Was this directed towards me? I didn't think it was originally but everyone else seems to think it was. If so, I'm curious as to why you think I'd be someone that they'd have trouble with? Has the dirty political rhetoric already begun!?!?!
It was in reference to the idea of nominating Salome.
Go to sleep, iguana.
INTP. Type 1>6>5. sx/sp. Live and let live will just amount to might makes right
This would sound good to me if I weren't advocating @SmileyMan's candidacy with all my heart. And another nomination for @erm - he sounds calm and measured judging by his posts and has a sense of humour to round it off.
Yes, nominate someone all the other moderators would have trouble with who'd probably hate to be a moderator herself.
Actually I honestly think that this would be the best criteria to encourage the diversity of thought necessary to ensure justice and equity (albeit not not guaranteeing by the mere presence of a token outsider; the power to veto would help).
I redact everything I have written or will write on this forum prior to, subsequent with and or after the fact of its writing. For entertainment purposes only and not to be taken seriously nor literally.
Originally Posted by Edgar
Spamtar - a strange combination of boorish drunkeness and erudite discussions, or what I call "an Irish academic"