User Tag List

First 1234 Last

Results 11 to 20 of 44

  1. #11
    Senior Member Misty_Mountain_Rose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    4w5
    Posts
    1,123

    Default

    I still stick with my original answer. Assuming its a REAL thing, given enough time surely anything can be 'summarized'. You did it rather nicely there just now though. Kudos!

    It seems though that it was another rhetorical question, of which I wasn't aware until just now...
    Embrace the possibilities.

  2. #12
    Senior Member Qre:us's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    4,909

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Misty_Mountain_Rose View Post
    I still stick with my original answer. Assuming its a REAL thing, given enough time surely anything can be 'summarized'. You did it rather nicely there just now though. Kudos!

    It seems though that it was another rhetorical question, of which I wasn't aware until just now...
    Ha, fair enough. I know you were reading the lit, but, there's no such thing as 'real' or 'fake' in statistics. It's a numbers manipulation game with justification of drawing inferences. There's no spinning that's 'wrong'. Only that which is more (or way less) applicable to a given situation.

  3. #13
    にゃん runvardh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    MBTI
    INFP
    Enneagram
    6w7 sx/so
    Socionics
    IEI
    Posts
    8,559

    Default

    Shaken or stirred?
    Dreams are best served manifest and tangible.

    INFP, 6w7, IEI

    I accept no responsibility, what so ever, for the fact that I exist; I do, however, accept full responsibility for what I do while I exist.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  4. #14
    Senior Member Misty_Mountain_Rose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    4w5
    Posts
    1,123

    Default

    Dear Rebel Kitteh - "Variety is the spice of life"
    Embrace the possibilities.

  5. #15
    にゃん runvardh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    MBTI
    INFP
    Enneagram
    6w7 sx/so
    Socionics
    IEI
    Posts
    8,559

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Misty_Mountain_Rose View Post
    Dear Rebel Kitteh - "Variety is the spice of life"
    Dreams are best served manifest and tangible.

    INFP, 6w7, IEI

    I accept no responsibility, what so ever, for the fact that I exist; I do, however, accept full responsibility for what I do while I exist.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  6. #16
    Emerging Tallulah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    MBTI
    INTP
    Posts
    6,028

    Default

    Dear INTJ,

    Do woodchucks really chuck wood?
    Something Witty

  7. #17
    Senior Member Misty_Mountain_Rose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    4w5
    Posts
    1,123

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tallulah View Post
    Dear INTJ,

    Do woodchucks really chuck wood?
    I give thee, for thy reading pleasure:


    WikiAnswers - How much wood would a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood

    Some say it depends on three factors:


    The woodchuck's desire to chuck said wood.

    The woodchuck's need to chuck the aforementioned wood.

    The woodchuck's ability to chuck the wood.
    Others say:


    He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

    If he could chuck wood, the woodchuck would chuck as much as he could!

    A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

    A woodchuck would chuck all the wood that the woodchuck would chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

    If a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would and should chuck wood. But if woodchucks can't chuck wood, they shouldn't and wouldn't chuck wood. Though were I a woodchuck, and I chucked wood, I would chuck wood with the best woodchucks that chucked wood.

    If a woodchuck could chuck wood, then s/he'd chuck all the wood, s/he'd chuck and chuck and chuck and chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

    It would chuck the amount of wood that she sells seashells on the seashore divided by how many pickles Peter Piper picks.

    One quarter of a sycamore if you give him a quarter for every quarter of the sycamore he cut.

    It might depend on how many female woodchucks were present. Or, it could depend on whether the woodchuck's mother-in-law was around or not. If she was, he'd be chucking all day. If not, he'd be watching the football game.

    Some maintain that woodchucks could not and would not chuck wood at all.

    It depends on how good his dentures are!

    A woodchuck, would chuck, as much wood, as a woodchuck, could chuck, If a woodchuck could chuck wood. But unfortunately, woodchucks do not chuck wood.

    About 5.72 fluid litres of wood

    About as many boards as the Mongol hoards would hoard if the Mongol hordes did hoard boards.

    Um....... 23????



    Tons. More than you can count. Honestly. No one can chuck more would than a woodchuck.

    If the woodchucks name was Maurice, then it could chuck all the wood that it wants to. However, if its name is Frank, no chucking would be for it.

    Due to the average size of a wood chuck and the general density of wood (not including cork) if a wood chuck could chuck wood it would probably get through about 6.573 pounds per day, assuming the wood chuck is functioning correctly.

    Using the formula: (W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1. As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3. However, Chuck Norris' awesome roundhouse kick declares that all decimal points cannot be used in formulas such as this, and so it must be rounded to the final solution of 69 units of wood.
    How Chuck Norris got involved

    A woodchuck would only chuck as much would as Chuck Norris would allow it to, because the woodchuck shares Chuck's name. Therefore, Chuck must punish it and make it chuck as much wood as Chuck can. So, a woodchuck would chuck as much wood as Chuck could.

