Meh.
L bot: n1 = 0 1 2 3 4 5
R bot: n2 = 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
11(n1+n2)={n1+n2+1 or n1+n21}
n1+n2=5 or 6
step 1: L sees {0123456}, 6 produces "yes" so n2 != 6
step 2: R sees {012345}, 0 produces "yes" so n1 != 0
step 3: L sees {012345} ... n2 != 5
setp 4: R sees {12345} ... n1 != 1
step 5: L sees {01234} ... n2 != 4
setp 6: R sees {2345}, only 2 produces "yes" so n1 = 2
Since n2 != 4, n2 must be 3
User Tag List

05092009, 06:43 PM #11

05092009, 06:50 PM #12
Will I be kicked out of the NT club if I say I hate math?
Embrace the possibilities.

05092009, 06:55 PM #13
Accept the past. Live for the present. Look forward to the future.
Robot Fusion
"As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance." John Wheeler
"[A] scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." Richard Feynman
"[P]etabytes of [] data is not the same thing as understanding emergent mechanisms and structures." Jim Crutchfield

05092009, 07:12 PM #14
Reread it hopefully. So we know how much is left? Remainder = x.
N^2  2N +1 = X ??
N^2  2N + (1X) = 0
Quadratic formula shenanigans
N = 1 + X^(1/2) or N = 1  X^(1/2) ??
Heh, I came online today to get away from calculus hmk (I don't do so well in that class, go figure. )

05092009, 07:29 PM #15
See, that wasn't particularly hard was it?
But for a full explanation you need a bit more:
For instance, because the square vial's width is a positive value (no such thing as a vial with zero or negative width), we know the magic number is positive.
So what if N = 1  X^(1/2)<=0?
Also, as a general note to people, based on comments I've recieved on the puzzles. It is very imortant to make assumptions/interpretations and to keep track of those assumtions, and then go back and check those assumptions to see if they still make sense. One of the best Engineering professors at Cal. Tech. used to advise his students to "leave behind a wake of assumptions" when solving a problem.
Accept the past. Live for the present. Look forward to the future.
Robot Fusion
"As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance." John Wheeler
"[A] scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." Richard Feynman
"[P]etabytes of [] data is not the same thing as understanding emergent mechanisms and structures." Jim Crutchfield
Similar Threads

Allow me to reintroduce myself, my name is
By Ivy in forum Welcomes and IntroductionsReplies: 80Last Post: 12242009, 03:13 PM 
This is just beginning to get on my nerves...
By MerkW in forum What's my Type?Replies: 69Last Post: 01212008, 12:54 PM 
Trying to figure out my friend.
By Ypsilon in forum MyersBriggs and Jungian Cognitive FunctionsReplies: 2Last Post: 01202008, 10:43 PM 
Somethings I need to get off my chest
By Sona in forum The BonfireReplies: 34Last Post: 09142007, 03:30 AM