don't consider this to be ideal solution. In my part of the world you can't find people who sold their house so that someone could go to therapy of some kind.

However once you turn the whole thing to market you are risking that money becomes more important than people and I find that problematic, since the main goal of healthcare is not money and it shouldn't be. What is extra problematic since everbody want to work for more so step by step doctors can rise prices where they drain people. (people who have no choice) While this way political figures exchange healthcare service for votes and have to make sure that it stays this way or othervise they will quickly lose quite a bit of votes, what keeps system in balanace. Actually in my country healthcare system is getting more and more capitalistic but it is also becoming more and more shity with that change. (for a number of reasons)


Therefore in this sphere of life I am perfectly ok with bypassing capitalism, especially since this factor calms the whole society since everbody knows that they are not going to die young because of some random complication in wrong time and that they will get the chance to fight their disease. Broken leg is one turn problem but there are plenty of deseases that need to be threated for years before improvement shows itself and this is where socialized healthcare shows it's strength.


My 2 cents on healthcare. (to be honest I was thinking about opening the thread about this topic)


Yes, but these are a lot of "what if" situations and it is simply not realistic to expect them all to occur at the same time in anything but the most unfortunate and nearly statistically impossible situations imaginable. If a person manages to:

-Suddenly lose their job either due to illness or an illness coincidentally strikes at the same time
-Is unable to find a new job of the same level of income or type due to the nature of their illness
-Is unable to find a new job of a lower level of income with less hours due to the severity of their illness
-Is unable to receive any sort of existing welfare or unemployment from the government due to the their country being "full capitalist" in a sense
-Happens to have no money saved
-Happens to have no property or anything of any other value to be traded, loaned or sold
-Happens to have never had the opportunity to purchase health insurance
-Happens to have an administration error occur on their insurance forcing them to lose their coverage in this situation
-Happens to have no access to alternate medical venues that could offer services at a more reasonable price or expect payment at a future date once the person was back on their feet
-Happens to be denied taking out a loan out to pay for whatever medical procedure is needed
-Happens to have absolutely no family, friends, or acquaintances to fall back on financially or for support in other matters or who are willing to take out a loan for them in this situation that would clearly save their life
-Is unable to find any charities willing to give them a hand after explaining to them the sheer despair and desperation of their situation despite living in a society in which there is an awareness this situation is possible, enhancing the likelihood and popularity of medical charities
-Despite suffering all this the individual still desires medical treatment over blowing their brains out

If all of the above managed to happen at the exact same time to the exact same person, then I'd hazard a guess you'd be living in the Twilight Zone. The sheer infeasibility of these circumstances coming to fruition seeming like a likelihood that could only be staved off via the safety net only socialism could provide is a side-effect of an apparent lifelong subconscious psychological dependence on the government and never having to think of an alternative arrangement.
 

Virtual ghost

Complex paradigm
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
19,830
If all of the above managed to happen at the exact same time to the exact same person, then I'd hazard a guess you'd be living in the Twilight Zone. The sheer infeasibility of these circumstances coming to fruition seeming like a likelihood that could only be staved off via the safety net only socialism could provide is a side-effect of an apparent lifelong subconscious psychological dependence on the government and never having to think of an alternative arrangement.


Well, this is the core of the issue in a way. Since here there is a deficit of certaintly, so this socialized healthcare system is basically the last line of defence for many people and therefore they don't want to give it away. In theory I am ok with capitalistic healthcare but the prices must stay low and acceptable.


Silly real life example: 30% of my country are ex war zones where economy/infrastructure was completely destroyed and therefore many people moved to other parts of the country and young people especially moved to bigger cities or abroad. Therefore people who live in the devastated zones have to produce their own food and goverment gives them some small amounts of money so that they can pay their bills ( to the government companies). However those people have no means to pay typical healthcare bills and those people are mostly older people and simply can't live without some level of healthcare. What means that they would also go away if there is no healthcare for them, and only government can provide that for basically free to them. Therefore if this practice would end they would move to some cousains or children elsewere and leave the land completely empty. What means that the guys that invaded those places in the first place would just move into empty land and take it as their own.


Therefore to us healthcare is actually defense budget, since in the twilight zone everything is mixed up in a way it shouldn't be. I bet this scenario didn't occur to you. :D
 
Top