User Tag List

First 3111213

Results 121 to 128 of 128

  1. #121
    The High Priestess Amargith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    Enfp
    Enneagram
    497 sx/so
    Socionics
    IEE Fi
    Posts
    14,657

    Default

    I wouldnt say evil per se...more like..thorny. Handle with gloves, etc
    ★ڿڰۣ✿ℒoѵℯ✿ڿڰۣ★





    "Harm none, do as ye will”

  2. #122
    meh Salomé's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    5w4 sx/sp
    Posts
    10,540

    Default

    I even intimidate witches. Apparently.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ivy View Post
    Gosh, the world looks so small from up here on my high horse of menstruation.

  3. #123
    Filthy Apes! Kalach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Posts
    4,318

    Default

    Fi judgments can be neither hateful nor spiteful.
    Bellison uncorked a flood of horrible profanity, which, translated, meant, "This is extremely unusual."

    Boy meets Grr

  4. #124
    Filthy Apes! Kalach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Posts
    4,318

    Default

    *sigh*

    A person can be hateful or spiteful. People exist as items situated with respect to both the inner and outer words. So questions of motive, responsibility, appropriacy, and adequacy apply to them. Cognitive functions are unlike people in that they are not situated with respect to judgment in any environment other than their own. If they weren't, the notions of objective and subjective wouldn't exist and nor would people. To get to access the normal questions of people and persons by talking about cognitive functions, you have first, at minimum, to present the functions in dynamic opposition and as somehow joined.

    Consider, for example, hate and spite don't exist if there is no representation of other people and their position. There is no such judgment as hateful nor spiteful to make of Fi unless, at minimum, Te (or Fe) exists to compare people to people. And even then you need other people to exist first.

    Which necessarily presents us with the basic problem for the existence of pure function theory: that no function exists in any complete form, ever. Meaning, however useful function theory is in describing the underlying patterns of a person's cognition, individual cognitive structure always contains something more.
    Bellison uncorked a flood of horrible profanity, which, translated, meant, "This is extremely unusual."

    Boy meets Grr

  5. #125
    The High Priestess Amargith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    Enfp
    Enneagram
    497 sx/so
    Socionics
    IEE Fi
    Posts
    14,657

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Salomé View Post
    I even intimidate witches. Apparently.
    Not anymore. Took me a while to realise what kind of gloves I needed before handling the thorny variety of life, though, Ill admit. I prefer to work without gloves, normally, you see.
    ★ڿڰۣ✿ℒoѵℯ✿ڿڰۣ★





    "Harm none, do as ye will”

  6. #126
    meh Salomé's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    5w4 sx/sp
    Posts
    10,540

    Default

    Frankly, I don't care if you prefer to "work" without pants.
    You don't handle me sweetie. Ever.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ivy View Post
    Gosh, the world looks so small from up here on my high horse of menstruation.

  7. #127
    The High Priestess Amargith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    Enfp
    Enneagram
    497 sx/so
    Socionics
    IEE Fi
    Posts
    14,657

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Salomé View Post
    Frankly, I don't care if you prefer to "work" without pants.
    You don't handle me sweetie. Ever.
    That of course, is entirely your choice. I wasnt going to go out of my way to do that anyways. Though apparently we will bump into one another occasionally here, it seems. I think I will keep my gloves (and my pants) on for those special occasions
    ★ڿڰۣ✿ℒoѵℯ✿ڿڰۣ★





    "Harm none, do as ye will”

  8. #128
    Ginkgo
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Istbkleta View Post
    It does.



    Who is this Us? I don't believe I've met that person.
    Quote Originally Posted by Salomé View Post
    You've never met anyone who finds you ridiculous?
    I find that hard to believe...
    Quote Originally Posted by Randomnity View Post
    hmm, I assumed that was an exaggeration. If anyone truly thought someone was "evil" for a bit of sarcasm or direct language, that would be pretty ridiculous, I agree.
    Quote Originally Posted by Salomé View Post
    Plenty of people on here think I'm evil.
    Muhahahaha! Etc.
    Quote Originally Posted by KDude View Post
    That depends on what metal bands you listen to.
    Quote Originally Posted by Amargith View Post
    I wouldnt say evil per se...more like..thorny. Handle with gloves, etc
    Quote Originally Posted by Salomé View Post
    I even intimidate witches. Apparently.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kalach View Post
    Fi judgments can be neither hateful nor spiteful.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kalach View Post
    *sigh*

    A person can be hateful or spiteful. People exist as items situated with respect to both the inner and outer words. So questions of motive, responsibility, appropriacy, and adequacy apply to them. Cognitive functions are unlike people in that they are not situated with respect to judgment in any environment other than their own. If they weren't, the notions of objective and subjective wouldn't exist and nor would people. To get to access the normal questions of people and persons by talking about cognitive functions, you have first, at minimum, to present the functions in dynamic opposition and as somehow joined.

    Consider, for example, hate and spite don't exist if there is no representation of other people and their position. There is no such judgment as hateful nor spiteful to make of Fi unless, at minimum, Te (or Fe) exists to compare people to people. And even then you need other people to exist first.

    Which necessarily presents us with the basic problem for the existence of pure function theory: that no function exists in any complete form, ever. Meaning, however useful function theory is in describing the underlying patterns of a person's cognition, individual cognitive structure always contains something more.
    Quote Originally Posted by Amargith View Post
    Not anymore. Took me a while to realise what kind of gloves I needed before handling the thorny variety of life, though, Ill admit. I prefer to work without gloves, normally, you see.
    Quote Originally Posted by Salomé View Post
    Frankly, I don't care if you prefer to "work" without pants.
    You don't handle me sweetie. Ever.
    Quote Originally Posted by Amargith View Post
    That of course, is entirely your choice. I wasnt going to go out of my way to do that anyways. Though apparently we will bump into one another occasionally here, it seems. I think I will keep my gloves (and my pants) on for those special occasion

Similar Threads

  1. [Fi] Fi-Doms and Physical Feeling
    By Abbey in forum The NF Idyllic (ENFP, INFP, ENFJ, INFJ)
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10-28-2013, 05:44 AM
  2. Is there a connection between Te/Fi ratio and self-esteem ?
    By Virtual ghost in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-10-2009, 06:59 PM
  3. [INFJ] Communication and sincerity
    By Little Buddha in forum The NF Idyllic (ENFP, INFP, ENFJ, INFJ)
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 03-14-2009, 01:55 PM
  4. [MBTItm] Fi/Ti and being nice
    By wolfy in forum The SP Arthouse (ESFP, ISFP, ESTP, ISTP)
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 11-01-2008, 10:14 PM
  5. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-08-2007, 08:30 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO