• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

[INFP] INFP preferred romantic type

INFP preferred romantic type

  • INFP

    Votes: 21 21.2%
  • INFJ

    Votes: 22 22.2%
  • ENFP

    Votes: 19 19.2%
  • ENFJ

    Votes: 26 26.3%
  • INTP

    Votes: 18 18.2%
  • INTJ

    Votes: 17 17.2%
  • ENTP

    Votes: 6 6.1%
  • ENTJ

    Votes: 14 14.1%
  • ISFP

    Votes: 6 6.1%
  • ISTP

    Votes: 2 2.0%
  • ESFP

    Votes: 2 2.0%
  • ESTP

    Votes: 2 2.0%
  • ISFJ

    Votes: 3 3.0%
  • ISTJ

    Votes: 2 2.0%
  • ESFJ

    Votes: 2 2.0%
  • ESTJ

    Votes: 2 2.0%
  • I am not an INFP

    Votes: 29 29.3%

  • Total voters
    99

Little_Sticks

New member
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
1,358
Little sticks I don't think you read the title of this thread. It's for INFPs. And you stick in a chart. A chart! :dont:

lol...I had to though. The discussion was turning into INFPs with ISTJs. I felt obliged to help the poor INFPs escape that tragic end. You have the rest of your lives to live! Think twice! Just say no, lol.

I thought it was cute someone would do that; though I do laugh at the data some.
Well if all else fails, at least you thought it was cute :)

Did you make this chart yourself? LMAO! :D

It seems like you just matched up all NFs, all SFs, all STs, and all NTs for the good and excellent matches....
Yes, I did. Well, that is one observation, but it is somewhat logical and complex. I used some set mathematics :)

I'm sure this chart was developed by rigorous investigation and data collection into the success rate and happiness levels of relationships from a large sample of people from all types.
Just a rigorous cognitive function mathematical investigation. It would be nice to do a sample, but I question whether one would get honest answers from couples. Sometimes people can deceive themselves especially if inexperienced with most of the types.

I don't get it. Is that chart saying that an INFP with undeveloped shadow functions is best matched with an ENFJ or another INFP with undeveloped shadow functions?

And ENFP and INFJ. Just that ENFJ and INFP are just slightly higher.

Basically, how this chart is supposed to work is that you take your type and average it with any other type(s) you are as well. Then your highest scores are your more ideal matches. You could do something like assign each rank a number value in with constant intervals between each value.

So if you are an INFP with developed functions to classify as two types then you would average the scores of both types together and get your highest compatibility types.

Okay, I don't know if anyone will want to read this part, but this is the logic I employed to come up with the table.
So how the chart works mathematically is that you take your dominant, auxiliary, tertiary, and inferior functions and pair them against the other types dominant, auxiliary, tertiary, and inferior functions. This is done in such a way that two totals are created: total similarity and total interest. How the similarity is calculated is that you take Fe paired with Fe and add the value of the lowest Fe score to similarity and do this with all the functions. Then interest is calculated by taking Fe paired with Fi, same cognitive function paired with its extravert/introvert opposite.
I assigned the values to dominant=8, auxiliary=8, tertiary=4, inferior=2, all shadow functions =1. And the total score is the summation of the similarity score and the interest score.
And when I did this I found five different types of values
24 28 30 32 34
Horrible Bad Neutral Good Excellent
 

Udog

Seriously Delirious
Joined
Aug 2, 2008
Messages
5,290
MBTI Type
INfp
Enneagram
9w1
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
Okay, I don't know if anyone will want to read this part, but this is the logic I employed to come up with the table.
So how the chart works mathematically is that you take your dominant, auxiliary, tertiary, and inferior functions and pair them against the other types dominant, auxiliary, tertiary, and inferior functions. This is done in such a way that two totals are created: total similarity and total interest. How the similarity is calculated is that you take Fe paired with Fe and add the value of the lowest Fe score to similarity and do this with all the functions. Then interest is calculated by taking Fe paired with Fi, same cognitive function paired with its extravert/introvert opposite.
I assigned the values to dominant=8, auxiliary=8, tertiary=4, inferior=2, all shadow functions =1. And the total score is the summation of the similarity score and the interest score.
And when I did this I found five different types of values
24 28 30 32 34
Horrible Bad Neutral Good Excellent

Heh, that's an interesting set of assumptions.