    None cuz a wood chuck cant chuck wood! :P

    Approximately 3.9675 pounds every 5.6843 seconds. So there.

    2.865 lbs every 11.3686 Seconds?

    About 15 pounds a minute.

    i speak differently i say WHAT DOES YOUR QUESTION HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING! and btw its 84% lol

    it depends how good his dentures are!!!

    As much as he needed to be satisfied

    But the true jokey answer, as told by my grandfather is: As much wood as a woodchuck could chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

    a woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood



    Are you kidding? Everybody knows a woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

    But it definitely couldn't chuck Chuck Norris.
    Embrace the possibilities.

  8. #18
    Permabanned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Posts
    253

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Misty_Mountain_Rose View Post
    I give thee, for thy reading pleasure:


    WikiAnswers - How much wood would a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood

    Some say it depends on three factors:


    The woodchuck's desire to chuck said wood.

    The woodchuck's need to chuck the aforementioned wood.

    The woodchuck's ability to chuck the wood.
    Others say:


    He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

    If he could chuck wood, the woodchuck would chuck as much as he could!

    A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

    A woodchuck would chuck all the wood that the woodchuck would chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

    If a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would and should chuck wood. But if woodchucks can't chuck wood, they shouldn't and wouldn't chuck wood. Though were I a woodchuck, and I chucked wood, I would chuck wood with the best woodchucks that chucked wood.

    If a woodchuck could chuck wood, then s/he'd chuck all the wood, s/he'd chuck and chuck and chuck and chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

    It would chuck the amount of wood that she sells seashells on the seashore divided by how many pickles Peter Piper picks.

    One quarter of a sycamore if you give him a quarter for every quarter of the sycamore he cut.

    It might depend on how many female woodchucks were present. Or, it could depend on whether the woodchuck's mother-in-law was around or not. If she was, he'd be chucking all day. If not, he'd be watching the football game.

    Some maintain that woodchucks could not and would not chuck wood at all.

    It depends on how good his dentures are!

    A woodchuck, would chuck, as much wood, as a woodchuck, could chuck, If a woodchuck could chuck wood. But unfortunately, woodchucks do not chuck wood.

    About 5.72 fluid litres of wood

    About as many boards as the Mongol hoards would hoard if the Mongol hordes did hoard boards.

    Um....... 23????



    Tons. More than you can count. Honestly. No one can chuck more would than a woodchuck.

    If the woodchucks name was Maurice, then it could chuck all the wood that it wants to. However, if its name is Frank, no chucking would be for it.

    Due to the average size of a wood chuck and the general density of wood (not including cork) if a wood chuck could chuck wood it would probably get through about 6.573 pounds per day, assuming the wood chuck is functioning correctly.

    Using the formula: (W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1. As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3. However, Chuck Norris' awesome roundhouse kick declares that all decimal points cannot be used in formulas such as this, and so it must be rounded to the final solution of 69 units of wood.
    How Chuck Norris got involved

    A woodchuck would only chuck as much would as Chuck Norris would allow it to, because the woodchuck shares Chuck's name. Therefore, Chuck must punish it and make it chuck as much wood as Chuck can. So, a woodchuck would chuck as much wood as Chuck could.

    None cuz a wood chuck cant chuck wood! :P

    Approximately 3.9675 pounds every 5.6843 seconds. So there.

    2.865 lbs every 11.3686 Seconds?

    About 15 pounds a minute.

    i speak differently i say WHAT DOES YOUR QUESTION HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING! and btw its 84% lol

    it depends how good his dentures are!!!

    As much as he needed to be satisfied

    But the true jokey answer, as told by my grandfather is: As much wood as a woodchuck could chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

    a woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood



    Are you kidding? Everybody knows a woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

    But it definitely couldn't chuck Chuck Norris.
    It is posts like this that make me ashamed of my own type.

  9. #19

    Default

    Huh huh. Wood.
    Everybody have fun tonight. Everybody Wang Chung tonight.

    Johari
    /Nohari

  10. #20
    Sniffles
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KristenSnowdeal View Post
    Why are INTJ's so much better than everyone else?
    Delusions of grandeur perhaps?

Similar Threads

  1. Ask an ISFP, get a simple answer.
    By wolfy in forum The Fluff Zone
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 09-24-2015, 08:47 PM
  2. Ask an ENFP, get a flirty answer
    By Amargith in forum The Fluff Zone
    Replies: 115
    Last Post: 06-11-2009, 08:13 PM
  3. Ask an ENTP get a nasty answer
    By entropie in forum The Fluff Zone
    Replies: 171
    Last Post: 06-11-2009, 12:33 PM
  4. Ask an INTJ, get a terse answer
    By Haphazard in forum The Fluff Zone
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-10-2009, 10:57 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO