[Fi] Fi: You only get it if you got it

[miss fortune]

^

Fi is NOT an orgasm!

 

[Jack Flak]

Well, are you really faking then or are you listening to your unconscious? I often intetionally "forget" about certain things and then get an answer from seemingly nowhere. I don't think I'm faking that, I think it's unconscious thinking...but you can't do it on demand and therefore it doesn't equate that you'd do it often. I am not working on some major publication of Ti logic, lol.

I would refuse to actually fake emotion today in art, but I think I have, many years ago. What I do is indeed "listening" to emotion, however slight it starts out. It can be enhanced if dwelled upon.

If a person's lyrics are consistantly Fi (and not just the odd song or two) it stands to reason that is their dom feeling function.

I disagree here. Someone may regularly do the above to produce art, simply because they want to produce a certain kind of art, heartfelt art.

 

[heart]

He just admitted it would be too exhausting for him to want to do right now. No artist could build their career on a function that drained them. Just like I would be unlikely to major in Logic. I might be able to get an inspired logic based idea from time to time but I wouldn't build my career around this, I wouldn't be able to count on it well enough or understand it well enough.

 

[Jack Flak]

Heart: Watch this. It's another INTP songwriter: Interview with Interpol's Paul Banks

I had the wrong one pasted first, make sure you watch the one which is 6:57 long.

 

[disregard]

Here is an example of mimicking Fi:

A man is about to take a woman out on their fifth date.
Man stops by his mom's house as a surprise to introduce her to his woman.
His woman is embarrassed and a little annoyed that he would do that without telling her.
(Meanwhile, he thinks this will score him points)
He tells her that he's sorry, it meant a lot to him to introduce her to his mother since she's special.

That is Fi mimicked.

 

[SillySapienne]

^

Fi is NOT an orgasm!

Ummmm, I think, ohhhh, uh-huh, yeah, mmmhmm, uhhh, uh-huh, yess, that, ohhh, mmmhmm, that you, Ooooo, mmmmhmmm, definitely, uhhhh, mmmmm, just might, uh-huh, be right, yeahhhh, uh-huh!!!

LOL!!

 

[heart]

I disagree here. Someone may regularly do the above to produce art, simply because they want to produce a certain kind of art, heartfelt art.

They would exhuast themselves. It would be too hard to keep up. They might do one or two special works but not the body of their work overall. I really doubt that they'd want to create that kind of art, they'd have a different muse speaking to them.

 

[heart]

Heart: Watch this. It's another INTP songwriter: Interview with Interpol's Paul Banks

I had the wrong one pasted first, make sure you watch the one which is 6:57 long.

I can't do videos. My equipment can't handle it, lol. Sorry.

 

[Haphazard]

Captain Chick.

Things can be faked.

Like, you know, what I do all the time.

It's exhausting if you're not practiced, though.

 

[SillySapienne]

I would refuse to actually fake emotion today in art, but I think I have, many years ago. What I do is indeed "listening" to emotion, however slight it starts out. It can be enhanced if dwelled upon.

Fi ≠ Emotion

 

[heart]

Captain Chick.

Things can be faked.

Like, you know, what I do all the time.

It's exhausting if you're not practiced, though.

Your Fi wouldn't be faked.

But your Fe would be and isn't it exahusting?

My Fe is awful!

 

[Jack Flak]

Fi ≠ Emotion

You're really grasping at straws, and it's insulting you, me, and everyone else.

How's that for Fi?

 

[heart]

You're really grasping at straws, and it's insulting you, me, and everyone else.

How's that for Fi?

^Ti speaking for Fe. "Everyone else!" lol

 

[Haphazard]

Your Fi wouldn't be faked.

But your Fe would be and isn't it exahusting?

My Fe is awful!

I can act pleasant when it so pleases me.

Unfortunately for everyone else, it does not please me often.

 

[Jack Flak]

I can't do videos. My equipment can't handle it, lol. Sorry.

Sorry, heart! Well, if you're extremely interested (And I'm not saying you are), try to find some text interviews with Interpol's Paul Banks, perhaps.

 

[heart]

Sorry, heart! Well, if you're extremely interested (And I'm not saying you are), try to find some text interviews with Interpol's Paul Banks, perhaps.

I might later, I'm wasting too much of my time online tonight. And I said I wouldn't!

 

[SillySapienne]

Captain Chick.

Things can be faked.

Sure they can, but to use the example of a fake orgasm, one can fake it, but faking it doesn't make it so, i.e. the truth remains that the one who faked it did not in fact have an orgasm.

 

[heart]

I can act pleasant when it so pleases me.

Unfortunately for everyone else, it does not please me often.

Yes, so you're not likely to seek a career as a public relations person or a diplomat, just as a non-Fi isn't likely to build a career on Fi type works of art.

 

[Jack Flak]

^Ti speaking for Fe. "Everyone else!" lol

Confirmation bias, because you believe in function order. Violation of values isn't Fe.

 

[Jack Flak]

Yes, so you're not likely to seek a career as a public relations person or a diplomat, just as a non-Fi isn't likely to build a career on Fi type works of art.

The point is, and I just so know I'm right it hurts, is that when someone who isn't "Fi" does build a career on "Fi art," you're typing them as Fi anyway.