So basically:

1. A function is drawn to its introverted/extroverted opposite. Fi <-> Fe
2. In determining compatibility, both the dominate and auxiliary functions are equal (8 points), with a sharp drop to the tertiary relief function (4 points).
3. The interplay of a shadow function offers negligible compatibility, regardless of whether it's interplaying with another shadow or a dominate function.
4. On a population level, "interest" in the oppositely directed function plays as big of a factor as similarity.... for all types. (ENTJ - ENTJ is as likely to be as successful as INFJ - INFJ.)

Thoughts:
1) This is interesting. You may be onto something there.
2) Why are dom and aux equal? The dominate function pretty much defines us, while the auxiliary suggests how the dominate is executed and directed.
3) Why not just make shadow function interplay = 0 to clarify the negligible and equal effect they have?
4) Wouldn't some functions be better matched with its equivilant? Ni-Ni similarity seems to be pretty compatible. Te-Te seems to compete, and the similarity often breeds competition instead of melding.

Finally, the strongest matches are those that match perfectly with interest or with compatibility. This is a byproduct of the weighting system. Why do you believe this to be?
 

Little_Sticks

New member
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
1,358
...
Heh, that's an interesting set of assumptions.
1) This is interesting. You may be onto something there.
2) Why are dom and aux equal? The dominate function pretty much defines us, while the auxiliary suggests how the dominate is executed and directed.
3) Why not just make shadow function interplay = 0 to clarify the negligible and equal effect they have?
4) Wouldn't some functions be better matched with its equivilant? Ni-Ni similarity seems to be pretty compatible. Te-Te seems to compete, and the similarity often breeds competition instead of melding.

Finally, the strongest matches are those that match perfectly with interest or with compatibility. This is a byproduct of the weighting system. Why do you believe this to be?

Good points.

This is how I see it though

2) Equal because they are both quite strong and one sort of relies on the other, so to speak. It's as if you can't have one strong without the other strong as well, but feel free to disagree if you think you have a better understanding of why that might not be the case.
3) I could do that. But it just didn't seem plausible for shadow functions to start off as completely non-existent from the get-go, but that might be better. It shouldn't affect the results too much though since it is so lowly scored.
4) This is a good point. But this is how I thought about it, at a basic level it just seemed that if another person shared the same function that it would be easier to relate. So when you say Te - Te would compete more I would say that you are right and that each would generally enjoy the competition, since it is their nature with Te. But perhaps that's over-looking some things too much. But I think generally speaking, when the people are healthy, their function relation, such as Te - Te would be positive.

Well I couldn't determine much of a difference between similarity and interest. It is almost as if similarity is an interest and an interest is a similarity. I guess that's why I weighed them together instead of rating types who were more balanced as higher in this regard. If I was to do this the S types which are known to be bad matches with certain N types come up as best matches which I just know isn't true.
 

runvardh

にゃん
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
8,541
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
6w7
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
The other problem your chart misses is value set. It may not do much for SPs and NTs; but for SJs and NFs, we've gone to war about these things. Take a look at how even us INFPs will clash with each other about as much as we agree, if not more so for some of us. The incidence of this increases as balance decreases.
 

Little_Sticks

New member
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
1,358
The other problem your chart misses is value set. It may not do much for SPs and NTs; but for SJs and NFs, we've gone to war about these things. Take a look at how even us INFPs will clash with each other about as much as we agree, if not more so for some of us. The incidence of this increases as balance decreases.

I'm confused. Are you saying NFs are divided when it comes to whether or not they like SJs? Because naturally, I would imagine they wouldn't and the chart even shows that.

I suppose their can be security in SJs, but I think you might find that the SJs that NFs go for might have a more balanced J. I think a mostly SJ person would drive an NF crazy. But if some disagree, why would a mostly SJ person make a good relationship then?
 

runvardh

にゃん
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
8,541
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
6w7
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
I'm confused. Are you saying NFs are divided when it comes to whether or not they like SJs? Because naturally, I would imagine they wouldn't and the chart even shows that.

I suppose their can be security in SJs, but I think you might find that the SJs that NFs go for might have a more balanced J. I think a mostly SJ person would drive an NF crazy. But if some disagree, why would a mostly SJ person make a good relationship then?

More along the lines that NFs will fight NFs over difference of values; the more different they are, the more the two NFs will be against each other. Whether they put a pretty face on the outside or not is a different story. Hell, I find that on this forum I anger others of my type more often than I do any other type.
 

Bubbles

See Right Through Me
Joined
Mar 13, 2009
Messages
1,037
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
4w3
Socionics says INFp and ESTp are duals.
Your chart says NFs go with INFPs.
Keirsey says NTs and NFs are ideal.
Ennegram says 4 and 5 matches are electric (and many NTs are 5 and many INFPs are 4 ime.)
Opposites attract suggests ESTJs and INFPs.

