To me, intuition is creating all sorts of general principles and connections; they can be right or wrong, useful or useless, helpful or mean; good or evil;...
It's worth nothing unless you check your theories with sensing.
The Old Greeks thought the planets moved in circles because circles were the most perfect shapes (N).
Tycho Brahe composed huge lists with observations of the stars and the planets (S).
Kepler derived some general principles (eg. planets move in ellipses) from Brahe's list (N) and checked them with experiments (S).
Newton proposed a general law of attraction for gravity (N) and checked if Kepler's laws were consistent with it (N).
Einstein realized Newton's laws were inconsistent with electricity and composed some theory called relativity which united them (N).
Relativity predicted slightly different movements for the planets, especially for Mercury. These have been observed (S).
The planets influence our future. eg, if Mars is in your sign, some turbulent period is awaiting you because the planet Mars is named after the Roman war god. The identification is because Mars is red (N).
There is no observed correlation between the motion of the planets and the events here on Earth (except for the motion of Earth, which is notably absent in astrology, and which does influence our lives by creating day and night and seasons) (S).
There is more to the world than that what can be observed! (N)
I especially hate the "Intuition sees the world on a deeper, more fundamental level" crap. It doesn't. Only the combination can advance our knowlegde. Sensing only doesn't see the generalities which are necessarily abstract. Intuition only sees millions of general laws and mostly wrong ones. The combination of S and N doesn't have to be in the same person, even. Brahe didn't derive general laws, but without him Kepler wouldn't have done it. Unfortunately, only Newton and Einstein, the great Ns, have got the recognition they earned. So remember Tycho Brahe, the great S.