That post was right after I arrived here and I'll freely admit I didn't understand anything about functions yet.
I was still operating under the four sliding scale MBTI system exclusively.
But um, I think people who have read a lot more of my posts than you will vouch for my ENTPness. I did retreat into some Fe+Si territory vs. zarc there because I ran out of arguments and didn't have the theoretical background to fully understand what was going on.
Of course, I didn't understand at the time that that was what I was doing, but...looking back on that thread now, it makes sense.
oh yeah, that is exactly what an ENTP would have done.
Have you ever seen what a real ENTP does when he/she runs out of arguments??
They make the whole thing a joke, and make you (the person who won the argument) feel like a fool for arguing to ever win.
Nothing like reading someone try and explain a function they know absolutely nothing about.
Stick to rattling your chains about Ne. Ni is out of your league.
"Who needs facts, evidence, and 'reality' when you have Ni?"
If you don't know who I just quoted, quit talking about Ni to Lauren when you know nothing about it to begin with.
[Good description of Ni]
Thank you, and correct. Sim just likes to debate and go crazy like a madman, apparently. And I don't. So I'm ISFJ. Very interesting...
Sim was going after Lauren (who has a preference for INFJ) in this thread,
bullshitting her about Ni when he knows nothing about Ni to begin with.
I may not directly experience Ni, but I have about as good a theoretical understanding of it as Ne+Ti's perception style is going to get.
I might point out your own proportional blind spot in Ne, a function you recently claimed to have in equal proportion to Ni (if that doesn't show Ne ignorance, I don't know what does.)
Originally Posted by Jaguar
I'd rather be an "asshole" who knows what he's talking about,
than an asshole who doesn't know what he's talking about.
Sim doesn't know what he's talking about.
By the way, I read that Zarc-Simulated thread a long time ago.
It's funny as hell.
What's especially funny about that thread was that despite being new at this I still knew enough to recognize which type description zarc's little "trick" came from.
She tried to pull a fast one by listing ESFP profile traits and asking if I identified with them, and then still thought she'd succeeded when I pointed out that they sounded more ESFP than ENTP.
And then the part where she claimed ESFP and ENTP have nothing in common at all; that was funny too. Pe+Ji as a mode of interaction shares the same exploratory/"leap in and figure it out as you go" attitude across all four ExxP; in fact, this similarity itself is evident throughout the above linked thread and explains zarc's typological misread.
If you could be anything you want, I bet you'd be disappointed--am I right?
proving SW wrong as well as his alleged lack of 'knowledge' may be enjoyable and needed, but he is entitled to his opinion as well as explanation as to why he thinks she isn't using Ni. However, I don't think this topic was created for long-ass debates. Other than that, I was semi-joking anyways, especially about the way I..formulated it