Well, based on some recent threads, where NTs and NFs are arguing and cannot find an agreement, but also on my observations over time, I'm getting more and more convinced about something:
NTs and NFs have a very hard time understanding each other, in means of their opinions on some serious topics.
NTs operate on the rational reasonings, and it just doesn't make sense for them to rely anyhow on emotions in serious truth-finding. They must see logic in everything. They know that NFs are somewhat emotional, but I guess they take them, as they were "sentimental". They don't understand that NFs live on emotions, and that for them is important what they feel about things, not what is logical interpretation of things. NTs just don't copy that, perhaps it's not surprising, because they are Ts. They don't work on this wavelength.
Similarly, NFs can have a hard time debating with NTs. NFs can be really annoyed and puzzled, when they consider deep, interpersonal thing, and NT analyse that and apply logic, and "don't feel the real meaning". In other words, NTs apply logic and cold rational methods even where that souldn't be used, and that bugs NFs.
So I think that realms of NTs and NFs are really different in particular matters, and it's very hard to agree on such things for them. They work on different mechanisms and causally cannot understand the each other.
I'm not saying that thinking or feeling approach is better here. They are just different, and both have pros and cons. And each one can supplement what the other one lack, then.
What do you think?
How can NTs and NFs understand each other well?