So the original idea is "prevention" Now, just imagine the possibilities
Or the original idea could be.. "what could go wrong?" ha ha!!.. SO the playing field is pretty even I would think.
But in direct relation to what I meant. I meant conflict avoidance is everyone's responsibility.
Fe is not crying after the fact, "I trusted you, this was avoidable".
It would be avoidable if trust existed in the 1st place.
And what is the Fe user doing then.. giving away all their power??
I am seriously confused.. as usual..
EDIT: thinking about it.. I can just see myself doing exactly that very recently.
I went on about me being foolish for trusting someone and how it could have been avoided if the person was just consistent.. and not really giving their "intentions" a second thought . So go figure.