User Tag List

First 8161718

Results 171 to 173 of 173

  1. #171
    Tier 1 Member LunaLuminosity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    MBTI
    ENTP
    Enneagram
    7w6 so/sp
    Socionics
    ILE
    Posts
    2,484

    Default

    tl:dr

    but a lot of you seem to be pretending to be Js

    but a lot of the logic isn't really meshing together


    ...I'm in the mood for tacos

  2. #172
    Reason vs Being ragashree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    Mine
    Enneagram
    1w9
    Posts
    1,770

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaguar View Post
    The above is a Te-bashing ENTP, with an inferiority complex.
    *ping!* Damnit, Jag, that was a good one

    Quote Originally Posted by Tamske View Post
    This is possible. I thought of a Feeler because ragashree's character took everything personally. At the other hand, Feelers tend to be somewhat more subtle, tactful and thus not clear at all in their statements.
    I'm still waiting on someone to guess my type.
    'Twas some immature tertiary Fe, perhaps. The typological paradigm I'm currently applying suggests that the best fit for the characteristics of your own type is ISTJ, followed by ESTJ. There's a lot of Te reliance on externalised functional categories as opposed to internalised theoretical ones from what I'm seeing, and the somewhat pedantic insistence on the need to apply a specific category in the name of accuracy as opposed to accepting a broader category that still encompasses it as meaningful suggests that the very obvious Si regard for concrete factual information is dominant rather than secondary. Te in the primary position may choose to focus more strongly on the logic of the opponent's argument at this stage, whereas you defensively insist that your own narrowly defined perspective on typological categorisation needs to be agknowledged, which seems to be an attempt to mould the opponent's position to fit your own internalised expectations.

    Quote Originally Posted by LunaLuminosity View Post
    tl:dr

    but a lot of you seem to be pretending to be Js

    but a lot of the logic isn't really meshing together


    ...I'm in the mood for tacos
    A lazy ISFP? I need more to go on though. The casual self-indulgence of refusing to read the whole thread may suggest Se, but this is extremely conditional logic at this stage. The preference for eating tacos over posting anything important is more strongly emphasised as direct physical gratification and therefore implies Se with a greater degree of certitude, aditionally reinforcing the earlier interpretation; and the fact that this preference is based on subjective mood implies the presence of Fi. Lack of concrete attention paid to the content of the thread itself provides some circumstantial evidence for the Se preference being auxiliarry as opposed to primary. The vague and unsubstantiated assumption that the whole thread has been let down by weak logic suggests use of a weak tertiary or inferior Te usage to determine logical content, which again fits well with an xSFP typing.
    Look into my avatar. Look deep into my avatar...

  3. #173
    Writing... Tamske's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    MBTI
    ENTP
    Posts
    1,764

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ragashree View Post
    *ping!* Damnit, Jag, that was a good one
    'Twas some immature tertiary Fe, perhaps.
    I thought: a good Ti-user wouldn't see "your Ti seems low" as an insult, only as a false statement and try to disprove it!
    The typological paradigm I'm currently applying suggests that the best fit for the characteristics of your own type is ISTJ, followed by ESTJ. There's a lot of Te reliance on externalised functional categories as opposed to internalised theoretical ones from what I'm seeing, and the somewhat pedantic insistence on the need to apply a specific category in the name of accuracy as opposed to accepting a broader category that still encompasses it as meaningful suggests that the very obvious Si regard for concrete factual information is dominant rather than secondary. Te in the primary position may choose to focus more strongly on the logic of the opponent's argument at this stage, whereas you defensively insist that your own narrowly defined perspective on typological categorisation needs to be agknowledged, which seems to be an attempt to mould the opponent's position to fit your own internalised expectations.
    It was ESTJ. I tried to make the E come out by telling others what they should do, eg. the comments at Fluffywolf's character about how he should play the game and how he should plan before starting to work in his garden... To me, the biggest difference between E and ISTJs is that the ESTJs try to make others act the "right" way too.
    I thought my biggest mistake is letting the thread slip at some point, which was a mistake against my character's reliable J-ness.

    No, right now I'm not playing a type.
    Got questions? Ask an ENTP!
    I'm female. I just can't draw women

Similar Threads

  1. Impersonate a random TypoC member in this thread
    By UnitOfPopulation in forum The Bonfire
    Replies: 693
    Last Post: 02-25-2016, 05:21 AM
  2. Passive voice is to be abused in this thread
    By ygolo in forum The Fluff Zone
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: 08-31-2015, 01:31 AM
  3. Last person to post in this thread gets a diamond ring!
    By Samvega in forum The Fluff Zone
    Replies: 1051
    Last Post: 08-28-2009, 05:30 PM
  4. Replies: 36
    Last Post: 06-25-2009, 02:53 PM
  5. Free Waffles in this Thread
    By Cady in forum Welcomes and Introductions
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 06-04-2009, 05:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO