I mean you don't go to the church and question the existance of God.
We don't claim that the functions represent real biological processes. They're just made up, arbitrarily assigned categorizations of behavior.
There's no testable claim being made here. I can't prove that I'm an ENTP, and there's no proof of any types because they're just made up categories.
Do you ask for scientific proof that some movies are comedies and others are dramas? No, because they're just made up labels for ease of categorization. That's all this stuff is, not science, not testable, not anything but made up labels.
Originally Posted by Jaguar
What-you're not going to parrot Lenore Thomson for the noob?
No, Lenore gives a type test in her book, and I find all type testing ridiculous. Remember? (This is also why I don't really care about Singer-Loomis--all they've offered is another testing method for a concept I don't think can be tested at all.)
If you could be anything you want, I bet you'd be disappointed--am I right?