But at the end of the day, it doesn't matter. It's what you yourself want to work towards committing yourself to.

Data means nothing. Doing means something.
 

sonata

New member
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Messages
291
MBTI Type
iNtJ
I'm starting to believe that the INFP/INTJ thing could be quite good.

I'm glad that at least a few of you agree. :D
 

Hendo Barbarosa

New member
Joined
Dec 26, 2008
Messages
197
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
5w4
Take it from someone who knows...it is REALLY good.

(addendum: that someone is me)
 

Little_Sticks

New member
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
1,358
Socionics says INFp and ESTp are duals.
Your chart says NFs go with INFPs.
Keirsey says NTs and NFs are ideal.
Ennegram says 4 and 5 matches are electric (and many NTs are 5 and many INFPs are 4 ime.)
Opposites attract suggests ESTJs and INFPs.

But at the end of the day, it doesn't matter. It's what you yourself want to work towards committing yourself to.

Data means nothing. Doing means something.
*puts on Unhealthy intj hat*
Come here bubbles, I have candy and hugs :devil:
*holds needle between legs as a metaphor*
it's okay, I won't burst your bubble.

Bubbles, you misunderstand my chart. It's about development. If you put an NT with An NF where each hasn't developed their the opposing feeling or thinkin the relationship will be problematic. But if you've developed your opposing thinking or feeling then the matchup will be good.

But I'm going to theorize that E and I and T and F hold special properties compared to S,N and P,J. I'll be back later with since I'm on my phone in class and it's going to die lol.

Edit: Nevermind, I'm not going to state my theory. I don't want to get attacked for having an idea. I don't think you all really care for that. I'll just bring it to the NTs...sigh
 

runvardh

にゃん
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
8,541
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
6w7
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
I'm starting to believe that the INFP/INTJ thing could be quite good.

I'm glad that at least a few of you agree. :D

And with some of us you don't have to compromize that much on rationality as long as you're cuddle friendly.
 

Bubbles

See Right Through Me
Joined
Mar 13, 2009
Messages
1,037
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
4w3
*puts on Unhealthy intj hat*
Come here bubbles, I have candy and hugs :devil:
*holds needle between legs as a metaphor*
it's okay, I won't burst your bubble.

Bubbles, you misunderstand my chart. It's about development. If you put an NT with An NF where each hasn't developed their the opposing feeling or thinkin the relationship will be problematic. But if you've developed your opposing thinking or feeling then the matchup will be good.

But I'm going to theorize that E and I and T and F hold special properties compared to S,N and P,J. I'll be back later with since I'm on my phone in class and it's going to die lol.

Edit: Nevermind, I'm not going to state my theory. I don't want to get attacked for having an idea. I don't think you all really care for that. I'll just bring it to the NTs...sigh

Theorize what you want, I made my own theory. And my theory is in the realm of relationships, it's what you put into it, not what you've got (personality-wise) initially. And yes, that includes developing sides of yourself that you're weaker in. But shouldn't everyone do that anyway? And don't we all, to some extent, grow up by doing that? I know I'd be screwed-up if I hadn't developed my extroversion or judging functions, for example.

Btw, if you remember, I didn't attack you alone. I also mentioned socionics, Keirsey, etc. It's not my intention to say "ZOMG LITTLE STICKS SUX IMA ATTACK HIM NAO." If anything you say offends me, I have the tact to do that personally, not on a forum.

Also I think if you haven't developed yourself at all, it doesn't matter who you're with, it's going to be an iffy gamble. :tongue:

So I will accept the hugs, but if you get that needle going, boy, it will not be pretty. And if you're going to hold in your theory just because I chose to present mine, that's your choice.
 

BlueinGreen

New member
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
105
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
4w5
Well I'm biased towards enfj because I'm with one...

On the other hand, were I not I could see myself with a fellow infp, an enfp, possibly an intp because most of the female intp's I'm friends with are super chill, remote chance of infj assuming lack of neuroticism, but probably no j's that aren't nf's, and s is also unlikey. But realistically they're all unlikely because I'm taken. :D
 

raindancing

actinomycetes
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
346
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
I'm married to an INTP (11 yrs), we have an excellent relationship. It's pretty much a perfect fit. :wubbie:

I also voted for ENTP, their energy is very attractive :D

Not sure about other NFs... haven't ever known any.
 
Top