The idea is interesting. However, I am curious as to how one could communicate more abstract
and nuanced ideas with so few words.
A lack of context-specific vocabulary would make things difficult, I think. So it makes sense that
this language would be used to communicate simple, factual things. I do see the similarities
to Esperanto, and I remember reading that Esperanto was an attempt at a universal language.
This begs the question, then: Is language better, more meaningful, and more accessible
in its simplest form?