I would think they could be, since they have INFJ functions, the most super-intuitive of all the types, albeit in a different order, but of course, I could be wrong, and hence I need external input from the various members of the forum.
That’s not true; INTJs are the most-intuitive of All of the myers-briggs types, and ISTJs are for the sensing-types. Even after All of the things You saw on Raptor’s-website, You still don’t believe that ISTJs trump ISFPs when it comes to the Creative-process. Tony Parker is far-more N than @KDude, even though His tertiary-Ni comes before Tony Parker’s inferior-Ne. The reason why is since Tony drives down lanes that absolutely make sense in real-life situations involving Creative-problems-solving, whereas ISTPs like Speed Gavroche go with what comes up; the point is that Parker calculates-out what could Happen!
I think though that there is evidence in my favor, as of all the sensors on this forum, it seems that ISTPs are definately the most logical and NT-like, as well as the most interested in debates of a philosophical nature, so am I right?
That’s definitely not true; ISTJs and even ISFJs can determine things of a far more mystical/religious-nature than even the most wise-ENxP-types, since ENxPs go with what they want to do, whereas the ISxJ-types will search for meaning, sometimes even from mystical-premonitions that come from their own inner-divine-nature. The evidence for this is simple: while ISFPs are out throwing parties, ISFJs are studying what’s been sparkled.
But what if an N function augemented by Ti has better powers, like it could give it an extra depth of focus or something I would think.
Ti-doms on-average are shit compared to Within’s introspective-gaze inside of His Will, although some Ti-doms such as @Rasofy are far more open to what people think.
I'd say ISFPs tend to be. ISTPs can have really brilliant flashes of intuitive insight but I think the more linear nature of Ti somewhat restricts the operation of non-linear Ni, whereas F is more mutable.
That’s not true at All; ISTPs are a little-bit more-refined with their intuitions on-average, since they will think about things that pretty-much Every ISFP wants to believe just restricts their option for immediate-“pleasure”, but it’s not really pleasure because it’s just what Satan Wished for them Presentably?
I find that Ni for me is quite strong especially as I keep getting older I'm able to really see patterns that become more and more predictable. I also have a general interest in abstract weird shit sometimes like UFO's, quantum physics, space and the universe which I find are all Ni related.
This guy is definitely not an ISTP; He’s an ISTJ that’s checking the evidence out, whereas an ISTP on-average would scoff at such claims and go back to riding motorcycles, where His tertiary-Ni helps to keep Him from falling into a ditch.
I do not think they are the most habitually intuition engaging. That award would maybe go to ESFP or some other SF. I do think they and ESTP's are the most efficient of the entire spectrum at utilizing intuition, between mental and physical tasks.
@superunknown speaks very-wisely here by not appealing to cognitive-functions, but rather trusting @uumlau by going with systems-dynamics instead of “expert-classifier” as seen on Dario Nardi’s EEGs. But still, this goes more towards ISTx in-general.
Keep in mind, ISTP's are famous for having the Ti/Ni loop, which as i have observed with myself brings them both into an even plane, probably why we often mistype as INTJ's.
Most people in Ti-Ni loops don’t trust what the outside-evidence may Present, and they sure as hell don’t even believe that it’s even possible to be on-plane with Montalk.
It's a fairly common mistype, and I've witnessed it in several people I know.
ISTP's Se can simulate a pseudo-Te in the Ti-Se mechanism, meaning that they might appear heavy Te when it is actually Se in overdrive. The difference is that the ISTP will be much more aggressive and will make sense of the data they are provided and decide on what is rationalized internally. Usually the asshole-ish people that seem like INTJ can sometimes be ISTPs with a better grip on Ni, and in Socionics, the ISTj Hidden Agenda Ni will sometimes inflate Ni to a power much like the Dominant function. (Though, it is often called the 'Pathetic' Hidden Agenda, so usually it is seen as amusing by Ego block Ni users)
I've heard before that ISTPs are the most intuitive sensor, but honestly, I think the ISFP is much more intuitive-inclined by nature, especially when the ISFP is a Type 9 (one of its more common enneatypes), which completely stifles and confuses aux. Se, meaning that the Fi-Ni mechanism will develop and kick into place as a crutch for the ambivalent, hesitant Type 9 Se. I am also of the opinion that certain individuals in a type may be more intuitive than others, meaning that there could be an ESTP with exceptional introverted intuition compared to that of a poorly developed ENTJ, for instance.
This entire comment pretty-much is bullshit, and He’s being SuperUnknown’s reference-station.
Feeling is closer in line with intuition, as is introversion, and as such, I would say ISFx types to be closest to something resembling an intuitive type.
Again Super-Unknown is being a Mastermind here by trusting what could possibly fit within actual type-dynamics when it comes to how the functions of S and F interact together with an introverted-focus rather than what @Zarathustra bullshits people with when She says that ISFPs are smarter than ISTPs (Nights and Days may be a rare-exception to this principle).
I see I've already participated, but you're getting my opinion again.
Now You know why SuperUnknown is more-likely to be Your Master.
I have an ISTP friend that I thought was INTJ at first just because she is so good at deducing the end result of events, and how clearly she sees patterns. However, she is far too mechanically inclined and in the moment present to be such a type.
This woman that @Saturned is referencing is actually an INTJ who was very strongly-convinced that She was probably an ISTP, and Saturned sure as hell better get Her ass off of the type-description (somewhat augmented by Satan), and start looking at who’s actually more NF-like between that woman and Her ENFJ-Present (Jar Jar Binks)!
imo, it's a tie between ISFP and ISTP. ISTPs are more intellectual, but ISFPs are more likely to trust their intuition
@Elfboy, You better start looking at Ash from Pokemon, and tell @Speed Gavroche why He Loves.