This poll and thread is being conducted with the explicit permission of the subject.
I argue that his message is often difficult to understand, if not completely unintelligible.
The reasons for this, I speculate are as follows.
1)He tries to present too many ideas at the same time, mistakenly believing that they are connected when they are not. As a result he ends up spewing word salad.
2)He lacks attention to detail and therefore forgets to clarify what exactly he means. His notions of what is 'factual information' is distorted by his imagination and for this reason what he regards as factual information cannot be seen by others as factual information. He does this because he gets carried away by his hunches, or looses touch with his sensing faculty.
3)Because he is so deeply absorbed in his Intuitive faculty, he forgets that he inhabits a concrete, physical world, mistakenly believing that his world of hunches is the only world that exists. Therefore he excuses himself from the responsibility to explain his thoughts to others.
Lets examine this post of Nocapszy's to see how he engages in the 2 activities above.
How nocapszy supports the assertion:
Is this a reasonable expectation?
I think not and my reason for thinking so have been explained in points 1 and 2.
Lets analyze his post further to see how this is the case.
Nocapszy makes this remark next.
This does not endorse a point made in statement 1 or 2, but certainly endorses point 3.
What exactly does he mean in the first sentence? Unclear. Furthermore it is unclear how poriferan and bluedogma connect to the initial point he wishes to make. Clearly appears to be a result of a disjunction between what appears to his intuitions as plausible and what is clearly plausible to others.
In other words, I am not apparent as he said earlier, its the readers problems and not his that he is understood, yet there is nothing in his posts that runs contrary to the quality of being objective.
If his writing was objective, or accessible to all it would be easy for all to understand, in other words it would be apparent.
Nocapszy may argue that his thoughts are objective or in tune with the laws of logical reasoning, but he is not able to make this clear to everyone. Though, then obviously, it is difficult to see how the 2 claims are connected in this context moreover, what the statement that precedes those 2 statements "
This gives us enough of a reason to think that Nocapszy's writing is unintelligible. His writing is unintelligible if this post is a proper sample of his writing on MBTIc. I would argue that it is, as many of his posts are presented in a very similar fashion to this one.
This, as I have mentioned, appears to be evidence of Nocapszy confusing his world of intuitions for the real world. He simply did not give the reader the necessary tools to understand his message, yet he expects him to do so.