Making someone angry in the way you want to depends on how easy to upset they are and how well you know them to know where to strike. It's kind of Machiavellian in the sense that you're basically going to take information they've revealed to you and use it against them. It also depends on how much you pay attention to what they say to know when they're in a vulnerable moment and if you retain that information.
It's so funny you start this topic because when santtu made his thread about faults I was going to write that I know I egotrip over the fact that I know how to get the people I'm close with going from 0-60 in anger pretty quickly.
Do whatever you're going to do then get the hell out of Dodge.
Relationships have normal ebbs and flows. They do not automatically get better and better when the participants learn more and more about each other. Instead, the participants have to work through the tensions of the relationship (the dialectic) while they learn and group themselves and a parties in a relationships. At times the relationships is very open and sharing. Other time, one or both parties to the relationship need their space, or have other concerns, and the relationship is less open. The theory posits that these cycles occur throughout the life of the relationship as the persons try to balance their needs for privacy and open relationship. Interpersonal Communication Theories and Concepts Social Penetration Theory 1 Social Penetration Theory 2 Social Penetration Theory 3