I wonder what BlueWing thinks the reason is for all of this. I actually, for a change, think most of what he said is right. Though it contains some of BlueWing's typical, blatant failures to properly interpret/represent (in this case, mainly just interpret).
To put a lot of this in a more compact form, I'd say that Nocapszy:
Seldom ever defines his terms.
Does not cite any authoratitive source of information or provide any evidence of his own authority.
Does not respect the propper place of the burden of proof.
Will not consistently address claims, questions, or responses.
Tends to put implicit premises in the mouth of his opponent.
And Has never in any instance I've seen, stated his purpose.
This does actually get to the core of a number of BlueWing's points. However, if BlueWing thinks this is all an accident, then I'd say he's very wrong. I don't think any of this is accidental on Nocapszy's part. It's either voluntary that he puts these holes in his arguments, or he at least makes no effort to get rid of those holes.
I think it's most likely that Nocapszy's main goal is to simply extract entertainment from people by toying with them. It is not in anyone's interest to actually seek insight from what he says, as there are far more cost-efficient ways to gain insight. If it amuse you to do so, then go ahead and float your boat.
For me, it's just amusing to see the one comment on the other in such a manner.
[As a direct response to the thread title, I will say that Nocapszy's posts are intelligible as long as they are not part of an argument.